关于爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森悖论的 ChatGPT

Jiří Stávek
{"title":"关于爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森悖论的 ChatGPT","authors":"Jiří Stávek","doi":"10.24018/ejphysics.2023.5.6.284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is my first attempt to communicate with the ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. ChatGPT reacted promptly with a good overview of this very wide topic. ChatGPT during our half hour conversation concluded that there is still room for the further development of the EPR paradox because this research field is far from the final theory. However, ChatGPT was skeptical to search for the missing element of the physical reality in papers of Old Masters working between 17th and 19th centuries. (One potential candidate for a more general physical theory of the EPR paradox can be found in the overlooked works of Old Masters working in the period of the 17th–19th centuries).","PeriodicalId":292629,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physics","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox\",\"authors\":\"Jiří Stávek\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejphysics.2023.5.6.284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is my first attempt to communicate with the ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. ChatGPT reacted promptly with a good overview of this very wide topic. ChatGPT during our half hour conversation concluded that there is still room for the further development of the EPR paradox because this research field is far from the final theory. However, ChatGPT was skeptical to search for the missing element of the physical reality in papers of Old Masters working between 17th and 19th centuries. (One potential candidate for a more general physical theory of the EPR paradox can be found in the overlooked works of Old Masters working in the period of the 17th–19th centuries).\",\"PeriodicalId\":292629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2023.5.6.284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2023.5.6.284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是我第一次尝试与 ChatGPT 就爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森悖论进行交流。ChatGPT 反应迅速,对这个非常广泛的话题进行了很好的概述。在我们半小时的对话中,ChatGPT 得出结论:EPR 悖论仍有进一步发展的空间,因为这一研究领域离最终理论还很遥远。不过,ChatGPT 对在 17 至 19 世纪老大师的论文中寻找物理现实中缺失的元素持怀疑态度。(EPR悖论的更一般的物理理论的一个潜在候选者可以在 17-19 世纪老大师们被忽视的作品中找到)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
This is my first attempt to communicate with the ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. ChatGPT reacted promptly with a good overview of this very wide topic. ChatGPT during our half hour conversation concluded that there is still room for the further development of the EPR paradox because this research field is far from the final theory. However, ChatGPT was skeptical to search for the missing element of the physical reality in papers of Old Masters working between 17th and 19th centuries. (One potential candidate for a more general physical theory of the EPR paradox can be found in the overlooked works of Old Masters working in the period of the 17th–19th centuries).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信