{"title":"了解拉姆齐-德菲内蒂概率和圣彼得堡悖论","authors":"Somdeb Lahiri","doi":"10.58195/emi.v2i2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide simple interpretations of probability with a view towards its potential for real world (i.e., practical) applications. Our discussion is along the lines initiated by David Ramsey and Bruno de Finetti, though we do not provide a theory of probability but merely use their axioms and results to interpret mathematical probability. Subsequently, we provide a critique as well as a resolution of the well-known St. Petersburg paradox that is consistent with expected utility theory.","PeriodicalId":294362,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Management Information","volume":"291 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Ramsey-de Finetti Probabilities and the St. Petersburg Paradox\",\"authors\":\"Somdeb Lahiri\",\"doi\":\"10.58195/emi.v2i2.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide simple interpretations of probability with a view towards its potential for real world (i.e., practical) applications. Our discussion is along the lines initiated by David Ramsey and Bruno de Finetti, though we do not provide a theory of probability but merely use their axioms and results to interpret mathematical probability. Subsequently, we provide a critique as well as a resolution of the well-known St. Petersburg paradox that is consistent with expected utility theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Management Information\",\"volume\":\"291 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Management Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Management Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v2i2.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Ramsey-de Finetti Probabilities and the St. Petersburg Paradox
We provide simple interpretations of probability with a view towards its potential for real world (i.e., practical) applications. Our discussion is along the lines initiated by David Ramsey and Bruno de Finetti, though we do not provide a theory of probability but merely use their axioms and results to interpret mathematical probability. Subsequently, we provide a critique as well as a resolution of the well-known St. Petersburg paradox that is consistent with expected utility theory.