妊娠 39 周选择性引产与待产管理后产妇分娩相关并发症和新生儿结局的比较:系统回顾和元分析

James Hong, J. Atkinson, A. R. Mitchell, Stephen Tong, Susan P Walker, A. Middleton, A. Lindquist, R. Hastie
{"title":"妊娠 39 周选择性引产与待产管理后产妇分娩相关并发症和新生儿结局的比较:系统回顾和元分析","authors":"James Hong, J. Atkinson, A. R. Mitchell, Stephen Tong, Susan P Walker, A. Middleton, A. Lindquist, R. Hastie","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Abstracted from JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2313162) Induction of labor historically has been discouraged when there is no medical indication, such as for postterm pregnancies, suspected cases of poor fetal growth, prelabor rupture of membranes, or hypertension. This is because elective induction is associated with a higher risk of cesarean delivery (CD) and adverse birth outcomes than spontaneous labor.","PeriodicalId":144618,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"James Hong, J. Atkinson, A. R. Mitchell, Stephen Tong, Susan P Walker, A. Middleton, A. Lindquist, R. Hastie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(Abstracted from JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2313162) Induction of labor historically has been discouraged when there is no medical indication, such as for postterm pregnancies, suspected cases of poor fetal growth, prelabor rupture of membranes, or hypertension. This is because elective induction is associated with a higher risk of cesarean delivery (CD) and adverse birth outcomes than spontaneous labor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(摘自 JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2313162)在没有医学指征的情况下,如过期妊娠、疑似胎儿发育不良、产前胎膜破裂或高血压,历来不鼓励引产。这是因为与自然分娩相比,选择性引产具有更高的剖宫产(CD)风险和不良分娩结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
(Abstracted from JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2313162) Induction of labor historically has been discouraged when there is no medical indication, such as for postterm pregnancies, suspected cases of poor fetal growth, prelabor rupture of membranes, or hypertension. This is because elective induction is associated with a higher risk of cesarean delivery (CD) and adverse birth outcomes than spontaneous labor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信