2004 年苏门答腊-安达曼地震引起的共震电离层扰动

IF 2.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Shikha Vashisth, Sasi Kiran Gera, Ambikapathy Ammani, Priya Singh, Prabhat Pandey, Sindu Kumari, Delna Joy K, O.P. Mishra
{"title":"2004 年苏门答腊-安达曼地震引起的共震电离层扰动","authors":"Shikha Vashisth,&nbsp;Sasi Kiran Gera,&nbsp;Ambikapathy Ammani,&nbsp;Priya Singh,&nbsp;Prabhat Pandey,&nbsp;Sindu Kumari,&nbsp;Delna Joy K,&nbsp;O.P. Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.qsa.2023.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances (CID) due to the 26th December 2004 earthquake of Mw 9.2, which occurred in the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone, are analyzed using cGPS-aided Total Electron Content (TEC) measurements. For the CID analysis, data from nearby seven Sumatran GPS Array (SuGAr) and two International GNSS Stations (IGS) located to the south of the epicenter, at a distance of 500–1000km (near-field) and two IGS stations located to the north-west of the epicenter at a distance of 2000km (far-field) are considered. The CIDs with a propagation velocity of 595–694m/s arrived within 2–10min after the earthquake, depending upon the distance of a station from the epicentre. Variations in the CIDs can be prominently seen at the nearest cGPS Station SAMP immediately after the earthquake. NTUS, being the farthest station shows some small variations. The delay in the occurrence of variations at GPS sites can also be associated with rupture propagation. Because all the stations used in our analysis are located south of the epicenter and rupture of the earthquake propagated in the north, the trend of rupture propagation could not be analyzed clearly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34142,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000801/pdfft?md5=0099eb3b22a55c2ed22754cf28aad1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666033423000801-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-seismic ionospheric disturbances due to 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake\",\"authors\":\"Shikha Vashisth,&nbsp;Sasi Kiran Gera,&nbsp;Ambikapathy Ammani,&nbsp;Priya Singh,&nbsp;Prabhat Pandey,&nbsp;Sindu Kumari,&nbsp;Delna Joy K,&nbsp;O.P. Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qsa.2023.100148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances (CID) due to the 26th December 2004 earthquake of Mw 9.2, which occurred in the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone, are analyzed using cGPS-aided Total Electron Content (TEC) measurements. For the CID analysis, data from nearby seven Sumatran GPS Array (SuGAr) and two International GNSS Stations (IGS) located to the south of the epicenter, at a distance of 500–1000km (near-field) and two IGS stations located to the north-west of the epicenter at a distance of 2000km (far-field) are considered. The CIDs with a propagation velocity of 595–694m/s arrived within 2–10min after the earthquake, depending upon the distance of a station from the epicentre. Variations in the CIDs can be prominently seen at the nearest cGPS Station SAMP immediately after the earthquake. NTUS, being the farthest station shows some small variations. The delay in the occurrence of variations at GPS sites can also be associated with rupture propagation. Because all the stations used in our analysis are located south of the epicenter and rupture of the earthquake propagated in the north, the trend of rupture propagation could not be analyzed clearly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Science Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000801/pdfft?md5=0099eb3b22a55c2ed22754cf28aad1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666033423000801-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Science Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用 cGPS 辅助总电子含量(TEC)测量,分析了苏门答腊-安达曼俯冲带 2004 年 12 月 26 日发生的 9.2 级地震引起的共震电离层扰动(CID)。在进行 CID 分析时,考虑了震中南面距离 500-1000 公里(近场)的附近七个苏门答腊 GPS 阵列(SuGAr)和两个国际 GNSS 站(IGS)以及震中西北面距离 2000 公里(远场)的两个国际 GNSS 站的数据。传播速度为 595-694m/s 的 CID 在震后 2-10 分钟内到达,具体时间取决于台站与震中的距离。最近的 cGPS 站点 SAMP 在地震发生后立即出现了明显的 CID 变化。距离震中最远的 NTUS 站也出现了一些微小的变化。GPS 站点出现变化的延迟也可能与断裂传播有关。由于我们分析中使用的所有站点都位于震中以南,而地震波向北传播,因此无法清楚地分析地震波传播的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-seismic ionospheric disturbances due to 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake

The Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances (CID) due to the 26th December 2004 earthquake of Mw 9.2, which occurred in the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone, are analyzed using cGPS-aided Total Electron Content (TEC) measurements. For the CID analysis, data from nearby seven Sumatran GPS Array (SuGAr) and two International GNSS Stations (IGS) located to the south of the epicenter, at a distance of 500–1000km (near-field) and two IGS stations located to the north-west of the epicenter at a distance of 2000km (far-field) are considered. The CIDs with a propagation velocity of 595–694m/s arrived within 2–10min after the earthquake, depending upon the distance of a station from the epicentre. Variations in the CIDs can be prominently seen at the nearest cGPS Station SAMP immediately after the earthquake. NTUS, being the farthest station shows some small variations. The delay in the occurrence of variations at GPS sites can also be associated with rupture propagation. Because all the stations used in our analysis are located south of the epicenter and rupture of the earthquake propagated in the north, the trend of rupture propagation could not be analyzed clearly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Advances
Quaternary Science Advances Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信