在每次献血都要接受检测的献血人群中,亚临床感染病原体的流行率。

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
B. Correia, A. Magalhães, L. Rocha, I. Cardoso, R. R. F. Ferreira, I. Mesa-Sanchez
{"title":"在每次献血都要接受检测的献血人群中,亚临床感染病原体的流行率。","authors":"B. Correia,&nbsp;A. Magalhães,&nbsp;L. Rocha,&nbsp;I. Cardoso,&nbsp;R. R. F. Ferreira,&nbsp;I. Mesa-Sanchez","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of blood-borne infectious agents in healthy, client-owned dogs from a blood donor population in Portugal and Spain, and to address the importance of a screening protocol on every donation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Client-owned healthy dogs were tested before each donation on a veterinary blood bank. Blood samples from new potential donors, and from regular donors, were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction for <i>Leishmania</i> species, <i>Ehrlichia</i> species, <i>Brucella</i> species, <i>Babesia</i> species and <i>Anaplasma</i> species Serological tests were also performed for <i>Leishmania</i> species, <i>Ehrlichia</i> species and <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i>. All donors were tested for every infectious agent in each donation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that out of a total of 8036 donors and 35,120 samples tested, 3.9% of blood donors tested positive for at least one of the agents, with the most prevalent being <i>Anaplasma</i> species (2.1%). Serological tests also revealed positive results in 14.0% of donors, with the highest percentage for <i>Leishmania</i> species (7.7%). Moreover, the study found that 28.2% of positive results were from dogs with negative results in donations performed 3 to 12 months before, and 18.0% of positive results were recent infections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>These findings indicate a high prevalence of infectious agents in seemingly healthy, selected dogs eligible to become blood donors in the Iberian Peninsula, highlighting the importance of regular testing on every donation. This study emphasises the importance of a regular screening protocol for every donation instead of annual testing, as is commonly performed in veterinary medicine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":"65 3","pages":"176-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of subclinical infectious agents in a blood donor population tested on every donation\",\"authors\":\"B. Correia,&nbsp;A. Magalhães,&nbsp;L. Rocha,&nbsp;I. Cardoso,&nbsp;R. R. F. Ferreira,&nbsp;I. Mesa-Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsap.13698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of blood-borne infectious agents in healthy, client-owned dogs from a blood donor population in Portugal and Spain, and to address the importance of a screening protocol on every donation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Client-owned healthy dogs were tested before each donation on a veterinary blood bank. Blood samples from new potential donors, and from regular donors, were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction for <i>Leishmania</i> species, <i>Ehrlichia</i> species, <i>Brucella</i> species, <i>Babesia</i> species and <i>Anaplasma</i> species Serological tests were also performed for <i>Leishmania</i> species, <i>Ehrlichia</i> species and <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i>. All donors were tested for every infectious agent in each donation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study found that out of a total of 8036 donors and 35,120 samples tested, 3.9% of blood donors tested positive for at least one of the agents, with the most prevalent being <i>Anaplasma</i> species (2.1%). Serological tests also revealed positive results in 14.0% of donors, with the highest percentage for <i>Leishmania</i> species (7.7%). Moreover, the study found that 28.2% of positive results were from dogs with negative results in donations performed 3 to 12 months before, and 18.0% of positive results were recent infections.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings indicate a high prevalence of infectious agents in seemingly healthy, selected dogs eligible to become blood donors in the Iberian Peninsula, highlighting the importance of regular testing on every donation. This study emphasises the importance of a regular screening protocol for every donation instead of annual testing, as is commonly performed in veterinary medicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"176-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13698\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估葡萄牙和西班牙献血者群体中健康的客户饲养犬只血液传播传染病病原体的流行情况,并探讨每次献血筛查方案的重要性:本研究旨在评估葡萄牙和西班牙献血者群体中客户饲养的健康犬只血液传播传染病病原体的流行情况,并探讨每次献血前进行筛查的重要性:在兽医血库中,客户饲养的健康犬每次献血前都要接受检测。通过实时聚合酶链式反应对新的潜在献血者和定期献血者的血样进行利什曼病、埃立克病、布鲁氏菌、巴贝斯虫和阿纳普拉丝玛病的检测,同时还对利什曼病、埃立克病和米氏双鞭毛虫进行血清学检测。对所有捐献者的每次捐献都进行了每种传染病病原体的检测:研究发现,在总共 8036 名献血者和 35 120 份检测样本中,3.9% 的献血者至少有一种病原体检测呈阳性,其中最常见的是阿纳普拉菌(2.1%)。血清学检测也显示 14.0% 的献血者检测结果呈阳性,其中利什曼原虫的比例最高(7.7%)。此外,研究还发现,28.2%的阳性结果来自于 3 至 12 个月前捐献结果为阴性的犬只,18.0%的阳性结果为近期感染:这些研究结果表明,在伊比利亚半岛,经过挑选的符合献血条件的看似健康的犬只中,传染性病原体的流行率很高,这凸显了对每次献血进行定期检测的重要性。这项研究强调了对每次献血进行定期筛查的重要性,而不是像兽医学中通常进行的那样每年检测一次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of subclinical infectious agents in a blood donor population tested on every donation

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of blood-borne infectious agents in healthy, client-owned dogs from a blood donor population in Portugal and Spain, and to address the importance of a screening protocol on every donation.

Materials and Methods

Client-owned healthy dogs were tested before each donation on a veterinary blood bank. Blood samples from new potential donors, and from regular donors, were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction for Leishmania species, Ehrlichia species, Brucella species, Babesia species and Anaplasma species Serological tests were also performed for Leishmania species, Ehrlichia species and Dirofilaria immitis. All donors were tested for every infectious agent in each donation.

Results

The study found that out of a total of 8036 donors and 35,120 samples tested, 3.9% of blood donors tested positive for at least one of the agents, with the most prevalent being Anaplasma species (2.1%). Serological tests also revealed positive results in 14.0% of donors, with the highest percentage for Leishmania species (7.7%). Moreover, the study found that 28.2% of positive results were from dogs with negative results in donations performed 3 to 12 months before, and 18.0% of positive results were recent infections.

Clinical Significance

These findings indicate a high prevalence of infectious agents in seemingly healthy, selected dogs eligible to become blood donors in the Iberian Peninsula, highlighting the importance of regular testing on every donation. This study emphasises the importance of a regular screening protocol for every donation instead of annual testing, as is commonly performed in veterinary medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信