为什么格莱斯式的反可能性虚无真理辩护行不通，而基于启发式的辩护却可能行得通？

{"title":"为什么格莱斯式的反可能性虚无真理辩护行不通，而基于启发式的辩护却可能行得通？","authors":"Tomasz Puczyłowski","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04436-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"3 4","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why a Gricean-style defense of the vacuous truth of counterpossibles won’t work, but a defense based on heuristics just might\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Puczyłowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11229-023-04436-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":49452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synthese\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synthese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04436-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synthese","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04436-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}