当减少农药的目标与 "一切照旧 "相吻合时:对拉脱维亚农作物部门的可能影响

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aleksejs Nipers , Irina Pilvere , Ilze Upite , Agnese Krievina , Aija Pilvere
{"title":"当减少农药的目标与 \"一切照旧 \"相吻合时:对拉脱维亚农作物部门的可能影响","authors":"Aleksejs Nipers ,&nbsp;Irina Pilvere ,&nbsp;Ilze Upite ,&nbsp;Agnese Krievina ,&nbsp;Aija Pilvere","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The European Union (EU) has set forth ambitious political objectives aimed at mitigating the adverse impacts of agriculture on climate, environment, and human health. Among the measures which are expected to help reach the goals, an important objective is significant reduction of pesticide usage, as outlined in the EU’s ”From Farm to Fork” strategy. This study seeks to assess the potential financial implications of the reduction of pesticide use, focusing on the major crops cultivated in Latvia. Scenario simulations have been conducted to examine the consequences of pesticide usage intensity on profitability, yields, and consumption of fertilisers. The evaluation encompasses winter and spring wheat, along with winter rapeseed, which account for 80% of the total pesticide usage in Latvia. It is assumed that farmers continue to produce the same crops, using their current level of knowledge and adjusting production technology to the reduced pesticides application rates. The analysis leads to the conclusion that in order to attain a reduction in pesticide use by 61% from the 2021 level (or 53% from the 2015–2017 level), the application rate of pesticides needs to be limited to 0.78 kg ha <sup>−1</sup> of active substance for conventionally produced winter and spring wheat as well as winter rapeseed, and in addition to that the area used for these crops should be reduced by 33% (replaced with organic production). However, if the market prices of crops, the amount of public support and production costs do not change, the financial implications for the agricultural sector could be severe — yearly farm profit in the analysed sector could decrease by 41% or by EUR 130 mln.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000385/pdfft?md5=0c659bb259ed4f34b944493fd503e121&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916123000385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When pesticide reduction objectives meet business as usual: Possible impacts on the crop sector in Latvia\",\"authors\":\"Aleksejs Nipers ,&nbsp;Irina Pilvere ,&nbsp;Ilze Upite ,&nbsp;Agnese Krievina ,&nbsp;Aija Pilvere\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The European Union (EU) has set forth ambitious political objectives aimed at mitigating the adverse impacts of agriculture on climate, environment, and human health. Among the measures which are expected to help reach the goals, an important objective is significant reduction of pesticide usage, as outlined in the EU’s ”From Farm to Fork” strategy. This study seeks to assess the potential financial implications of the reduction of pesticide use, focusing on the major crops cultivated in Latvia. Scenario simulations have been conducted to examine the consequences of pesticide usage intensity on profitability, yields, and consumption of fertilisers. The evaluation encompasses winter and spring wheat, along with winter rapeseed, which account for 80% of the total pesticide usage in Latvia. It is assumed that farmers continue to produce the same crops, using their current level of knowledge and adjusting production technology to the reduced pesticides application rates. The analysis leads to the conclusion that in order to attain a reduction in pesticide use by 61% from the 2021 level (or 53% from the 2015–2017 level), the application rate of pesticides needs to be limited to 0.78 kg ha <sup>−1</sup> of active substance for conventionally produced winter and spring wheat as well as winter rapeseed, and in addition to that the area used for these crops should be reduced by 33% (replaced with organic production). However, if the market prices of crops, the amount of public support and production costs do not change, the financial implications for the agricultural sector could be severe — yearly farm profit in the analysed sector could decrease by 41% or by EUR 130 mln.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000385/pdfft?md5=0c659bb259ed4f34b944493fd503e121&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916123000385-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲联盟(欧盟)提出了雄心勃勃的政治目标,旨在减轻农业对气候、环境和人类健康的不利影响。欧盟 "从农田到餐桌 "战略中提出的一项重要目标是大幅减少杀虫剂的使用。本研究以拉脱维亚种植的主要作物为重点,旨在评估减少杀虫剂使用可能产生的财务影响。我们进行了情景模拟,以研究农药使用强度对收益率、产量和化肥消耗量的影响。评估范围包括冬小麦、春小麦和冬季油菜籽,它们占拉脱维亚农药总用量的 80%。假设农民继续生产相同的作物,利用现有的知识水平,并根据减少的农药施用量调整生产技术。分析得出的结论是,为了在 2021 年的水平上减少 61%的农药使用量(或在 2015-2017 年的水平上减少 53%),传统生产的冬小麦、春小麦和冬油菜的农药施用量需限制在 0.78 kg ha -1 有效物质,此外,这些作物的使用面积应减少 33%(用有机生产替代)。然而,如果农作物的市场价格、公共支持金额和生产成本不发生变化,对农业部门的财务影响可能会很严重--受分析部门的年农业利润可能会减少 41% 或 1.3 亿欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

When pesticide reduction objectives meet business as usual: Possible impacts on the crop sector in Latvia

When pesticide reduction objectives meet business as usual: Possible impacts on the crop sector in Latvia

The European Union (EU) has set forth ambitious political objectives aimed at mitigating the adverse impacts of agriculture on climate, environment, and human health. Among the measures which are expected to help reach the goals, an important objective is significant reduction of pesticide usage, as outlined in the EU’s ”From Farm to Fork” strategy. This study seeks to assess the potential financial implications of the reduction of pesticide use, focusing on the major crops cultivated in Latvia. Scenario simulations have been conducted to examine the consequences of pesticide usage intensity on profitability, yields, and consumption of fertilisers. The evaluation encompasses winter and spring wheat, along with winter rapeseed, which account for 80% of the total pesticide usage in Latvia. It is assumed that farmers continue to produce the same crops, using their current level of knowledge and adjusting production technology to the reduced pesticides application rates. The analysis leads to the conclusion that in order to attain a reduction in pesticide use by 61% from the 2021 level (or 53% from the 2015–2017 level), the application rate of pesticides needs to be limited to 0.78 kg ha −1 of active substance for conventionally produced winter and spring wheat as well as winter rapeseed, and in addition to that the area used for these crops should be reduced by 33% (replaced with organic production). However, if the market prices of crops, the amount of public support and production costs do not change, the financial implications for the agricultural sector could be severe — yearly farm profit in the analysed sector could decrease by 41% or by EUR 130 mln.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信