政党才是关键"?工党的崛起与英国大选中的女政治家形象,约 1929-1950 年

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
David Thackeray, Lisa Berry-Waite
{"title":"政党才是关键\"?工党的崛起与英国大选中的女政治家形象,约 1929-1950 年","authors":"David Thackeray,&nbsp;Lisa Berry-Waite","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.12756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article uses election addresses to consider how the early women parliamentary candidates sought to make their case to English voters. It then explores the insights that Mass Observation's election surveys offer into public attitudes to women politicians, and gender and political leadership more broadly, from the late 1930s to the early 1950s. While the pioneer female candidates argued that they should have more representatives at Westminster to better uphold the ‘woman's point of view’ this approach was gradually undermined from the 1920s onwards with the growth of programmatic politics led by Labour. Mass Observation found that voters claimed to focus more on which party had the best programme rather than the personalities of candidates. However, their findings also indicate that women candidates continued to face many additional prejudices which their male opponents did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"37 2","pages":"684-699"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.12756","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It's the party that counts’? The Rise of Labour and the Image of the Woman Politician at English Elections, c.1929–1950\",\"authors\":\"David Thackeray,&nbsp;Lisa Berry-Waite\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0424.12756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article uses election addresses to consider how the early women parliamentary candidates sought to make their case to English voters. It then explores the insights that Mass Observation's election surveys offer into public attitudes to women politicians, and gender and political leadership more broadly, from the late 1930s to the early 1950s. While the pioneer female candidates argued that they should have more representatives at Westminster to better uphold the ‘woman's point of view’ this approach was gradually undermined from the 1920s onwards with the growth of programmatic politics led by Labour. Mass Observation found that voters claimed to focus more on which party had the best programme rather than the personalities of candidates. However, their findings also indicate that women candidates continued to face many additional prejudices which their male opponents did not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and History\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"684-699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.12756\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.12756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.12756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过选举演讲来探讨早期的女议员候选人是如何向英国选民进行宣传的。然后,文章探讨了《大众观察》的选举调查对 20 世纪 30 年代末至 50 年代初公众对女性政治家的态度以及更广泛的性别和政治领导力的影响。先驱女性候选人认为,她们应该在威斯敏斯特有更多的代表,以更好地维护 "女性观点",但从 20 世纪 20 年代起,随着工党领导的纲领性政治的发展,这种观点逐渐被削弱。大众观察》发现,选民更关注的是哪个政党有最好的纲领,而不是候选人的个性。然而,他们的调查结果表明,女性候选人仍然面临着许多额外的偏见,而她们的男性对手则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘It's the party that counts’? The Rise of Labour and the Image of the Woman Politician at English Elections, c.1929–1950

This article uses election addresses to consider how the early women parliamentary candidates sought to make their case to English voters. It then explores the insights that Mass Observation's election surveys offer into public attitudes to women politicians, and gender and political leadership more broadly, from the late 1930s to the early 1950s. While the pioneer female candidates argued that they should have more representatives at Westminster to better uphold the ‘woman's point of view’ this approach was gradually undermined from the 1920s onwards with the growth of programmatic politics led by Labour. Mass Observation found that voters claimed to focus more on which party had the best programme rather than the personalities of candidates. However, their findings also indicate that women candidates continued to face many additional prejudices which their male opponents did not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and History
Gender and History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信