网格大小和统计不确定性对基于头颈部癌症剂量参数的 VMAT 计划准确性的影响

Asma Javid, J. Nagesh, Rajpal Singh, Senni Andavar S, Shambhavi C, Krishna Sharan, Preeti Kour
{"title":"网格大小和统计不确定性对基于头颈部癌症剂量参数的 VMAT 计划准确性的影响","authors":"Asma Javid, J. Nagesh, Rajpal Singh, Senni Andavar S, Shambhavi C, Krishna Sharan, Preeti Kour","doi":"10.1177/25898892231196723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Grid size and Statistical Uncertainty (SU) settings have an impact on the efficiency and accuracy of the treatment plans. Hence, it is very important, to find an optimum combination of the two-dose calculation parameters for efficient treatment planning. This study aims to study the impact of Grid Size and SU on Head and Neck cancer plans which were planned using the Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. Materials and Methods 15 patients were selected for this retrospective study who had undergone radiation therapy at KMC, Manipal for various Head and Neck cancers. VMAT plans were generated for each case in Monaco 5.11 Treatment Planning System (TPS) using the Monte Carlo algorithm. For each patient, nine plans were generated in which the Grid size values were taken as 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm and for each Grid size, SU settings were varied as 1%, 2%, and 5%. The plans were analysed and evaluated using outcome measures such as the Homogeneity Index (HI) and the Conformity Index (CI). Results The plans were evaluated as per the ICRU guidelines. In all the plans, PTV coverage achieved was above 95% with the maximum coverage (97.009) achieved with the 3 mm/1% combination. Overall, the effect of varying Grid Size and SU was insignificant in the plans generated, but there were few variations in the dose calculation parameters. For 2 mm/1%, 2 mm/2%, 2 mm/5%, 3 mm/1%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/5%, 5 mm/1%, 5 mm/2%, 5 mm/5%, the mean values of HI were 1.073, 1.078,1.078, 1.075, 1.0805, 1.0805, 1.068, 1.079, 1.089, and the mean values of CI were 0.968, 0.967, 0.967, 0.968, 0.958, 0.96, 0.954, 0.946, 0.948, respectively. Among all the combinations, the results for 5 mm/1% yielded more homogeneity, whereas 2 mm/1% and 3 mm/1% combinations resulted in better conformity. The 3 mm/1% combination gave maximum target coverage and quite fewer Monitor Units (MU) as well. Conclusion 3 mm Grid Size and 1% SU is suggested for the Head and Neck carcinomas planned using the VMAT technique.","PeriodicalId":315168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Oncology","volume":"77 1","pages":"15 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Grid Size and Statistical Uncertainty on the Accuracy of VMAT Plans Based on Dosimetric Parameters for Head and Neck Cancers\",\"authors\":\"Asma Javid, J. Nagesh, Rajpal Singh, Senni Andavar S, Shambhavi C, Krishna Sharan, Preeti Kour\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25898892231196723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim Grid size and Statistical Uncertainty (SU) settings have an impact on the efficiency and accuracy of the treatment plans. Hence, it is very important, to find an optimum combination of the two-dose calculation parameters for efficient treatment planning. This study aims to study the impact of Grid Size and SU on Head and Neck cancer plans which were planned using the Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. Materials and Methods 15 patients were selected for this retrospective study who had undergone radiation therapy at KMC, Manipal for various Head and Neck cancers. VMAT plans were generated for each case in Monaco 5.11 Treatment Planning System (TPS) using the Monte Carlo algorithm. For each patient, nine plans were generated in which the Grid size values were taken as 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm and for each Grid size, SU settings were varied as 1%, 2%, and 5%. The plans were analysed and evaluated using outcome measures such as the Homogeneity Index (HI) and the Conformity Index (CI). Results The plans were evaluated as per the ICRU guidelines. In all the plans, PTV coverage