抗狂犬病抗体效价测定。关于合作研究的报告

Jørn Lyng , M.Weis Bentzon , E.A. Fitzgerald
{"title":"抗狂犬病抗体效价测定。关于合作研究的报告","authors":"Jørn Lyng ,&nbsp;M.Weis Bentzon ,&nbsp;E.A. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1016/0092-1157(89)90019-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relative potencies of a number of rabies immunoglobulin preparations were estimated in an international collaborative study comprising eight laboratories in five countries. Two assay methods were used: a virus neutralization test in mice (MNT) and a virus neutralization test in cell culture (RFFIT). Differences between the results obtained by the two methods, which have been reported, could <em>not</em> be generally corroborated. The results indicate that in some laboratories the MNT cause difficulties and give results different from those obtained by RFFIT. In other laboratories such difficulties are not encountered. The results seem to indicate that the RFFIT is a more reliable method than the MNT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 267-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(89)90019-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potency assay of antibodies against rabies. A report on a collaborative study\",\"authors\":\"Jørn Lyng ,&nbsp;M.Weis Bentzon ,&nbsp;E.A. Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0092-1157(89)90019-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The relative potencies of a number of rabies immunoglobulin preparations were estimated in an international collaborative study comprising eight laboratories in five countries. Two assay methods were used: a virus neutralization test in mice (MNT) and a virus neutralization test in cell culture (RFFIT). Differences between the results obtained by the two methods, which have been reported, could <em>not</em> be generally corroborated. The results indicate that in some laboratories the MNT cause difficulties and give results different from those obtained by RFFIT. In other laboratories such difficulties are not encountered. The results seem to indicate that the RFFIT is a more reliable method than the MNT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 267-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(89)90019-X\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009211578990019X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009211578990019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由五个国家的八个实验室组成的一项国际合作研究估计了一些狂犬病免疫球蛋白制剂的相对效力。采用两种检测方法:小鼠病毒中和试验(MNT)和细胞培养病毒中和试验(RFFIT)。这两种方法所得到的结果之间的差异已被报道过,但无法得到普遍证实。结果表明,在一些实验室中,MNT引起了困难,并给出了与RFFIT不同的结果。在其他实验室没有遇到这样的困难。结果似乎表明RFFIT是一种比MNT更可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potency assay of antibodies against rabies. A report on a collaborative study

The relative potencies of a number of rabies immunoglobulin preparations were estimated in an international collaborative study comprising eight laboratories in five countries. Two assay methods were used: a virus neutralization test in mice (MNT) and a virus neutralization test in cell culture (RFFIT). Differences between the results obtained by the two methods, which have been reported, could not be generally corroborated. The results indicate that in some laboratories the MNT cause difficulties and give results different from those obtained by RFFIT. In other laboratories such difficulties are not encountered. The results seem to indicate that the RFFIT is a more reliable method than the MNT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信