学生的措辞:医学本科课程教学、学习和评估方法的优点、缺陷和改进建议

Iram Imran, Sadia Sharif
{"title":"学生的措辞:医学本科课程教学、学习和评估方法的优点、缺陷和改进建议","authors":"Iram Imran, Sadia Sharif","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v6i1.1774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Curriculum design, delivery and implementation is an essential part of formal medical education. Seeing the vital role which curriculum plays in medical education, regular evaluation and feedback have to be the norm. Objective: The objective of study was to gauge the perceptions of undergraduate students regarding teaching, learning and assessment methodologies alongside the strengths, weaknesses in curriculum implementation. Methods: This mixed-method study was conducted at Amna Inayat Medical College, Sheikhupura, from February 2022 until May 2022.The quantitative data from 4th year MBBS students was analysed through the filling of a pre-validated questionnaire through a Qualtrix-generated link by students. For the qualitative part, seven students were invited to participate in the FGD. Transcripts of the focus group discussion were transcribed by Atlast Ti and analysed for themes, subthemes, and quotes. Results: Fourth year students (n = 96) participated in the study. The percentage of positive feedback regarding content coherence, class participation, and teaching methodologies was 59%, 76%, and 57%, respectively. 58% of students rated small group discussions (SGD) as the best teaching strategy; however, 61% of them acknowledged multiple choice questions (MCQs) as the best assessment method. Negative perception (28%) was recorded with respect to the learning environment. Conclusion: Students were positive overall as far as their learning experiences are concerned, yet they identified numerous problematic areas. Keywords: Feedback, Perception, Medical students, Curriculum.","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The student’s wordings: Merits, flaws and recommendations for improvement of teaching, learning and assessment methodologies of an undergraduate medical curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Iram Imran, Sadia Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.53708/hpej.v6i1.1774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Curriculum design, delivery and implementation is an essential part of formal medical education. Seeing the vital role which curriculum plays in medical education, regular evaluation and feedback have to be the norm. Objective: The objective of study was to gauge the perceptions of undergraduate students regarding teaching, learning and assessment methodologies alongside the strengths, weaknesses in curriculum implementation. Methods: This mixed-method study was conducted at Amna Inayat Medical College, Sheikhupura, from February 2022 until May 2022.The quantitative data from 4th year MBBS students was analysed through the filling of a pre-validated questionnaire through a Qualtrix-generated link by students. For the qualitative part, seven students were invited to participate in the FGD. Transcripts of the focus group discussion were transcribed by Atlast Ti and analysed for themes, subthemes, and quotes. Results: Fourth year students (n = 96) participated in the study. The percentage of positive feedback regarding content coherence, class participation, and teaching methodologies was 59%, 76%, and 57%, respectively. 58% of students rated small group discussions (SGD) as the best teaching strategy; however, 61% of them acknowledged multiple choice questions (MCQs) as the best assessment method. Negative perception (28%) was recorded with respect to the learning environment. Conclusion: Students were positive overall as far as their learning experiences are concerned, yet they identified numerous problematic areas. Keywords: Feedback, Perception, Medical students, Curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Professions Educator Journal\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Professions Educator Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v6i1.1774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v6i1.1774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:课程设计、交付和实施是正规医学教育的重要组成部分。鉴于课程在医学教育中的重要作用,定期评估和反馈必须成为常态。 研究目的本研究旨在了解本科生对教学、学习和评估方法的看法,以及课程实施中的优势和不足。 研究方法这项混合方法研究于 2022 年 2 月至 2022 年 5 月在 Sheikhupura 的 Amna Inayat 医学院进行。学生们通过 Qualtrix 生成的链接填写了一份经过预先验证的调查问卷,对来自医学学士学位四年级学生的定量数据进行了分析。定性部分则邀请了七名学生参与焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论的记录由 Atlast Ti 转录,并对主题、次主题和引文进行分析。 结果四年级学生(n = 96)参与了研究。对教学内容连贯性、课堂参与度和教学方法的积极反馈比例分别为 59%、76% 和 57%。58%的学生认为小组讨论(SGD)是最好的教学策略;但61%的学生认为选择题(MCQ)是最好的评估方法。对于学习环境,有 28% 的学生持负面看法。 结论就学习经历而言,学生的总体评价是积极的,但他们也指出了许多存在问题的地方。 关键词反馈、感知、医学生、课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The student’s wordings: Merits, flaws and recommendations for improvement of teaching, learning and assessment methodologies of an undergraduate medical curriculum
Introduction: Curriculum design, delivery and implementation is an essential part of formal medical education. Seeing the vital role which curriculum plays in medical education, regular evaluation and feedback have to be the norm. Objective: The objective of study was to gauge the perceptions of undergraduate students regarding teaching, learning and assessment methodologies alongside the strengths, weaknesses in curriculum implementation. Methods: This mixed-method study was conducted at Amna Inayat Medical College, Sheikhupura, from February 2022 until May 2022.The quantitative data from 4th year MBBS students was analysed through the filling of a pre-validated questionnaire through a Qualtrix-generated link by students. For the qualitative part, seven students were invited to participate in the FGD. Transcripts of the focus group discussion were transcribed by Atlast Ti and analysed for themes, subthemes, and quotes. Results: Fourth year students (n = 96) participated in the study. The percentage of positive feedback regarding content coherence, class participation, and teaching methodologies was 59%, 76%, and 57%, respectively. 58% of students rated small group discussions (SGD) as the best teaching strategy; however, 61% of them acknowledged multiple choice questions (MCQs) as the best assessment method. Negative perception (28%) was recorded with respect to the learning environment. Conclusion: Students were positive overall as far as their learning experiences are concerned, yet they identified numerous problematic areas. Keywords: Feedback, Perception, Medical students, Curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信