伊斯兰银行业的支持者和反对者:高等教育委员会批准的研究期刊上发表的文章所持立场概述

Saba Aorangzaib, Tooba Khalid Noori, Tahira Munawar
{"title":"伊斯兰银行业的支持者和反对者:高等教育委员会批准的研究期刊上发表的文章所持立场概述","authors":"Saba Aorangzaib, Tooba Khalid Noori, Tahira Munawar","doi":"10.53762/alqamar.06.04.e02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic banking is a financial system that adheres to the principles of Sharia law, which prohibits the charging of interest. Scholars have differing perspectives on Islamic banking, with some arguing that it is a more ethical and sustainable form of banking, while others contend that it is not truly interest-free or transparent. This paper critically examines the perspectives of various scholars on Islamic banking as presented in HEC recognized journals. First school of thought, represented by Dr. Fazlurrehman, distinguishes between riba and commercial interest. They do not consider commercial interest to be riba, and therefore believe that conventional banking is not in conflict with Islamic teachings. A second school of thought, represented by Mufti Taqi Usmani, Prof. Khurshid Ahmed, and others, advocates for the Islamization of the conventional banking system. They believe that banks can be modified in accordance with Islamic teachings to create a more ethical and interest free financial system. On the other hand, Mufti Rashid Ahmed and Mufti Dr. Abdul Wahid, views Islamic banking as a positive development for Muslims, but does not believe that the current Islamic banking system is fully based on Islamic law. They have proposed suggestions for how the system can be made more acceptable. A third school of thought, represented by Dr Muhammad Zahid Siddique Mughal and others, completely rejects Islamic banking. They argue that there is no real difference between conventional and Islamic banking. There are many reasons why scholars have different opinions about Islamic banking. One reason is that there are different arguments presented in Islamic law about the prohibition of interest. Another reason is that there are different methods of Islamic banking and scholars have different opinions about these methods. These opinions vary depending on social, and economic factors. However, there is no doubt that it is a growing field, with Islamic banks operating in over 75 countries around the world.","PeriodicalId":165966,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qamar","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proponents and Opponents of Islamic Banking: An Overview of the Stances adopted in the Articles published in HEC Approved Research Journals\",\"authors\":\"Saba Aorangzaib, Tooba Khalid Noori, Tahira Munawar\",\"doi\":\"10.53762/alqamar.06.04.e02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Islamic banking is a financial system that adheres to the principles of Sharia law, which prohibits the charging of interest. Scholars have differing perspectives on Islamic banking, with some arguing that it is a more ethical and sustainable form of banking, while others contend that it is not truly interest-free or transparent. This paper critically examines the perspectives of various scholars on Islamic banking as presented in HEC recognized journals. First school of thought, represented by Dr. Fazlurrehman, distinguishes between riba and commercial interest. They do not consider commercial interest to be riba, and therefore believe that conventional banking is not in conflict with Islamic teachings. A second school of thought, represented by Mufti Taqi Usmani, Prof. Khurshid Ahmed, and others, advocates for the Islamization of the conventional banking system. They believe that banks can be modified in accordance with Islamic teachings to create a more ethical and interest free financial system. On the other hand, Mufti Rashid Ahmed and Mufti Dr. Abdul Wahid, views Islamic banking as a positive development for Muslims, but does not believe that the current Islamic banking system is fully based on Islamic law. They have proposed suggestions for how the system can be made more acceptable. A third school of thought, represented by Dr Muhammad Zahid Siddique Mughal and others, completely rejects Islamic banking. They argue that there is no real difference between conventional and Islamic banking. There are many reasons why scholars have different opinions about Islamic banking. One reason is that there are different arguments presented in Islamic law about the prohibition of interest. Another reason is that there are different methods of Islamic banking and scholars have different opinions about these methods. These opinions vary depending on social, and economic factors. However, there is no doubt that it is a growing field, with Islamic banks operating in over 75 countries around the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Qamar\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Qamar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.06.04.e02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qamar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.06.04.e02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰银行是一种遵守伊斯兰教法原则的金融体系,伊斯兰教法禁止收取利息。学者们对伊斯兰银行有不同的看法,有些人认为伊斯兰银行是一种更合乎道德、更可持续的银行形式,而另一些人则认为伊斯兰银行并非真正无息或透明。本文批判性地研究了高等商学院认可的期刊中不同学者对伊斯兰银行业的观点。以法兹卢勒赫曼博士为代表的第一派别区分了利巴和商业利益。他们不认为商业利益是利巴,因此认为传统银行业务与伊斯兰教义并不冲突。以 Mufti Taqi Usmani、Khurshid Ahmed 教授等人为代表的第二派主张将传统银行系统伊斯兰化。他们认为,可以根据伊斯兰教义对银行进行改造,以创建一个更加合乎道德、无息的金融体系。另一方面,穆夫提-拉希德-艾哈迈德和穆夫提-阿卜杜勒-瓦希德博士认为伊斯兰银行业对穆斯林来说是一个积极的发展,但并不认为目前的伊斯兰银行系统完全以伊斯兰法为基础。他们就如何使该系统更容易被接受提出了建议。 以 Muhammad Zahid Siddique Mughal 博士等人为代表的第三派则完全反对伊斯兰银行业。他们认为,传统银行业和伊斯兰银行业没有真正的区别。学者们对伊斯兰银行有不同看法的原因有很多。原因之一是伊斯兰教法对禁止利息有不同的论点。另一个原因是伊斯兰银行有不同的方法,学者们对这些方法有不同的看法。这些观点因社会和经济因素而异。然而,毫无疑问,伊斯兰银行是一个不断发展的领域,在全世界超过 75 个国家开展业务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proponents and Opponents of Islamic Banking: An Overview of the Stances adopted in the Articles published in HEC Approved Research Journals
Islamic banking is a financial system that adheres to the principles of Sharia law, which prohibits the charging of interest. Scholars have differing perspectives on Islamic banking, with some arguing that it is a more ethical and sustainable form of banking, while others contend that it is not truly interest-free or transparent. This paper critically examines the perspectives of various scholars on Islamic banking as presented in HEC recognized journals. First school of thought, represented by Dr. Fazlurrehman, distinguishes between riba and commercial interest. They do not consider commercial interest to be riba, and therefore believe that conventional banking is not in conflict with Islamic teachings. A second school of thought, represented by Mufti Taqi Usmani, Prof. Khurshid Ahmed, and others, advocates for the Islamization of the conventional banking system. They believe that banks can be modified in accordance with Islamic teachings to create a more ethical and interest free financial system. On the other hand, Mufti Rashid Ahmed and Mufti Dr. Abdul Wahid, views Islamic banking as a positive development for Muslims, but does not believe that the current Islamic banking system is fully based on Islamic law. They have proposed suggestions for how the system can be made more acceptable. A third school of thought, represented by Dr Muhammad Zahid Siddique Mughal and others, completely rejects Islamic banking. They argue that there is no real difference between conventional and Islamic banking. There are many reasons why scholars have different opinions about Islamic banking. One reason is that there are different arguments presented in Islamic law about the prohibition of interest. Another reason is that there are different methods of Islamic banking and scholars have different opinions about these methods. These opinions vary depending on social, and economic factors. However, there is no doubt that it is a growing field, with Islamic banks operating in over 75 countries around the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信