大学新生数字素养能力分析

Ji Youn Choi, Min Ok Kim
{"title":"大学新生数字素养能力分析","authors":"Ji Youn Choi, Min Ok Kim","doi":"10.37736/kjlr.2023.10.14.5.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study sought to find out the differences in digital literacy competency by gender and field of college freshmen and derive educational implications through an analysis of the influence between sub-elements of digital literacy competency. The research results are as follows. First, the average score for each sub-element of digital literacy competency was high for ethics and security, and low for affect and participation. Second, as a result of the gender difference analysis, values, self-regulation, and ethics showed higher average scores for female students and statistically significant results, and only critical reading showed higher average scores for male students. As a result of the series difference analysis, among all sub-elements, only self-regulation showed statistically significant results, and the average score of the social class was the highest. Third, as a result of the correlation analysis, just as ethics and security, values and self-efficacy, and emotions and participation showed a high correlation, the influence factors also showed a high relative influence on each other. Based on the results of this study, the need for parallel research with various variables and longitudinal research on digital literacy capabilities was suggested.","PeriodicalId":372781,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association for Literacy","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Digital Literacy Competency of University Freshmen\",\"authors\":\"Ji Youn Choi, Min Ok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.37736/kjlr.2023.10.14.5.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study sought to find out the differences in digital literacy competency by gender and field of college freshmen and derive educational implications through an analysis of the influence between sub-elements of digital literacy competency. The research results are as follows. First, the average score for each sub-element of digital literacy competency was high for ethics and security, and low for affect and participation. Second, as a result of the gender difference analysis, values, self-regulation, and ethics showed higher average scores for female students and statistically significant results, and only critical reading showed higher average scores for male students. As a result of the series difference analysis, among all sub-elements, only self-regulation showed statistically significant results, and the average score of the social class was the highest. Third, as a result of the correlation analysis, just as ethics and security, values and self-efficacy, and emotions and participation showed a high correlation, the influence factors also showed a high relative influence on each other. Based on the results of this study, the need for parallel research with various variables and longitudinal research on digital literacy capabilities was suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Association for Literacy\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Association for Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2023.10.14.5.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association for Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2023.10.14.5.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图找出不同性别和专业的大学新生在数字素养能力方面的差异,并通过分析数字素养能力各子要素之间的影响得出教育意义。研究结果如下。 首先,在数字素养能力的各个子要素中,道德和安全的平均得分较高,情感和参与的平均得分较低。 其次,性别差异分析结果显示,价值观、自我调节和伦理道德的女生平均得分较高,且有统计学意义,只有批判性阅读的男生平均得分较高。系列差异分析结果显示,在所有子要素中,只有自律的结果具有统计学意义,社会阶层的平均得分最高。 第三,相关性分析结果显示,正如道德与安全感、价值观与自我效能感、情感与参与感呈现出高度的相关性一样,各影响因素之间也呈现出高度的相对影响。 基于本研究的结果,建议有必要对数字素养能力进行各种变量的平行研究和纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Digital Literacy Competency of University Freshmen
This study sought to find out the differences in digital literacy competency by gender and field of college freshmen and derive educational implications through an analysis of the influence between sub-elements of digital literacy competency. The research results are as follows. First, the average score for each sub-element of digital literacy competency was high for ethics and security, and low for affect and participation. Second, as a result of the gender difference analysis, values, self-regulation, and ethics showed higher average scores for female students and statistically significant results, and only critical reading showed higher average scores for male students. As a result of the series difference analysis, among all sub-elements, only self-regulation showed statistically significant results, and the average score of the social class was the highest. Third, as a result of the correlation analysis, just as ethics and security, values and self-efficacy, and emotions and participation showed a high correlation, the influence factors also showed a high relative influence on each other. Based on the results of this study, the need for parallel research with various variables and longitudinal research on digital literacy capabilities was suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信