高年级学生的学业自我效能感:辅导的影响

Muhammad Nufal Alifiandi, E. H. Ansyah
{"title":"高年级学生的学业自我效能感:辅导的影响","authors":"Muhammad Nufal Alifiandi, E. H. Ansyah","doi":"10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quantitative comparative study aims to examine the differences in academic self-efficacy among upper grade students in elementary schools in Sidoarjo, specifically in relation to tutoring. The research population consisted of fourth and fifth-grade students from Larangan State Elementary School and Muhammadiyah 2 Kedungbanteng Elementary School, with a total of 185 subjects. The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, comprising 27 items, was used to measure self-perceived abilities. Data analysis involved the two independent sample t-test technique. The results indicated no significant difference (p > 0.5) in academic self-efficacy between students who received tutoring and those who did not. The Cronbach's Alpha test demonstrated high reliability (0.890) for the academic self-efficacy scale. This study highlights that tutoring did not have a significant impact on the academic self-efficacy of upper grade students. These findings provide implications for educators and parents in considering alternative strategies to enhance students' academic self-efficacy beyond traditional tutoring approaches. Highlight: No significant difference: The study reveals that there is no significant difference in academic self-efficacy between students who receive tutoring and those who do not. Reliable scale: The academic self-efficacy scale used in the study demonstrates high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.890. Implications for practice: The findings suggest that tutoring may not be the sole determinant of academic self-efficacy in upper grade students, prompting educators and parents to consider alternative strategies to enhance students' belief in their abilities. Keyword: Academic Self-Efficacy, Tutoring, Upper Grade Students, Quantitative Comparison, Elementary School","PeriodicalId":131820,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Self-Efficacy of Upper Grade Students: The Impact of Tutoring\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Nufal Alifiandi, E. H. Ansyah\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This quantitative comparative study aims to examine the differences in academic self-efficacy among upper grade students in elementary schools in Sidoarjo, specifically in relation to tutoring. The research population consisted of fourth and fifth-grade students from Larangan State Elementary School and Muhammadiyah 2 Kedungbanteng Elementary School, with a total of 185 subjects. The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, comprising 27 items, was used to measure self-perceived abilities. Data analysis involved the two independent sample t-test technique. The results indicated no significant difference (p > 0.5) in academic self-efficacy between students who received tutoring and those who did not. The Cronbach's Alpha test demonstrated high reliability (0.890) for the academic self-efficacy scale. This study highlights that tutoring did not have a significant impact on the academic self-efficacy of upper grade students. These findings provide implications for educators and parents in considering alternative strategies to enhance students' academic self-efficacy beyond traditional tutoring approaches. Highlight: No significant difference: The study reveals that there is no significant difference in academic self-efficacy between students who receive tutoring and those who do not. Reliable scale: The academic self-efficacy scale used in the study demonstrates high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.890. Implications for practice: The findings suggest that tutoring may not be the sole determinant of academic self-efficacy in upper grade students, prompting educators and parents to consider alternative strategies to enhance students' belief in their abilities. Keyword: Academic Self-Efficacy, Tutoring, Upper Grade Students, Quantitative Comparison, Elementary School\",\"PeriodicalId\":131820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定量比较研究旨在探讨锡都阿州小学高年级学生在学业自我效能感方面的差异,特别是与辅导相关的差异。研究对象包括 Larangan 州立小学和 Muhammadiyah 2 Kedungbanteng 小学的四年级和五年级学生,共计 185 人。学业自我效能感量表由 27 个项目组成,用于测量自我认知能力。数据分析采用了两个独立样本 t 检验技术。结果显示,接受辅导的学生与未接受辅导的学生在学业自我效能感方面没有明显差异(P>0.5)。Cronbach's Alpha 检验表明,学业自我效能感量表的信度很高(0.890)。本研究强调,辅导对高年级学生的学业自我效能感没有显著影响。这些发现为教育工作者和家长提供了启示,他们可以考虑在传统的辅导方法之外,采用其他策略来提高学生的学业自我效能感。 亮点: 无明显差异:研究显示,接受辅导和不接受辅导的学生在学业自我效能感方面没有显著差异。 量表可靠:研究中使用的学业自我效能感量表具有很高的可靠性,其 Cronbach's Alpha 系数为 0.890。 对实践的启示:研究结果表明,辅导可能不是高年级学生学业自我效能感的唯一决定因素,这促使教育工作者和家长考虑采取其他策略来增强学生对自身能力的信心。 关键词:学业自我效能感 辅导 高年级学生 定量比较 小学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic Self-Efficacy of Upper Grade Students: The Impact of Tutoring
This quantitative comparative study aims to examine the differences in academic self-efficacy among upper grade students in elementary schools in Sidoarjo, specifically in relation to tutoring. The research population consisted of fourth and fifth-grade students from Larangan State Elementary School and Muhammadiyah 2 Kedungbanteng Elementary School, with a total of 185 subjects. The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, comprising 27 items, was used to measure self-perceived abilities. Data analysis involved the two independent sample t-test technique. The results indicated no significant difference (p > 0.5) in academic self-efficacy between students who received tutoring and those who did not. The Cronbach's Alpha test demonstrated high reliability (0.890) for the academic self-efficacy scale. This study highlights that tutoring did not have a significant impact on the academic self-efficacy of upper grade students. These findings provide implications for educators and parents in considering alternative strategies to enhance students' academic self-efficacy beyond traditional tutoring approaches. Highlight: No significant difference: The study reveals that there is no significant difference in academic self-efficacy between students who receive tutoring and those who do not. Reliable scale: The academic self-efficacy scale used in the study demonstrates high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.890. Implications for practice: The findings suggest that tutoring may not be the sole determinant of academic self-efficacy in upper grade students, prompting educators and parents to consider alternative strategies to enhance students' belief in their abilities. Keyword: Academic Self-Efficacy, Tutoring, Upper Grade Students, Quantitative Comparison, Elementary School
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信