倒骑驴礼

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Kubilay Aktulum
{"title":"倒骑驴礼","authors":"Kubilay Aktulum","doi":"10.58242/millifolklor.1245970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stith Thompson's Motif Index of Folk literature includes the motif of making one mounting a donkey backwards as a form of punishment. Emine Çakır, in an unpublished essay titled, “Why did Nasreddin Hodja mount the donkey backwards? Who knows…”, gives some definitions of the equivalent of this motif in Turkey. The motif in question, which is frequently encountered in Western and Eastern cultures and used in different fields such as literature, history, law, art, apart from folklore (especially in the carnival tradition), varies according to the context in different countries. Hence, while working on the perception of the motif in question, it is necessary to consider the following distinction: \"Mounting a donkey backwards\" and \"being forced to mount a donkey backwards\" are two different acts. The former is related to an idea of \"will\", while the latter is related to an idea of “involuntary”. One is active while the other is passive, respectively. In the active, the subject is the real subject of the action; in the passive, the real subject is someone else (the people); the apparent subject is the one which is exposed to the action. The active one should be evaluated from the perspective of ethics, morality, tolerance, belief (religion); the passive one is suitable to be evaluated from the perspective of morality, belief (religion) as well as violence (humiliation, ridicule, punishment), and therefore justice. The motif of mounting a donkey backwards in Nasreddin Hodja is suitable for the first definition. In Western cultures, the recurring similar motif (mainly action) fits the second definition. Different subjects and different actions naturally open the door for the differentiation of motivations. For example, while the motif comes to the fore in Nasreddin Hodja more of a respect/disrespect dilemma, in Western cultures (especially in France) it appears as an image/act (and ritual) of \"punishment\" from the Middle Ages until the end of the nineteenth century. In this article, it will be focused not on the question of why Nasreddin Hodja mounts the donkey backwards (a lot has been said about it), but rather on the applications and meanings of the motif of mounting the donkey backwards in France as well as in some other countries and works.","PeriodicalId":44416,"journal":{"name":"Milli Folklor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BİR ŞAMATA BİÇİMİ OLARAK EŞEĞE TERSİNE BİNDİRİLME RİTÜELİ\",\"authors\":\"Kubilay Aktulum\",\"doi\":\"10.58242/millifolklor.1245970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stith Thompson's Motif Index of Folk literature includes the motif of making one mounting a donkey backwards as a form of punishment. Emine Çakır, in an unpublished essay titled, “Why did Nasreddin Hodja mount the donkey backwards? Who knows…”, gives some definitions of the equivalent of this motif in Turkey. The motif in question, which is frequently encountered in Western and Eastern cultures and used in different fields such as literature, history, law, art, apart from folklore (especially in the carnival tradition), varies according to the context in different countries. Hence, while working on the perception of the motif in question, it is necessary to consider the following distinction: \\\"Mounting a donkey backwards\\\" and \\\"being forced to mount a donkey backwards\\\" are two different acts. The former is related to an idea of \\\"will\\\", while the latter is related to an idea of “involuntary”. One is active while the other is passive, respectively. In the active, the subject is the real subject of the action; in the passive, the real subject is someone else (the people); the apparent subject is the one which is exposed to the action. The active one should be evaluated from the perspective of ethics, morality, tolerance, belief (religion); the passive one is suitable to be evaluated from the perspective of morality, belief (religion) as well as violence (humiliation, ridicule, punishment), and therefore justice. The motif of mounting a donkey backwards in Nasreddin Hodja is suitable for the first definition. In Western cultures, the recurring similar motif (mainly action) fits the second definition. Different subjects and different actions naturally open the door for the differentiation of motivations. For example, while the motif comes to the fore in Nasreddin Hodja more of a respect/disrespect dilemma, in Western cultures (especially