棕地再生的政策整合:分析工具

Armin Mehdipour , Jon Kellett , Elisa Palazzo , Martin Larbi
{"title":"棕地再生的政策整合:分析工具","authors":"Armin Mehdipour ,&nbsp;Jon Kellett ,&nbsp;Elisa Palazzo ,&nbsp;Martin Larbi","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fragmentation of policymaking within government structures and hierarchies can often impede the formulation and implementation of sustainable urban policy. This fragmentation is apparent in complex issues such as the remediation and redevelopment of brownfields. This paper addresses integration across multiple policy domains using brownfield regeneration as a vehicle. Building on the logic and principles of Environmental Policy Integration (EPI), we present a structured analytical tool (namely Policy Integration for Brownfields- PIB) to aid in a systematic analysis of brownfield policy across different regimes at different stages of policy development. We demonstrate the utility of PIB with examples from the USA, Europe, UK, Japan, and China to highlight the critical factors essential to ensure brownfield regeneration meets the overarching aim of making cities more sustainable. The findings suggest a need for balance between often conflicting environmental and non-environmental goals in multiple phases of brownfield policymaking and practice, both between levels of government (horizontally) and across sectoral interests (vertically).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000391/pdfft?md5=958f88567b6540d787a58d8cfd53aab4&pid=1-s2.0-S2772737823000391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy integration for brownfield regeneration: An analytical tool\",\"authors\":\"Armin Mehdipour ,&nbsp;Jon Kellett ,&nbsp;Elisa Palazzo ,&nbsp;Martin Larbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fragmentation of policymaking within government structures and hierarchies can often impede the formulation and implementation of sustainable urban policy. This fragmentation is apparent in complex issues such as the remediation and redevelopment of brownfields. This paper addresses integration across multiple policy domains using brownfield regeneration as a vehicle. Building on the logic and principles of Environmental Policy Integration (EPI), we present a structured analytical tool (namely Policy Integration for Brownfields- PIB) to aid in a systematic analysis of brownfield policy across different regimes at different stages of policy development. We demonstrate the utility of PIB with examples from the USA, Europe, UK, Japan, and China to highlight the critical factors essential to ensure brownfield regeneration meets the overarching aim of making cities more sustainable. The findings suggest a need for balance between often conflicting environmental and non-environmental goals in multiple phases of brownfield policymaking and practice, both between levels of government (horizontally) and across sectoral interests (vertically).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000391/pdfft?md5=958f88567b6540d787a58d8cfd53aab4&pid=1-s2.0-S2772737823000391-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府结构和层级内的决策分散往往会阻碍可持续城市政策的制定和实施。这种各自为政的现象在诸如棕地修复和再开发等复杂问题上非常明显。本文以棕地再生为载体,探讨多个政策领域的整合问题。基于环境政策整合(EPI)的逻辑和原则,我们提出了一个结构化的分析工具(即棕地政策整合-PIB),以帮助在政策制定的不同阶段对不同制度下的棕地政策进行系统分析。我们以美国、欧洲、英国、日本和中国的实例证明了 PIB 的实用性,强调了确保棕地再生达到使城市更具可持续性这一总体目标的关键因素。研究结果表明,在棕地政策制定和实践的多个阶段中,需要在往往相互冲突的环境目标和非环境目标之间取得平衡,这既包括各级政府之间(横向)的平衡,也包括各部门利益之间(纵向)的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Policy integration for brownfield regeneration: An analytical tool

Policy integration for brownfield regeneration: An analytical tool

Fragmentation of policymaking within government structures and hierarchies can often impede the formulation and implementation of sustainable urban policy. This fragmentation is apparent in complex issues such as the remediation and redevelopment of brownfields. This paper addresses integration across multiple policy domains using brownfield regeneration as a vehicle. Building on the logic and principles of Environmental Policy Integration (EPI), we present a structured analytical tool (namely Policy Integration for Brownfields- PIB) to aid in a systematic analysis of brownfield policy across different regimes at different stages of policy development. We demonstrate the utility of PIB with examples from the USA, Europe, UK, Japan, and China to highlight the critical factors essential to ensure brownfield regeneration meets the overarching aim of making cities more sustainable. The findings suggest a need for balance between often conflicting environmental and non-environmental goals in multiple phases of brownfield policymaking and practice, both between levels of government (horizontally) and across sectoral interests (vertically).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信