探索呼吸疗法的知识差距和研究需求:定性描述研究。

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.29390/001c.91184
Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew West, Esther Khor, Shirley Quach, Mika L Nonoyama
{"title":"探索呼吸疗法的知识差距和研究需求:定性描述研究。","authors":"Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew West, Esther Khor, Shirley Quach, Mika L Nonoyama","doi":"10.29390/001c.91184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory therapists (RTs) are expected to stay updated on technology, treatments, research, and best practices to provide high-quality patient care. They must possess the skills to interpret, evaluate, and contribute to evidence-based practices. However, RTs often rely on research from other professions that may not fully address their specific needs, leading to insufficient guidance for their practice. Additionally, there has been no exploration of knowledge gaps and research needs from RTs' perspectives to enhance their practice and patient outcomes. The research questions guiding this study were: (<i>i</i>) what are the perceived practice-oriented knowledge gaps? and (<i>ii</i>) what are the necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession according to experts in respiratory therapy?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative description study was conducted using semi-structured focus groups with 40 expert RTs from seven areas of practice across Canada. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four major themes relating to what these experts perceive as the practice-oriented gaps and necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession: 1) system-level impact of RTs, 2) optimizing respiratory therapy practices, 3) scholarship on the respiratory therapy profession and 4) respiratory therapy education.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings establish a fundamental understanding of the current gaps and the specific needs of RTs that require further investigation. Participants strongly emphasized the significance of research priorities that consider the breadth and depth of the respiratory therapy profession, which underscores the complex nature of respiratory therapy and its application in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unique insights garnered from this study highlight the knowledge gaps and research needs specific to RTs. These findings pave the way for further exploration, discourse, and research aimed at understanding the specific contributions and requirements of RTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"60 ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10769513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy: a qualitative description study.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Zaccagnini, Andrew West, Esther Khor, Shirley Quach, Mika L Nonoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.29390/001c.91184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory therapists (RTs) are expected to stay updated on technology, treatments, research, and best practices to provide high-quality patient care. They must possess the skills to interpret, evaluate, and contribute to evidence-based practices. However, RTs often rely on research from other professions that may not fully address their specific needs, leading to insufficient guidance for their practice. Additionally, there has been no exploration of knowledge gaps and research needs from RTs' perspectives to enhance their practice and patient outcomes. The research questions guiding this study were: (<i>i</i>) what are the perceived practice-oriented knowledge gaps? and (<i>ii</i>) what are the necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession according to experts in respiratory therapy?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative description study was conducted using semi-structured focus groups with 40 expert RTs from seven areas of practice across Canada. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four major themes relating to what these experts perceive as the practice-oriented gaps and necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession: 1) system-level impact of RTs, 2) optimizing respiratory therapy practices, 3) scholarship on the respiratory therapy profession and 4) respiratory therapy education.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings establish a fundamental understanding of the current gaps and the specific needs of RTs that require further investigation. Participants strongly emphasized the significance of research priorities that consider the breadth and depth of the respiratory therapy profession, which underscores the complex nature of respiratory therapy and its application in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unique insights garnered from this study highlight the knowledge gaps and research needs specific to RTs. These findings pave the way for further exploration, discourse, and research aimed at understanding the specific contributions and requirements of RTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10769513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.91184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.91184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们期望呼吸治疗师(RTs)不断更新技术、治疗、研究和最佳实践,以提供高质量的患者护理。他们必须具备解释、评估和促进循证实践的技能。然而,康复治疗师往往依赖于其他专业的研究,而这些研究可能无法完全满足他们的特定需求,从而导致对他们的实践指导不足。此外,还没有从 RTs 的角度探讨知识差距和研究需求,以提高他们的实践水平和患者的治疗效果。指导本研究的研究问题是(i) 以实践为导向的知识差距是什么? (ii) 根据呼吸治疗专家的观点,整个呼吸治疗专业的必要研究重点是什么?采用半结构化焦点小组的形式,对来自加拿大七个实践领域的 40 位 RT 专家进行了定性描述研究。采用定性内容分析法对数据进行分析:结果:我们确定了与这些专家所认为的整个呼吸治疗专业以实践为导向的差距和必要的研究重点相关的四大主题:1)呼吸治疗师的系统级影响;2)优化呼吸治疗实践;3)呼吸治疗专业的学术研究;4)呼吸治疗教育:讨论:研究结果使人们从根本上了解了目前存在的差距以及需要进一步调查的呼吸治疗师的具体需求。与会者大力强调了考虑呼吸治疗专业广度和深度的研究重点的重要性,这突出了呼吸治疗的复杂性及其在实践中的应用:本研究获得的独特见解凸显了呼吸治疗师特有的知识差距和研究需求。这些发现为进一步探索、讨论和研究了解呼吸治疗师的特殊贡献和要求铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring knowledge gaps and research needs in respiratory therapy: a qualitative description study.

Background: Respiratory therapists (RTs) are expected to stay updated on technology, treatments, research, and best practices to provide high-quality patient care. They must possess the skills to interpret, evaluate, and contribute to evidence-based practices. However, RTs often rely on research from other professions that may not fully address their specific needs, leading to insufficient guidance for their practice. Additionally, there has been no exploration of knowledge gaps and research needs from RTs' perspectives to enhance their practice and patient outcomes. The research questions guiding this study were: (i) what are the perceived practice-oriented knowledge gaps? and (ii) what are the necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession according to experts in respiratory therapy?

Methods: A qualitative description study was conducted using semi-structured focus groups with 40 expert RTs from seven areas of practice across Canada. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: We identified four major themes relating to what these experts perceive as the practice-oriented gaps and necessary research priorities across the respiratory therapy profession: 1) system-level impact of RTs, 2) optimizing respiratory therapy practices, 3) scholarship on the respiratory therapy profession and 4) respiratory therapy education.

Discussion: The findings establish a fundamental understanding of the current gaps and the specific needs of RTs that require further investigation. Participants strongly emphasized the significance of research priorities that consider the breadth and depth of the respiratory therapy profession, which underscores the complex nature of respiratory therapy and its application in practice.

Conclusion: The unique insights garnered from this study highlight the knowledge gaps and research needs specific to RTs. These findings pave the way for further exploration, discourse, and research aimed at understanding the specific contributions and requirements of RTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信