冲突与共存之间:橡胶景观中的野生动物

Franziska K. Harich-Wloka, Anna C. Treydte, Joseph O. Ogutu, Chution Savini, Kriangsak Sribuarod, Tommaso Savini
{"title":"冲突与共存之间:橡胶景观中的野生动物","authors":"Franziska K. Harich-Wloka,&nbsp;Anna C. Treydte,&nbsp;Joseph O. Ogutu,&nbsp;Chution Savini,&nbsp;Kriangsak Sribuarod,&nbsp;Tommaso Savini","doi":"10.1002/inc3.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The continuing loss and degradation of their natural habitats forces some wildlife species to increasingly extend their habitats into farmlands, thereby intensifying conflicts with people as resources diminish. Despite massive expansion in rubber (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) plantations in recent decades, little is known about the diversity and distribution of wild mammals in rubber-dominated landscapes or the associated human-wildlife conflicts. We assessed the presence and diversity of mammalian wildlife and damage occurrence in such rubber landscapes in southern Thailand, in and around Tai Rom Yen National Park. We interviewed 180 farmers about wildlife visits to their farms and the resulting damage. We conducted 50 transect walks within and adjacent to a natural forest and deployed camera traps at the boundary between the plantations and the forest, as well as deeper into the forest, to assess wildlife presence. A total of 35 mammal species were recorded inside the forest. More than 70% of these were also present at the forest boundary, but species presence and diversity were far lower in the farmland. Elephants (<i>Elephas maximus</i>) were responsible for 90% of wildlife damage incidents within the rubber plantations, with 86% of these cases affecting young plants that had not yet been tapped. Although almost half of the survey respondents reported elephants visiting their farms, less than half of them reported damage. These results suggest that rubber-dominated landscapes surrounding protected areas have the potential to facilitate coexistence between people and certain wildlife species, particularly if young plants are better protected and plantation management is made more wildlife friendly.</p>","PeriodicalId":100680,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Conservation","volume":"2 4","pages":"240-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.32","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between conflict and coexistence: Wildlife in rubber-dominated landscapes\\n 冲突与共存之间:橡胶林主导景观中的野生动物\",\"authors\":\"Franziska K. Harich-Wloka,&nbsp;Anna C. Treydte,&nbsp;Joseph O. Ogutu,&nbsp;Chution Savini,&nbsp;Kriangsak Sribuarod,&nbsp;Tommaso Savini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/inc3.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The continuing loss and degradation of their natural habitats forces some wildlife species to increasingly extend their habitats into farmlands, thereby intensifying conflicts with people as resources diminish. Despite massive expansion in rubber (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) plantations in recent decades, little is known about the diversity and distribution of wild mammals in rubber-dominated landscapes or the associated human-wildlife conflicts. We assessed the presence and diversity of mammalian wildlife and damage occurrence in such rubber landscapes in southern Thailand, in and around Tai Rom Yen National Park. We interviewed 180 farmers about wildlife visits to their farms and the resulting damage. We conducted 50 transect walks within and adjacent to a natural forest and deployed camera traps at the boundary between the plantations and the forest, as well as deeper into the forest, to assess wildlife presence. A total of 35 mammal species were recorded inside the forest. More than 70% of these were also present at the forest boundary, but species presence and diversity were far lower in the farmland. Elephants (<i>Elephas maximus</i>) were responsible for 90% of wildlife damage incidents within the rubber plantations, with 86% of these cases affecting young plants that had not yet been tapped. Although almost half of the survey respondents reported elephants visiting their farms, less than half of them reported damage. These results suggest that rubber-dominated landscapes surrounding protected areas have the potential to facilitate coexistence between people and certain wildlife species, particularly if young plants are better protected and plantation management is made more wildlife friendly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Conservation\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"240-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.32\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然栖息地的不断丧失和退化迫使一些野生动物物种越来越多地将栖息地扩展到农田,从而加剧了资源减少时与人类的冲突。尽管近几十年来橡胶(Hevea brasiliensis)种植园大规模扩张,但人们对以橡胶为主的地貌中野生哺乳动物的多样性和分布以及相关的人类与野生动物冲突知之甚少。我们评估了泰国南部大罗勉国家公园及其周边地区此类橡胶景观中哺乳类野生动物的存在和多样性以及损害发生情况。我们对 180 名农民进行了访谈,了解野生动物到访他们的农场并造成损害的情况。我们在自然森林内和附近进行了 50 次横断面行走,并在种植园和森林之间的边界以及森林深处布设了相机陷阱,以评估野生动物的存在情况。在森林内共记录到 35 种哺乳动物。其中超过 70% 的物种也出现在森林边界,但农田里的物种出现率和多样性都要低得多。在橡胶园内发生的野生动物破坏事件中,有 90% 是由大象造成的,其中 86% 影响到尚未开垦的幼苗。尽管近一半的调查对象称大象曾到访过他们的农场,但只有不到一半的调查对象报告了大象造成的损害。这些结果表明,保护区周围以橡胶为主的地貌有可能促进人类与某些野生动物物种的共存,特别是如果幼苗得到更好的保护,种植园的管理对野生动物更加友好的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Between conflict and coexistence: Wildlife in rubber-dominated landscapes
      冲突与共存之间:橡胶林主导景观中的野生动物

Between conflict and coexistence: Wildlife in rubber-dominated landscapes 冲突与共存之间:橡胶林主导景观中的野生动物

The continuing loss and degradation of their natural habitats forces some wildlife species to increasingly extend their habitats into farmlands, thereby intensifying conflicts with people as resources diminish. Despite massive expansion in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations in recent decades, little is known about the diversity and distribution of wild mammals in rubber-dominated landscapes or the associated human-wildlife conflicts. We assessed the presence and diversity of mammalian wildlife and damage occurrence in such rubber landscapes in southern Thailand, in and around Tai Rom Yen National Park. We interviewed 180 farmers about wildlife visits to their farms and the resulting damage. We conducted 50 transect walks within and adjacent to a natural forest and deployed camera traps at the boundary between the plantations and the forest, as well as deeper into the forest, to assess wildlife presence. A total of 35 mammal species were recorded inside the forest. More than 70% of these were also present at the forest boundary, but species presence and diversity were far lower in the farmland. Elephants (Elephas maximus) were responsible for 90% of wildlife damage incidents within the rubber plantations, with 86% of these cases affecting young plants that had not yet been tapped. Although almost half of the survey respondents reported elephants visiting their farms, less than half of them reported damage. These results suggest that rubber-dominated landscapes surrounding protected areas have the potential to facilitate coexistence between people and certain wildlife species, particularly if young plants are better protected and plantation management is made more wildlife friendly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信