achieved was above 95% with the maximum coverage (97.009) achieved with the 3 mm/1% combination. Overall, the effect of varying Grid Size and SU was insignificant in the plans generated, but there were few variations in the dose calculation parameters. For 2 mm/1%, 2 mm/2%, 2 mm/5%, 3 mm/1%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/5%, 5 mm/1%, 5 mm/2%, 5 mm/5%, the mean values of HI were 1.073, 1.078,1.078, 1.075, 1.0805, 1.0805, 1.068, 1.079, 1.089, and the mean values of CI were 0.968, 0.967, 0.967, 0.968, 0.958, 0.96, 0.954, 0.946, 0.948, respectively. Among all the combinations, the results for 5 mm/1% yielded more homogeneity, whereas 2 mm/1% and 3 mm/1% combinations resulted in better conformity. The 3 mm/1% combination gave maximum target coverage and quite fewer Monitor Units (MU) as well. Conclusion 3 mm Grid Size and 1% SU is suggested for the Head and Neck carcinomas planned using the VMAT technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Oncology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25898892231196723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25898892231196723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 网格大小和统计不确定性(SU)设置会影响治疗计划的效率和准确性。因此,找到双剂量计算参数的最佳组合对于高效的治疗计划非常重要。本研究旨在研究网格大小和 SU 对使用体积调制弧线疗法(VMAT)技术规划的头颈部癌症计划的影响。材料和方法 本次回顾性研究选取了 15 名在马尼帕尔 KMC 接受放射治疗的头颈部癌症患者。采用蒙特卡罗算法在摩纳哥 5.11 治疗计划系统 (TPS) 中为每个病例生成 VMAT 计划。为每位患者生成了九个计划,其中网格大小值分别为 2 毫米、3 毫米和 5 毫米,每个网格大小的 SU 设置分别为 1%、2% 和 5%。使用同质性指数(HI)和一致性指数(CI)等结果指标对这些计划进行分析和评估。结果 根据 ICRU 指南对计划进行了评估。在所有计划中,PTV 覆盖率均超过 95%,其中 3 毫米/1% 组合的覆盖率最高(97.009)。总体而言,在生成的计划中,改变栅格大小和 SU 的影响不大,但剂量计算参数有一些变化。CI的平均值分别为 0.968、0.967、0.967、0.968、0.958、0.96、0.954、0.946、0.948。在所有组合中,5 毫米/1% 的组合产生的均匀度更高,而 2 毫米/1% 和 3 毫米/1% 的组合产生的一致性更好。3 毫米/1%组合的目标覆盖范围最大,监测单位(MU)也相当少。结论 建议使用 VMAT 技术对头颈部癌进行规划,网格尺寸为 3 毫米,SU 为 1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Grid Size and Statistical Uncertainty on the Accuracy of VMAT Plans Based on Dosimetric Parameters for Head and Neck Cancers
Aim Grid size and Statistical Uncertainty (SU) settings have an impact on the efficiency and accuracy of the treatment plans. Hence, it is very important, to find an optimum combination of the two-dose calculation parameters for efficient treatment planning. This study aims to study the impact of Grid Size and SU on Head and Neck cancer plans which were planned using the Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. Materials and Methods 15 patients were selected for this retrospective study who had undergone radiation therapy at KMC, Manipal for various Head and Neck cancers. VMAT plans were generated for each case in Monaco 5.11 Treatment Planning System (TPS) using the Monte Carlo algorithm. For each patient, nine plans were generated in which the Grid size values were taken as 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm and for each Grid size, SU settings were varied as 1%, 2%, and 5%. The plans were analysed and evaluated using outcome measures such as the Homogeneity Index (HI) and the Conformity Index (CI). Results The plans were evaluated as per the ICRU guidelines. In all the plans, PTV coverage achieved was above 95% with the maximum coverage (97.009) achieved with the 3 mm/1% combination. Overall, the effect of varying Grid Size and SU was insignificant in the plans generated, but there were few variations in the dose calculation parameters. For 2 mm/1%, 2 mm/2%, 2 mm/5%, 3 mm/1%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/5%, 5 mm/1%, 5 mm/2%, 5 mm/5%, the mean values of HI were 1.073, 1.078,1.078, 1.075, 1.0805, 1.0805, 1.068, 1.079, 1.089, and the mean values of CI were 0.968, 0.967, 0.967, 0.968, 0.958, 0.96, 0.954, 0.946, 0.948, respectively. Among all the combinations, the results for 5 mm/1% yielded more homogeneity, whereas 2 mm/1% and 3 mm/1% combinations resulted in better conformity. The 3 mm/1% combination gave maximum target coverage and quite fewer Monitor Units (MU) as well. Conclusion 3 mm Grid Size and 1% SU is suggested for the Head and Neck carcinomas planned using the VMAT technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信