in France) it appears as an image/act (and ritual) of \\\"punishment\\\" from the Middle Ages until the end of the nineteenth century. In this article, it will be focused not on the question of why Nasreddin Hodja mounts the donkey backwards (a lot has been said about it), but rather on the applications and meanings of the motif of mounting the donkey backwards in France as well as in some other countries and works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milli Folklor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milli Folklor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58242/millifolklor.1245970\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milli Folklor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58242/millifolklor.1245970","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Stith Thompson 的《民间文学主题索引》收录了让人倒骑驴作为惩罚形式的主题。Emine Çakır 在一篇题为 "Nasreddin Hodja 为什么倒骑驴?谁知道呢...... "一文中,对土耳其的这一主题给出了一些相应的定义。除了民间传说(尤其是狂欢节传统)之外,该图案在西方和东方文化中经常出现,并被用于文学、历史、法律、艺术等不同领域。因此,在研究有关图案的概念时,有必要考虑以下区别:"倒骑驴 "和 "被迫倒骑驴 "是两种不同的行为。前者与 "意愿 "的概念有关,而后者与 "非自愿 "的概念有关。一个是主动行为,一个是被动行为。在主动行为中,主体是行为的真正主体;在被动行为中,真正的主体是其他人(人们);表面的主体是行为的暴露者。主动行为应从伦理、道德、宽容、信仰(宗教)的角度来评价;被动行为则适合从道德、信仰(宗教)以及暴力(羞辱、嘲笑、惩罚)的角度来评价,因此也适合从正义的角度来评价。Nasreddin Hodja》中 "倒骑毛驴 "的主题适合第一种定义。在西方文化中,反复出现的类似主题(主要是动作)符合第二个定义。不同的主题和不同的行动自然为区分动机打开了大门。例如,在《纳斯雷丁-霍贾》中,这一主题的出现更多是出于尊重与不尊重的两难境地,而在西方文化中(尤其是在法国),从中世纪到 19 世纪末,它一直是作为 "惩罚 "的形象/行为(和仪式)出现的。本文的重点不是纳斯雷丁-霍贾为何倒骑驴的问题(对此已有很多论述),而是倒骑驴这一主题在法国以及其他一些国家和作品中的应用和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BİR ŞAMATA BİÇİMİ OLARAK EŞEĞE TERSİNE BİNDİRİLME RİTÜELİ
Stith Thompson's Motif Index of Folk literature includes the motif of making one mounting a donkey backwards as a form of punishment. Emine Çakır, in an unpublished essay titled, “Why did Nasreddin Hodja mount the donkey backwards? Who knows…”, gives some definitions of the equivalent of this motif in Turkey. The motif in question, which is frequently encountered in Western and Eastern cultures and used in different fields such as literature, history, law, art, apart from folklore (especially in the carnival tradition), varies according to the context in different countries. Hence, while working on the perception of the motif in question, it is necessary to consider the following distinction: "Mounting a donkey backwards" and "being forced to mount a donkey backwards" are two different acts. The former is related to an idea of "will", while the latter is related to an idea of “involuntary”. One is active while the other is passive, respectively. In the active, the subject is the real subject of the action; in the passive, the real subject is someone else (the people); the apparent subject is the one which is exposed to the action. The active one should be evaluated from the perspective of ethics, morality, tolerance, belief (religion); the passive one is suitable to be evaluated from the perspective of morality, belief (religion) as well as violence (humiliation, ridicule, punishment), and therefore justice. The motif of mounting a donkey backwards in Nasreddin Hodja is suitable for the first definition. In Western cultures, the recurring similar motif (mainly action) fits the second definition. Different subjects and different actions naturally open the door for the differentiation of motivations. For example, while the motif comes to the fore in Nasreddin Hodja more of a respect/disrespect dilemma, in Western cultures (especially in France) it appears as an image/act (and ritual) of "punishment" from the Middle Ages until the end of the nineteenth century. In this article, it will be focused not on the question of why Nasreddin Hodja mounts the donkey backwards (a lot has been said about it), but rather on the applications and meanings of the motif of mounting the donkey backwards in France as well as in some other countries and works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milli Folklor
Milli Folklor FOLKLORE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Millî Folklor Uluslararası Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 1989 yılında yayın hayatına başlamıştır. Halk Bilimi, Etnoloji, Antropoloji, Edebiyat ve kültür araştırmaları alanındaki çalışmalara yer veren Millî Folklor Dergisi 1998 yılından itibaren kimi ulusal/uluslararası indeksler ve veritabanları tarafından taranmaktadır. A&HCI, CSA, EBSCO, GJS, IBSS, MLA, SCOPUS, SJR, TA, UPD ve TÜBİTAK/ULABİM tarafından kaydedilen Millî Folklor Dergisi, araştırma, derleme, inceleme, çeviri ve tanıtma içerikli bilimsel metni hem basılı hem de elektronik ortamda okuru ile paylaşmaktadır.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信