法外市场冲突解决

Permata Jali Dimasiosz, A. Afrizal, Elfitra Elfitra
{"title":"法外市场冲突解决","authors":"Permata Jali Dimasiosz, A. Afrizal, Elfitra Elfitra","doi":"10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.7468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spatial conflict that occurred at Pasar Raya Padang involved parking attendtants, street vendors and shop traders who fought to control the same space. Lefebvre's theory is use to describe the struggle for space as a cause of conflict and Benda-Beckmann's theory to explain behavior in using conflict resolution forums. Through a qualitative approach and data analysis based on primary and secondary sources, this research evaluates the effectiveness of conflict resolution methods adopted by the City Government and seeks alternative solutions through external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM. The results show that conflict resolution and regulatory enforcement carried out by the City Government are not optimal, triggering conflict escalation. This has not yet reached a resolution, but external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM play an important role in supervising the implementation of regulations by the City Government and encouraging conflict resolution. Apart from that, this research also found that even though the cancellation or substantive changes to the rules have not been made, this external forum plays an important role in ensuring the safety of trading in the market. This shows that resolving space conflicts does not only involve changing rules, but also monitoring the implementation of existing rules. In terms of implementation, the results can be a recommendation for city governments to involve external forums in resolving spatial conflicts, especially in traditional markets. The results can also be a reference for other researchers who are interested in studying spatial conflict in a similar context. The novelty of this research lies in the discovery of the importance of external forums in monitoring the implementation of policies and conflict resolution mechanisms by city governments, something that has not been found in many previous studies examining spatial conflicts in traditional markets.","PeriodicalId":31651,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan","volume":"45 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extrajudicial Market Conflict Resolution\",\"authors\":\"Permata Jali Dimasiosz, A. Afrizal, Elfitra Elfitra\",\"doi\":\"10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.7468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The spatial conflict that occurred at Pasar Raya Padang involved parking attendtants, street vendors and shop traders who fought to control the same space. Lefebvre's theory is use to describe the struggle for space as a cause of conflict and Benda-Beckmann's theory to explain behavior in using conflict resolution forums. Through a qualitative approach and data analysis based on primary and secondary sources, this research evaluates the effectiveness of conflict resolution methods adopted by the City Government and seeks alternative solutions through external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM. The results show that conflict resolution and regulatory enforcement carried out by the City Government are not optimal, triggering conflict escalation. This has not yet reached a resolution, but external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM play an important role in supervising the implementation of regulations by the City Government and encouraging conflict resolution. Apart from that, this research also found that even though the cancellation or substantive changes to the rules have not been made, this external forum plays an important role in ensuring the safety of trading in the market. This shows that resolving space conflicts does not only involve changing rules, but also monitoring the implementation of existing rules. In terms of implementation, the results can be a recommendation for city governments to involve external forums in resolving spatial conflicts, especially in traditional markets. The results can also be a reference for other researchers who are interested in studying spatial conflict in a similar context. The novelty of this research lies in the discovery of the importance of external forums in monitoring the implementation of policies and conflict resolution mechanisms by city governments, something that has not been found in many previous studies examining spatial conflicts in traditional markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan\",\"volume\":\"45 6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.7468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.7468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发生在巴东拉亚路的空间冲突涉及停车管理员、街头小贩和商店商人,他们为控制同一空间而争斗。Lefebvre 的理论被用来描述空间争夺作为冲突原因的情况,Benda-Beckmann 的理论被用来解释使用冲突解决论坛的行为。本研究通过定性方法和基于主要和次要资料来源的数据分析,评估了市政府采用的冲突解决方法的有效性,并通过人民代表院、监察员和国家人权委员会等外部论坛寻求替代解决方案。结果表明,由市政府实施的冲突解决和监管执法并不理想,引发了冲突升级。这一问题尚未得到解决,但人民代表院、监察员和印尼国家人权委员会等外部论坛在监督市政府执行法规和鼓励解决冲突方面发挥了重要作用。除此之外,本研究还发现,尽管没有取消或实质性修改规则,但这一外部论坛在确保市场交易安全方面发挥了重要作用。这说明,解决空间冲突不仅要修改规则,还要监督现有规则的执行情况。在实施方面,研究结果可以为城市政府提供建议,让外部论坛参与解决空间冲突,尤其是在传统市场中。研究结果也可为其他有兴趣在类似背景下研究空间冲突的研究人员提供参考。本研究的新颖之处在于发现了外部论坛在监督城市政府执行政策和冲突解决机制方面的重要性,而这在以往许多研究传统市场空间冲突的研究中都没有发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extrajudicial Market Conflict Resolution
The spatial conflict that occurred at Pasar Raya Padang involved parking attendtants, street vendors and shop traders who fought to control the same space. Lefebvre's theory is use to describe the struggle for space as a cause of conflict and Benda-Beckmann's theory to explain behavior in using conflict resolution forums. Through a qualitative approach and data analysis based on primary and secondary sources, this research evaluates the effectiveness of conflict resolution methods adopted by the City Government and seeks alternative solutions through external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM. The results show that conflict resolution and regulatory enforcement carried out by the City Government are not optimal, triggering conflict escalation. This has not yet reached a resolution, but external forums such as the DPRD, Ombudsman and Komnas HAM play an important role in supervising the implementation of regulations by the City Government and encouraging conflict resolution. Apart from that, this research also found that even though the cancellation or substantive changes to the rules have not been made, this external forum plays an important role in ensuring the safety of trading in the market. This shows that resolving space conflicts does not only involve changing rules, but also monitoring the implementation of existing rules. In terms of implementation, the results can be a recommendation for city governments to involve external forums in resolving spatial conflicts, especially in traditional markets. The results can also be a reference for other researchers who are interested in studying spatial conflict in a similar context. The novelty of this research lies in the discovery of the importance of external forums in monitoring the implementation of policies and conflict resolution mechanisms by city governments, something that has not been found in many previous studies examining spatial conflicts in traditional markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信