丹麦一所大学医院前线护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间管理访客限制的经验 - 吸取的教训。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1111/scs.13232
Anne Sophie Ågård, Gitte Susanne Rasmussen, Hanne Mainz, Merete Gregersen, Tina Wang Vedelø
{"title":"丹麦一所大学医院前线护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间管理访客限制的经验 - 吸取的教训。","authors":"Anne Sophie Ågård, Gitte Susanne Rasmussen, Hanne Mainz, Merete Gregersen, Tina Wang Vedelø","doi":"10.1111/scs.13232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide visitor restrictions forced nurses to separate patients from their relatives. However, the experience of implementing shifting restrictions from the frontline nurses' perspectives in a Danish context has yet to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore frontline nurses' experiences of managing shifting visitor restrictions in a Danish somatic university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire, including open-ended questions, was developed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>116 nurses from 29 departments participated; they were informed about restrictions primarily by their charge nurses and hospital intranet. Shifting visitor restrictions compelled the nurses to constantly adjust and negotiate their practices. When deciding to suggest deviating from the restrictions, they shared their decision-making with colleagues. Visitor restrictions left the hospital environment quieter, but they also created a lack of overview and predictability, an emotional burden, and a negative impact on the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restricting relatives' access challenged the nurses' professional values, and it seems to have affirmed their appreciation of relatives' role as important partners in contemporary hospital-based health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontline nurses' experiences of managing visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Danish university hospital - Lessons learned.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Sophie Ågård, Gitte Susanne Rasmussen, Hanne Mainz, Merete Gregersen, Tina Wang Vedelø\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scs.13232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide visitor restrictions forced nurses to separate patients from their relatives. However, the experience of implementing shifting restrictions from the frontline nurses' perspectives in a Danish context has yet to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore frontline nurses' experiences of managing shifting visitor restrictions in a Danish somatic university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire, including open-ended questions, was developed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>116 nurses from 29 departments participated; they were informed about restrictions primarily by their charge nurses and hospital intranet. Shifting visitor restrictions compelled the nurses to constantly adjust and negotiate their practices. When deciding to suggest deviating from the restrictions, they shared their decision-making with colleagues. Visitor restrictions left the hospital environment quieter, but they also created a lack of overview and predictability, an emotional burden, and a negative impact on the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restricting relatives' access challenged the nurses' professional values, and it seems to have affirmed their appreciation of relatives' role as important partners in contemporary hospital-based health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍世界范围内的探视限制迫使护士将病人与亲属分开。目的:本描述性定性研究旨在探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,丹麦一所大学附属医院的一线护士在管理访客转移限制方面的经验:方法:我们编制了一份在线问卷,其中包括开放式问题。结果:来自 29 个科室的 116 名护士参与了问卷调查:来自 29 个科室的 116 名护士参与了问卷调查;他们主要通过主管护士和医院内部网了解到有关限制的信息。访客限制的变化迫使护士们不断调整和协商自己的做法。在决定建议偏离限制时,她们会与同事分享自己的决定。访客限制使医院环境更加安静,但也造成了缺乏概览和可预见性、情感负担以及对护理质量的负面影响:限制亲属探视对护士的职业价值观提出了挑战,但似乎也肯定了她们对亲属在当代医院医疗保健中作为重要合作伙伴的角色的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontline nurses' experiences of managing visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Danish university hospital - Lessons learned.

Background: Worldwide visitor restrictions forced nurses to separate patients from their relatives. However, the experience of implementing shifting restrictions from the frontline nurses' perspectives in a Danish context has yet to be assessed.

Aim: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore frontline nurses' experiences of managing shifting visitor restrictions in a Danish somatic university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: An online questionnaire, including open-ended questions, was developed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Findings: 116 nurses from 29 departments participated; they were informed about restrictions primarily by their charge nurses and hospital intranet. Shifting visitor restrictions compelled the nurses to constantly adjust and negotiate their practices. When deciding to suggest deviating from the restrictions, they shared their decision-making with colleagues. Visitor restrictions left the hospital environment quieter, but they also created a lack of overview and predictability, an emotional burden, and a negative impact on the quality of care.

Conclusion: Restricting relatives' access challenged the nurses' professional values, and it seems to have affirmed their appreciation of relatives' role as important partners in contemporary hospital-based health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信