经皮螺钉固定术与开放复位内固定术治疗微移位踝内侧骨折的比较研究

Emad El-Deen Esmat, Mohamed Ebrahim Al-Ashhab, Michael Maher Younan
{"title":"经皮螺钉固定术与开放复位内固定术治疗微移位踝内侧骨折的比较研究","authors":"Emad El-Deen Esmat, Mohamed Ebrahim Al-Ashhab, Michael Maher Younan","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.216978.1191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medial malleolar fractures are common ankle injuries that can be managed using different surgical techniques. This research purposed to evaluate the short-term effects of percutaneous cancellous screw fixation against open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of minimally displaced medial malleolar fractures. Methods: This study included a random sample of 20 patients who have minimally displaced medial malleolar fracture, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed 6 months follow up period at the Orthopedic Department of Benha University Hospitals and Mahalla General Hospital. Patients were split into 2 equal groups: Group I (Percutaneous group): included 10 patients who were treated with Closed Percutaneous cancellous screw Fixation. Group II (open group): comprised of 10 patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Results: A substantially critical change was present between both groups according to Operative Time which was 36.33 ± 5.16 min. in Percutaneous group and 54.00 ± 12.28 min. According to Operative outcomes in both groups, Follow-up time was about 6 months in both groups with no critical change between both groups. Union time was 9.7 ± 1.54 week in Percutaneous group and 9.1 ± 3.83 in Open group with no substantial change between both groups. Complete union was happened in 7 (70%) patients in Percutaneous group and 8 (80%) patients in Open group while delayed union has happened in 3 patients from percutaneous group and 2 patients from open group with no substantial change between both groups. Conclusions: The percutaneous technique for fixation of closed fractures of the medial malleolus is adequate and provided satisfactory final outcome but the open reduction and internal fixation allows removal of the trapped periosteal flap, direct inspection of the joint and the fracture so, it is better to use open reduction technique in all cases but in cases with bad soft tissue condition percutaneous technique could be used with acceptable results.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between Percutaneous screw Fixation and Open reduction and internal fixation in minimally displaced Medial Malleolar Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Emad El-Deen Esmat, Mohamed Ebrahim Al-Ashhab, Michael Maher Younan\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bjas.2023.216978.1191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Medial malleolar fractures are common ankle injuries that can be managed using different surgical techniques. This research purposed to evaluate the short-term effects of percutaneous cancellous screw fixation against open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of minimally displaced medial malleolar fractures. Methods: This study included a random sample of 20 patients who have minimally displaced medial malleolar fracture, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed 6 months follow up period at the Orthopedic Department of Benha University Hospitals and Mahalla General Hospital. Patients were split into 2 equal groups: Group I (Percutaneous group): included 10 patients who were treated with Closed Percutaneous cancellous screw Fixation. Group II (open group): comprised of 10 patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Results: A substantially critical change was present between both groups according to Operative Time which was 36.33 ± 5.16 min. in Percutaneous group and 54.00 ± 12.28 min. According to Operative outcomes in both groups, Follow-up time was about 6 months in both groups with no critical change between both groups. Union time was 9.7 ± 1.54 week in Percutaneous group and 9.1 ± 3.83 in Open group with no substantial change between both groups. Complete union was happened in 7 (70%) patients in Percutaneous group and 8 (80%) patients in Open group while delayed union has happened in 3 patients from percutaneous group and 2 patients from open group with no substantial change between both groups. Conclusions: The percutaneous technique for fixation of closed fractures of the medial malleolus is adequate and provided satisfactory final outcome but the open reduction and internal fixation allows removal of the trapped periosteal flap, direct inspection of the joint and the fracture so, it is better to use open reduction technique in all cases but in cases with bad soft tissue condition percutaneous technique could be used with acceptable results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.216978.1191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.216978.1191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内侧踝骨骨折是一种常见的踝关节损伤,可采用不同的手术方法进行治疗。本研究旨在评估经皮松质骨螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗微移位内侧踝骨骨折的短期效果。研究方法本研究随机抽取了20名内侧踝骨骨折微移位患者,这些患者均符合纳入标准,并在本哈大学医院和马哈拉综合医院骨科完成了6个月的随访。患者被平均分为两组:I组(经皮组):包括10名接受闭合经皮松质骨螺钉固定治疗的患者。第二组(开放组):10 名患者接受开放复位和内固定治疗。结果经皮组的手术时间为(36.33 ± 5.16)分钟,开放组为(54.00 ± 12.28)分钟。根据两组的手术结果,两组的随访时间均为 6 个月左右,两组之间无明显变化。经皮组的骨结合时间为(9.7 ± 1.54)周,开放组为(9.1 ± 3.83)周,两组间无明显变化。经皮组 7 例(70%)患者完全吻合,开放组 8 例(80%)患者完全吻合,经皮组 3 例患者延迟吻合,开放组 2 例患者延迟吻合,两组之间无明显变化。结论:经皮技术用于内侧踝骨闭合性骨折的固定是适当的,并能提供令人满意的最终结果,但切开复位和内固定术可以移除受困的骨膜瓣,直接检查关节和骨折,因此,最好在所有病例中使用切开复位技术,但在软组织状况不佳的病例中,经皮技术也可使用,并能获得可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study between Percutaneous screw Fixation and Open reduction and internal fixation in minimally displaced Medial Malleolar Fractures
Background: Medial malleolar fractures are common ankle injuries that can be managed using different surgical techniques. This research purposed to evaluate the short-term effects of percutaneous cancellous screw fixation against open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of minimally displaced medial malleolar fractures. Methods: This study included a random sample of 20 patients who have minimally displaced medial malleolar fracture, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed 6 months follow up period at the Orthopedic Department of Benha University Hospitals and Mahalla General Hospital. Patients were split into 2 equal groups: Group I (Percutaneous group): included 10 patients who were treated with Closed Percutaneous cancellous screw Fixation. Group II (open group): comprised of 10 patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Results: A substantially critical change was present between both groups according to Operative Time which was 36.33 ± 5.16 min. in Percutaneous group and 54.00 ± 12.28 min. According to Operative outcomes in both groups, Follow-up time was about 6 months in both groups with no critical change between both groups. Union time was 9.7 ± 1.54 week in Percutaneous group and 9.1 ± 3.83 in Open group with no substantial change between both groups. Complete union was happened in 7 (70%) patients in Percutaneous group and 8 (80%) patients in Open group while delayed union has happened in 3 patients from percutaneous group and 2 patients from open group with no substantial change between both groups. Conclusions: The percutaneous technique for fixation of closed fractures of the medial malleolus is adequate and provided satisfactory final outcome but the open reduction and internal fixation allows removal of the trapped periosteal flap, direct inspection of the joint and the fracture so, it is better to use open reduction technique in all cases but in cases with bad soft tissue condition percutaneous technique could be used with acceptable results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信