乌克兰和欧盟法律对合同格式的要求

Olena Сherniak, Sergii Panchenko, M. Stefanchuk, A. Kiryk, Tetiana Fedorenko
{"title":"乌克兰和欧盟法律对合同格式的要求","authors":"Olena Сherniak, Sergii Panchenko, M. Stefanchuk, A. Kiryk, Tetiana Fedorenko","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4179.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article was to determine the peculiarities of the legal norms concerning the form of the contract in the law of the European Union EU. For this purpose, the following methods were used: special-legal, analysis and synthesis, inductive, systemic, generalization, forecasting and comparative. The authors insist on the need to rethink conventional law through the prism of European contract law. Attention was paid to the desirability of refusing to regulate issues related to the form of the contract, without dividing into certain requirements for the form of contracts. It is emphasized that “soft law” acts themselves require in some cases a certain formality (for example, a written form on a durable medium) for a specific legal act, and national laws often require a written form or other formalities. Especially with regard to specific objects, in particular land and other real estate. Unilateral gift obligations and consumer contracts are cited as examples of restrictions to the requirements for the free choice of the form of the contract. It concludes by arguing for the importance of rethinking national approaches to understanding contract form and its legal simplification.","PeriodicalId":414722,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Políticas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements for Contract’s Form According to Ukrainian and EU Laws\",\"authors\":\"Olena Сherniak, Sergii Panchenko, M. Stefanchuk, A. Kiryk, Tetiana Fedorenko\",\"doi\":\"10.46398/cuestpol.4179.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article was to determine the peculiarities of the legal norms concerning the form of the contract in the law of the European Union EU. For this purpose, the following methods were used: special-legal, analysis and synthesis, inductive, systemic, generalization, forecasting and comparative. The authors insist on the need to rethink conventional law through the prism of European contract law. Attention was paid to the desirability of refusing to regulate issues related to the form of the contract, without dividing into certain requirements for the form of contracts. It is emphasized that “soft law” acts themselves require in some cases a certain formality (for example, a written form on a durable medium) for a specific legal act, and national laws often require a written form or other formalities. Especially with regard to specific objects, in particular land and other real estate. Unilateral gift obligations and consumer contracts are cited as examples of restrictions to the requirements for the free choice of the form of the contract. It concludes by arguing for the importance of rethinking national approaches to understanding contract form and its legal simplification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuestiones Políticas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuestiones Políticas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4179.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Políticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4179.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在确定欧盟法律中有关合同形式的法律规范的特殊性。为此采用了以下方法:特别法、分析与综合法、归纳法、系统法、概括法、预测法和比较法。作者坚持认为有必要通过欧洲合同法的棱镜重新思考传统法律。注意到了拒绝规范与合同形式有关的问题的可取性,而没有划分为对合同形式的某些要求。与会者强调,"软法律 "行为本身在某些情况下要求特定法律行为具有某种形式(例如,在持久媒介上的书面形式),而国家法律往往要求书面形式或其他手续。特别是在特定物方面,尤其是土地和其他不动产。本文列举了单方赠与义务和消费者合同作为限制自由选择合同形式要求的例子。报告最后认为,必须重新思考各国理解合同形式及其法律简化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requirements for Contract’s Form According to Ukrainian and EU Laws
The purpose of the article was to determine the peculiarities of the legal norms concerning the form of the contract in the law of the European Union EU. For this purpose, the following methods were used: special-legal, analysis and synthesis, inductive, systemic, generalization, forecasting and comparative. The authors insist on the need to rethink conventional law through the prism of European contract law. Attention was paid to the desirability of refusing to regulate issues related to the form of the contract, without dividing into certain requirements for the form of contracts. It is emphasized that “soft law” acts themselves require in some cases a certain formality (for example, a written form on a durable medium) for a specific legal act, and national laws often require a written form or other formalities. Especially with regard to specific objects, in particular land and other real estate. Unilateral gift obligations and consumer contracts are cited as examples of restrictions to the requirements for the free choice of the form of the contract. It concludes by arguing for the importance of rethinking national approaches to understanding contract form and its legal simplification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信