{"title":"私有化的学术写作：关于获取、知识和政策的思考","authors":"Bruce Horner","doi":"10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dialogue responds to Neculai (2018) and argues for the need to recognise the character of academic literacies development and the policies governing that development as always emergent. It also reflects on the contributions that all, including students, make toward that development through their written work, as opposed to accepting the treatment of academic literacies development as a commodity to which access is given.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privatised Academic Writing: Reflections on Access, Knowledge, and Policy\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Horner\",\"doi\":\"10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This dialogue responds to Neculai (2018) and argues for the need to recognise the character of academic literacies development and the policies governing that development as always emergent. It also reflects on the contributions that all, including students, make toward that development through their written work, as opposed to accepting the treatment of academic literacies development as a commodity to which access is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Writing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Privatised Academic Writing: Reflections on Access, Knowledge, and Policy
This dialogue responds to Neculai (2018) and argues for the need to recognise the character of academic literacies development and the policies governing that development as always emergent. It also reflects on the contributions that all, including students, make toward that development through their written work, as opposed to accepting the treatment of academic literacies development as a commodity to which access is given.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
