一项公开、随机临床对比研究,以确定伊曲康唑与特比萘芬治疗甲癣的疗效和安全性。

Priya Singh, Parul Kamal
{"title":"一项公开、随机临床对比研究,以确定伊曲康唑与特比萘芬治疗甲癣的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Priya Singh, Parul Kamal","doi":"10.36106/paripex/4500669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Onychomycosis,also known as tinea unguium,is a fungal infection of nail unit. Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole versus terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis. Study Design: An open, randomized,prospective clinical comparative study was done on 70 patients of onychomycosis attending skin OPD of SNMC Agra UP during the period from august 2019 to march 2021. 35 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral itraconazole 200mg once a day for 12weeks in group A and other 35 patients received oral terbinafine 250mg once a day for 12weeks in group B.The patients were evaluated at the start of the therapy and thereafter at 4,8,12,24 weeks. Results: In group A (Itraconazole), 62.85% of patients showed mycological cure and 51.43% of patients showed clinical cure.In group B (Terbinafine), 74.28% of patients showed mycological cure and 62.86% of patients showed clinical cure. The difference in cure rates between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Adverse effects were seen in 17.14% of patients in group A and 20% of patients in group B.None of these effects was significant enough to discontinue therapy. The difference in adverse effects between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both itraconazole and terbinafine were equally effective and safe in the treatment of onychomycosis. Both drugs were well tolerated and were relatively free of major adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":19910,"journal":{"name":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN OPEN, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY DETERMINING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ITRACONAZOLE VERSUS TERBINAFINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSIS.\",\"authors\":\"Priya Singh, Parul Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/paripex/4500669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Onychomycosis,also known as tinea unguium,is a fungal infection of nail unit. Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole versus terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis. Study Design: An open, randomized,prospective clinical comparative study was done on 70 patients of onychomycosis attending skin OPD of SNMC Agra UP during the period from august 2019 to march 2021. 35 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral itraconazole 200mg once a day for 12weeks in group A and other 35 patients received oral terbinafine 250mg once a day for 12weeks in group B.The patients were evaluated at the start of the therapy and thereafter at 4,8,12,24 weeks. Results: In group A (Itraconazole), 62.85% of patients showed mycological cure and 51.43% of patients showed clinical cure.In group B (Terbinafine), 74.28% of patients showed mycological cure and 62.86% of patients showed clinical cure. The difference in cure rates between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Adverse effects were seen in 17.14% of patients in group A and 20% of patients in group B.None of these effects was significant enough to discontinue therapy. The difference in adverse effects between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both itraconazole and terbinafine were equally effective and safe in the treatment of onychomycosis. Both drugs were well tolerated and were relatively free of major adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/4500669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/4500669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甲癣又称甲沟炎,是指甲部位的真菌感染。目的:比较伊曲康唑与特比萘芬治疗甲癣的疗效和安全性。研究设计:在2019年8月至2021年3月期间,对70名到SNMC阿格拉UP皮肤OPD就诊的甲癣患者进行了开放、随机、前瞻性临床比较研究。35名患者被随机分配到A组,接受口服伊曲康唑200毫克,每天一次,为期12周;B组的其他35名患者接受口服特比萘芬250毫克,每天一次,为期12周。结果A组(伊曲康唑)62.85%的患者真菌学治愈,51.43%的患者临床治愈;B组(特比萘芬)74.28%的患者真菌学治愈,62.86%的患者临床治愈。两组治愈率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组有17.14%的患者出现不良反应,B组有20%的患者出现不良反应。两组患者的不良反应差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论伊曲康唑和特比萘芬对治疗甲癣同样有效和安全。两种药物的耐受性都很好,而且相对来说都没有主要的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AN OPEN, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY DETERMINING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ITRACONAZOLE VERSUS TERBINAFINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSIS.
Background: Onychomycosis,also known as tinea unguium,is a fungal infection of nail unit. Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole versus terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis. Study Design: An open, randomized,prospective clinical comparative study was done on 70 patients of onychomycosis attending skin OPD of SNMC Agra UP during the period from august 2019 to march 2021. 35 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral itraconazole 200mg once a day for 12weeks in group A and other 35 patients received oral terbinafine 250mg once a day for 12weeks in group B.The patients were evaluated at the start of the therapy and thereafter at 4,8,12,24 weeks. Results: In group A (Itraconazole), 62.85% of patients showed mycological cure and 51.43% of patients showed clinical cure.In group B (Terbinafine), 74.28% of patients showed mycological cure and 62.86% of patients showed clinical cure. The difference in cure rates between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Adverse effects were seen in 17.14% of patients in group A and 20% of patients in group B.None of these effects was significant enough to discontinue therapy. The difference in adverse effects between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both itraconazole and terbinafine were equally effective and safe in the treatment of onychomycosis. Both drugs were well tolerated and were relatively free of major adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信