{"title":"用天真的贝叶斯模型平均法预测核质量","authors":"X.Y. Zhang (张晓燕) , W.F. Li (李伟峰) , J.Y. Fang (方基宇) , Z.M. Niu (牛中明)","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A naive Bayesian model averaging (NBMA) method is developed to predict nuclear masses. In the NBMA method, the weights of different models may be different for each nucleus, which are sensitive to the model accuracies to describe the nuclear masses of the isotopes and isotones with the same proton and neutron numbers of that nucleus. Therefore, there are remarkable local structures for the weights of different models on the nuclear chart, which well eliminates the local deviations between the model predictions and the experimental masses and thus achieves better accuracy of mass predictions than the traditional arithmetic mean method (AMM) and weighted average method (WAM). Based on the latest atomic mass evaluation of AME2020, the root-mean-square (rms) mass deviation of the NBMA method is 0.293 MeV, while the rms deviations of AMM and WAM are 0.634 and 0.361 MeV, respectively. This accuracy of the NBMA method is even 28% better than the best accuracy of the mass models used in the NBMA method. The extrapolation ability of the NBMA method is also verified with the experimental nuclear masses which are not used in the training of the NBMA method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19246,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Physics A","volume":"1043 ","pages":"Article 122820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nuclear mass predictions with the naive Bayesian model averaging method\",\"authors\":\"X.Y. Zhang (张晓燕) , W.F. Li (李伟峰) , J.Y. Fang (方基宇) , Z.M. Niu (牛中明)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A naive Bayesian model averaging (NBMA) method is developed to predict nuclear masses. In the NBMA method, the weights of different models may be different for each nucleus, which are sensitive to the model accuracies to describe the nuclear masses of the isotopes and isotones with the same proton and neutron numbers of that nucleus. Therefore, there are remarkable local structures for the weights of different models on the nuclear chart, which well eliminates the local deviations between the model predictions and the experimental masses and thus achieves better accuracy of mass predictions than the traditional arithmetic mean method (AMM) and weighted average method (WAM). Based on the latest atomic mass evaluation of AME2020, the root-mean-square (rms) mass deviation of the NBMA method is 0.293 MeV, while the rms deviations of AMM and WAM are 0.634 and 0.361 MeV, respectively. This accuracy of the NBMA method is even 28% better than the best accuracy of the mass models used in the NBMA method. The extrapolation ability of the NBMA method is also verified with the experimental nuclear masses which are not used in the training of the NBMA method.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Physics A\",\"volume\":\"1043 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Physics A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947424000022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Physics A","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947424000022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nuclear mass predictions with the naive Bayesian model averaging method
A naive Bayesian model averaging (NBMA) method is developed to predict nuclear masses. In the NBMA method, the weights of different models may be different for each nucleus, which are sensitive to the model accuracies to describe the nuclear masses of the isotopes and isotones with the same proton and neutron numbers of that nucleus. Therefore, there are remarkable local structures for the weights of different models on the nuclear chart, which well eliminates the local deviations between the model predictions and the experimental masses and thus achieves better accuracy of mass predictions than the traditional arithmetic mean method (AMM) and weighted average method (WAM). Based on the latest atomic mass evaluation of AME2020, the root-mean-square (rms) mass deviation of the NBMA method is 0.293 MeV, while the rms deviations of AMM and WAM are 0.634 and 0.361 MeV, respectively. This accuracy of the NBMA method is even 28% better than the best accuracy of the mass models used in the NBMA method. The extrapolation ability of the NBMA method is also verified with the experimental nuclear masses which are not used in the training of the NBMA method.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Physics A focuses on the domain of nuclear and hadronic physics and includes the following subsections: Nuclear Structure and Dynamics; Intermediate and High Energy Heavy Ion Physics; Hadronic Physics; Electromagnetic and Weak Interactions; Nuclear Astrophysics. The emphasis is on original research papers. A number of carefully selected and reviewed conference proceedings are published as an integral part of the journal.