结节性红斑的非典型和典型表现:治疗和结果的临床差异。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1159/000535617
Nina Meienberger, Julia-Tatjana Maul, Fabienne Fröhlich, Lara Valeska Maul, Thomas Kündig, Thierry Nordmann, Florian Anzengruber
{"title":"结节性红斑的非典型和典型表现:治疗和结果的临床差异。","authors":"Nina Meienberger, Julia-Tatjana Maul, Fabienne Fröhlich, Lara Valeska Maul, Thomas Kündig, Thierry Nordmann, Florian Anzengruber","doi":"10.1159/000535617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erythema nodosum (EN) is the most common form of panniculitis that predominantly affects the shins. While EN in atypical sites has been described by many authors, there are currently only case studies published on this topic. This study aimed to evaluate clinical differences between patients suffering from EN on the shins, compared to patients with EN in atypical locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 105 patients in a retrospective, single-center study at a university hospital in Switzerland. Typical EN was defined as lesions, found only on the lower legs, while atypical EN as lesions on the upper legs, trunk, arms, or face, only or in addition to lesions on the lower legs. The patients were assessed for age, gender, dermatologic history, time until first medical consultation, time to diagnosis, and time until remission. Further, etiology, symptoms, and applied therapies were investigated. Findings were then compared between the typical and atypical EN cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we included 70 patients (37.99 ± 15.67 [3-81] years) with EN solely on the shins and 35 patients (41.27 ± 16.85 [9-76] years) with EN on other locations. Interestingly, time until diagnosis was significantly shorter in atypical EN (p = 0.034, 1.14 ± 4.68 vs. 0.46 ± 1.14 months). Time to remission was similar in both groups (3.61 ± 2.73 vs. 3.05 ± 2.86 months, respectively). Sarcoidosis was the only etiologic factor significantly more frequent in atypical EN compared to typical EN (23% vs. 9%, p = 0.042). Besides that, solely subtle differences were seen regarding etiology, gender, age at onset, course of the disease, and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that only minor alterations between both study populations exist. Significant differences were found in time to diagnosis (shorter for atypical EN), as well as in sarcoidosis as an etiologic factor (more frequent in atypical EN). While adalimumab was only prescribed in atypical EN cases, prognosis seems to be similar for typical and atypical EN (similar time to remission, similar amount of reoccurring cases). Due to the limited sample size, however, our study population may have been too small to detect the relevant differences, and bigger studies may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical and Typical Presentation of Erythema Nodosum: Clinical Differences in Treatment and Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Meienberger, Julia-Tatjana Maul, Fabienne Fröhlich, Lara Valeska Maul, Thomas Kündig, Thierry Nordmann, Florian Anzengruber\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erythema nodosum (EN) is the most common form of panniculitis that predominantly affects the shins. While EN in atypical sites has been described by many authors, there are currently only case studies published on this topic. This study aimed to evaluate clinical differences between patients suffering from EN on the shins, compared to patients with EN in atypical locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 105 patients in a retrospective, single-center study at a university hospital in Switzerland. Typical EN was defined as lesions, found only on the lower legs, while atypical EN as lesions on the upper legs, trunk, arms, or face, only or in addition to lesions on the lower legs. The patients were assessed for age, gender, dermatologic history, time until first medical consultation, time to diagnosis, and time until remission. Further, etiology, symptoms, and applied therapies were investigated. Findings were then compared between the typical and atypical EN cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we included 70 patients (37.99 ± 15.67 [3-81] years) with EN solely on the shins and 35 patients (41.27 ± 16.85 [9-76] years) with EN on other locations. Interestingly, time until diagnosis was significantly shorter in atypical EN (p = 0.034, 1.14 ± 4.68 vs. 0.46 ± 1.14 months). Time to remission was similar in both groups (3.61 ± 2.73 vs. 3.05 ± 2.86 months, respectively). Sarcoidosis was the only etiologic factor significantly more frequent in atypical EN compared to typical EN (23% vs. 9%, p = 0.042). Besides that, solely subtle differences were seen regarding etiology, gender, age at onset, course of the disease, and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that only minor alterations between both study populations exist. Significant differences were found in time to diagnosis (shorter for atypical EN), as well as in sarcoidosis as an etiologic factor (more frequent in atypical EN). While adalimumab was only prescribed in atypical EN cases, prognosis seems to be similar for typical and atypical EN (similar time to remission, similar amount of reoccurring cases). Due to the limited sample size, however, our study population may have been too small to detect the relevant differences, and bigger studies may be needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"226-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:结节性红斑(EN)是最常见的泛发性皮肤炎,主要影响胫骨。虽然许多作者都描述过非典型部位的结节性红斑,但目前仅有相关的病例研究。本研究旨在评估胫部EN患者与非典型部位EN患者的临床差异。方法 我们对瑞士一家大学医院的 105 名患者进行了回顾性单中心研究分析。典型EN的定义是仅在小腿上发现的病变,而非典型EN的定义是仅在小腿上发现或除了小腿上的病变外,还在上肢、躯干、手臂或面部发现的病变。对患者的年龄、性别、皮肤病史、首次就诊时间、确诊时间和缓解时间进行了评估。此外,还对病因、症状和应用疗法进行了调查。然后对典型和非典型 EN 患者的调查结果进行比较。结果 我们共收治了 70 例(37.99 ± 15.67 [3-81]岁)仅在胫骨部位出现 EN 的患者,以及 35 例(41.27 ± 16.85 [9-76]岁)在其他部位出现 EN 的患者。有趣的是,非典型EN的诊断时间明显较短(P=0.034,1.14 ± 4.68 vs. 0.46 ± 1.14个月)。两组患者的缓解时间相似(分别为 3.61 ± 2.73 对 3.05 ± 2.86 个月)。与典型EN相比,肉样瘤病是非典型EN中唯一明显更常见的病因(23% vs. 9%,P=0.042)。除此以外,病因、性别、发病年龄、病程和症状等方面均存在细微差别。结论 我们的研究表明,两个研究人群之间仅存在微小的差异。在诊断时间(非典型耳鼻咽喉炎的诊断时间较短)和作为病因的肉样瘤病(非典型耳鼻咽喉炎的发病率较高)方面存在显著差异。虽然阿达木单抗仅用于非典型EN病例,但典型EN和非典型EN的预后似乎相似(缓解时间相似,复发病例数量相似)。然而,由于样本量有限,我们的研究人群可能太小,无法检测到相关差异,因此可能需要更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atypical and Typical Presentation of Erythema Nodosum: Clinical Differences in Treatment and Outcome.

