复发性无并发症尿路感染患者对传统一线抗生素联合三唑和新型抗生素的敏感性比较

Husnain Qadir, S. Suleman, Shiekh Fahad Falah, Muhammad Saleh Faisal, H. Sadia, Kamran Ullah
{"title":"复发性无并发症尿路感染患者对传统一线抗生素联合三唑和新型抗生素的敏感性比较","authors":"Husnain Qadir, S. Suleman, Shiekh Fahad Falah, Muhammad Saleh Faisal, H. Sadia, Kamran Ullah","doi":"10.52764/jms.23.31.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The current study aims to evaluate the susceptibility pattern of relatively older antibiotic Co-trimoxazole and its comparison with Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, and the Postgraduate Medical Education Department of Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar from April 2022 to September 2022. Both male and female patients, above the age of 15 years with recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections were included in the study. The samples were inoculated onto CLED (Cystine-Lactose-Electrolyte-Deficient) Agar, a differential culture medium. The grown bacteria were identified, using Gram staining and BIOMÉRIEUX® API® 10S kits. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by the Agar dilution method; as per standard protocol. The results were compared among Co-trimoxazole, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin using statistical tests. Results: A total of 680 samples were received, of which 158 samples were culture-positive. The gender distribution of females and males was 63.3% and 36.7%, respectively. A predominant proportion of the patient cohort manifested within the age range of 21-40 years, with the subsequent highest representation observed in the 41-60 year age group. The isolated organisms were E. coli (74.1%), Klebsiella (10.8%), Pseudomonas (5.1%), Enterococci (6.3%), Proteus species (2.5%), and Citrobacter (1.3%). Based on MIC analysis, 77.2% of isolates were found to be sensitive to Co-trimoxazole, 52.5% to Levofloxacin, 86.7% to Nitrofurantoin, and 90.5% to Fosfomycin. When comparing antibiotics, Co-trimoxazole displayed significantly higher effectiveness against the isolates compared to Levofloxacin (p-value 0.004). However, in comparison to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin, Co-trimoxazole exhibited lower effectiveness, with respective p-values of 0.000 and 0.007. Conclusion: The study revealed that the susceptibility of bacterial isolates to Co-trimoxazole is significantly higher than that to Levofloxacin but lower than that to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin.   KEYWORDS Urinary Tract Infections, Drug Resistance, Culture And Sensitivity, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration","PeriodicalId":16486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF SUSCEPTIBILITY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL FIRST LINE ANTIBIOTIC CO-TRIMOXAZOLE AND NEWER ANTIBIOTICS IN RECURRENT UNCOMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS\",\"authors\":\"Husnain Qadir, S. Suleman, Shiekh Fahad Falah, Muhammad Saleh Faisal, H. Sadia, Kamran Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.52764/jms.23.31.4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The current study aims to evaluate the susceptibility pattern of relatively older antibiotic Co-trimoxazole and its comparison with Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, and the Postgraduate Medical Education Department of Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar from April 2022 to September 2022. Both male and female patients, above the age of 15 years with recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections were included in the study. The samples were inoculated onto CLED (Cystine-Lactose-Electrolyte-Deficient) Agar, a differential culture medium. The grown bacteria were identified, using Gram staining and BIOMÉRIEUX® API® 10S kits. