Er、Cr:YSGG和飞秒激光对生物活性和树脂改性玻璃离子水泥牙本质粘附性的影响

IF 0.1 4区 医学
Fahad H. Alkhudhairy, Y. AlFawaz
{"title":"Er、Cr:YSGG和飞秒激光对生物活性和树脂改性玻璃离子水泥牙本质粘附性的影响","authors":"Fahad H. Alkhudhairy, Y. AlFawaz","doi":"10.1166/jbt.2023.3313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study examined the shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure of bioactive resin cement (BARC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin treated with Er, Cr: YSGG (ECrL) and femtosecond laser (FSL). Methods: 120 non-carious, non-fractured human molars without prior restorations were selected and processed. The teeth were grouped by surface conditioning. Groups 1 and 5 were untreated controls. Groups 2 and 6 had ECrL surface treatment, while Groups 3 and 7 had FSL. EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal conditioned Groups 4 and 8. Groups 1–4 (n = 15) employed BARC for bonding, while Groups 5–8 used RMGIC. A universal testing machine (UTM) tested shear bond strength, and a stereomicroscope studied the failure mode. Comparing findings required means, SDs, ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: Group 1, without conditioning, has the lowest BARC-bonded SBS. In Group 4, EDTA+ Tetric N-Bond Universal-conditioned dentin bonded to BARC had the greatest SBS values. In the RMGIC-bonded groups, Group 5 without dentin conditioning had the lowest bond values, while EDTA+ Tetric NBond Universal-conditioned dentin had the greatest. Conclusion: EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal dentin conditioning improves RMGIC and BARC bond strength. This study’s conditioning methods boosted bond strength.","PeriodicalId":15300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Level Laser Therapy of Er, Cr: YSGG and Femtosecond on Dentin Adhesion with Bioactive and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement\",\"authors\":\"Fahad H. Alkhudhairy, Y. AlFawaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1166/jbt.2023.3313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study examined the shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure of bioactive resin cement (BARC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin treated with Er, Cr: YSGG (ECrL) and femtosecond laser (FSL). Methods: 120 non-carious, non-fractured human molars without prior restorations were selected and processed. The teeth were grouped by surface conditioning. Groups 1 and 5 were untreated controls. Groups 2 and 6 had ECrL surface treatment, while Groups 3 and 7 had FSL. EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal conditioned Groups 4 and 8. Groups 1–4 (n = 15) employed BARC for bonding, while Groups 5–8 used RMGIC. A universal testing machine (UTM) tested shear bond strength, and a stereomicroscope studied the failure mode. Comparing findings required means, SDs, ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: Group 1, without conditioning, has the lowest BARC-bonded SBS. In Group 4, EDTA+ Tetric N-Bond Universal-conditioned dentin bonded to BARC had the greatest SBS values. In the RMGIC-bonded groups, Group 5 without dentin conditioning had the lowest bond values, while EDTA+ Tetric NBond Universal-conditioned dentin had the greatest. Conclusion: EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal dentin conditioning improves RMGIC and BARC bond strength. This study’s conditioning methods boosted bond strength.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了生物活性树脂水泥(BARC)和树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)与牙本质的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和破坏模式:YSGG(ECrL)和飞秒激光(FSL)处理的牙本质的粘结强度(SBS)和失效模式。方法:选择并处理 120 颗未龋坏、未折断且未进行过修复的人类臼齿。牙齿按表面条件分组。第 1 组和第 5 组为未经处理的对照组。第 2 组和第 6 组进行了 ECrL 表面处理,第 3 组和第 7 组进行了 FSL 表面处理。第 4 组和第 8 组进行了 EDTA 和 Tetric N-Bond Universal 表面处理。第 1-4 组(n = 15)使用 BARC 进行粘接,而第 5-8 组则使用 RMGIC。万能试验机(UTM)测试剪切粘接强度,立体显微镜研究失效模式。比较结果需要采用均值、标度、方差分析和 Tukey 后检验。结果 未进行调节的第 1 组的 BARC 粘合 SBS 最低。在第 4 组中,与 BARC 粘合的 EDTA+ Tetric N-Bond Universal 条件牙本质的 SBS 值最大。在 RMGIC 粘合组中,未进行牙本质调理的第 5 组的粘接值最低,而 EDTA+ Tetric NBond Universal 调理牙本质的粘接值最高。结论:EDTA和Tetric N-Bond Universal调理牙本质可提高RMGIC和BARC粘接强度。本研究的调节方法提高了粘接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-Level Laser Therapy of Er, Cr: YSGG and Femtosecond on Dentin Adhesion with Bioactive and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement
Aim: This study examined the shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure of bioactive resin cement (BARC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to dentin treated with Er, Cr: YSGG (ECrL) and femtosecond laser (FSL). Methods: 120 non-carious, non-fractured human molars without prior restorations were selected and processed. The teeth were grouped by surface conditioning. Groups 1 and 5 were untreated controls. Groups 2 and 6 had ECrL surface treatment, while Groups 3 and 7 had FSL. EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal conditioned Groups 4 and 8. Groups 1–4 (n = 15) employed BARC for bonding, while Groups 5–8 used RMGIC. A universal testing machine (UTM) tested shear bond strength, and a stereomicroscope studied the failure mode. Comparing findings required means, SDs, ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: Group 1, without conditioning, has the lowest BARC-bonded SBS. In Group 4, EDTA+ Tetric N-Bond Universal-conditioned dentin bonded to BARC had the greatest SBS values. In the RMGIC-bonded groups, Group 5 without dentin conditioning had the lowest bond values, while EDTA+ Tetric NBond Universal-conditioned dentin had the greatest. Conclusion: EDTA and Tetric N-Bond Universal dentin conditioning improves RMGIC and BARC bond strength. This study’s conditioning methods boosted bond strength.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信