Introduction: Erythema nodosum (EN) is the most common form of panniculitis that predominantly affects the shins. While EN in atypical sites has been described by many authors, there are currently only case studies published on this topic. This study aimed to evaluate clinical differences between patients suffering from EN on the shins, compared to patients with EN in atypical locations.

Methods: We analyzed 105 patients in a retrospective, single-center study at a university hospital in Switzerland. Typical EN was defined as lesions, found only on the lower legs, while atypical EN as lesions on the upper legs, trunk, arms, or face, only or in addition to lesions on the lower legs. The patients were assessed for age, gender, dermatologic history, time until first medical consultation, time to diagnosis, and time until remission. Further, etiology, symptoms, and applied therapies were investigated. Findings were then compared between the typical and atypical EN cohorts.

Results: Overall, we included 70 patients (37.99 ± 15.67 [3-81] years) with EN solely on the shins and 35 patients (41.27 ± 16.85 [9-76] years) with EN on other locations. Interestingly, time until diagnosis was significantly shorter in atypical EN (p = 0.034, 1.14 ± 4.68 vs. 0.46 ± 1.14 months). Time to remission was similar in both groups (3.61 ± 2.73 vs. 3.05 ± 2.86 months, respectively). Sarcoidosis was the only etiologic factor significantly more frequent in atypical EN compared to typical EN (23% vs. 9%, p = 0.042). Besides that, solely subtle differences were seen regarding etiology, gender, age at onset, course of the disease, and symptoms.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that only minor alterations between both study populations exist. Significant differences were found in time to diagnosis (shorter for atypical EN), as well as in sarcoidosis as an etiologic factor (more frequent in atypical EN). While adalimumab was only prescribed in atypical EN cases, prognosis seems to be similar for typical and atypical EN (similar time to remission, similar amount of reoccurring cases). Due to the limited sample size, however, our study population may have been too small to detect the relevant differences, and bigger studies may be needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信