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by the Agar dilution method; as per standard protocol. The results were compared among Co-trimoxazole, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin using statistical tests. Results: A total of 680 samples were received, of which 158 samples were culture-positive. The gender distribution of females and males was 63.3% and 36.7%, respectively. A predominant proportion of the patient cohort manifested within the age range of 21-40 years, with the subsequent highest representation observed in the 41-60 year age group. The isolated organisms were E. coli (74.1%), Klebsiella (10.8%), Pseudomonas (5.1%), Enterococci (6.3%), Proteus species (2.5%), and Citrobacter (1.3%). Based on MIC analysis, 77.2% of isolates were found to be sensitive to Co-trimoxazole, 52.5% to Levofloxacin, 86.7% to Nitrofurantoin, and 90.5% to Fosfomycin. When comparing antibiotics, Co-trimoxazole displayed significantly higher effectiveness against the isolates compared to Levofloxacin (p-value 0.004). However, in comparison to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin, Co-trimoxazole exhibited lower effectiveness, with respective p-values of 0.000 and 0.007. Conclusion: The study revealed that the susceptibility of bacterial isolates to Co-trimoxazole is significantly higher than that to Levofloxacin but lower than that to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin.   KEYWORDS Urinary Tract Infections, Drug Resistance, Culture And Sensitivity, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration\",\"PeriodicalId\":16486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.23.31.4.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.23.31.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估相对较老的抗生素复方新诺明的药敏模式,并将其与左氧氟沙星、硝基呋喃妥因和磷霉素进行比较。材料与方法:这项横断面研究于 2022 年 4 月至 2022 年 9 月在马尔丹的马尔丹医疗中心(Mardan Medical Complex)和白沙瓦开伯尔女子医学院(Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar)的研究生医学教育部(Postgraduate Medical Education Department)进行。研究对象包括 15 岁以上反复发作无并发症尿路感染的男性和女性患者。将样本接种到差异培养基 CLED(胱氨酸-乳糖-电解质缺乏)琼脂上。使用革兰氏染色法和 BIOMÉRIEUX® API® 10S 试剂盒对培养出的细菌进行鉴定。按照标准方案,采用琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。使用统计检验比较了复方新诺明、左氧氟沙星、硝基呋喃妥因和磷霉素的作用结果。结果共收到 680 份样本,其中 158 份样本培养呈阳性。女性和男性的性别比例分别为 63.3% 和 36.7%。患者年龄主要集中在 21-40 岁之间,其次是 41-60 岁年龄组。分离出的微生物包括大肠杆菌(74.1%)、克雷伯氏菌(10.8%)、假单胞菌(5.1%)、肠球菌(6.3%)、变形杆菌(2.5%)和枸橼酸杆菌(1.3%)。根据 MIC 分析,77.2% 的分离菌株对联合曲霉毒素敏感,52.5% 对左氧氟沙星敏感,86.7% 对硝基呋喃妥因敏感,90.5% 对磷霉素敏感。在对抗生素进行比较时,与左氧氟沙星相比,复方新诺明对分离菌的有效性明显更高(p 值为 0.004)。然而,与硝基呋喃妥因和磷霉素相比,联合曲霉毒素的效力较低,p 值分别为 0.000 和 0.007。结论研究表明,细菌分离物对联-曲唑的敏感性明显高于对左氧氟沙星的敏感性,但低于对硝基呋喃妥因和磷霉素的敏感性。 关键词:尿路感染 耐药性 培养和敏感性 最低抑菌浓度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF SUSCEPTIBILITY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL FIRST LINE ANTIBIOTIC CO-TRIMOXAZOLE AND NEWER ANTIBIOTICS IN RECURRENT UNCOMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS
Objective: The current study aims to evaluate the susceptibility pattern of relatively older antibiotic Co-trimoxazole and its comparison with Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, and the Postgraduate Medical Education Department of Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar from April 2022 to September 2022. Both male and female patients, above the age of 15 years with recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections were included in the study. The samples were inoculated onto CLED (Cystine-Lactose-Electrolyte-Deficient) Agar, a differential culture medium. The grown bacteria were identified, using Gram staining and BIOMÉRIEUX® API® 10S kits. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by the Agar dilution method; as per standard protocol. The results were compared among Co-trimoxazole, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, and Fosfomycin using statistical tests. Results: A total of 680 samples were received, of which 158 samples were culture-positive. The gender distribution of females and males was 63.3% and 36.7%, respectively. A predominant proportion of the patient cohort manifested within the age range of 21-40 years, with the subsequent highest representation observed in the 41-60 year age group. The isolated organisms were E. coli (74.1%), Klebsiella (10.8%), Pseudomonas (5.1%), Enterococci (6.3%), Proteus species (2.5%), and Citrobacter (1.3%). Based on MIC analysis, 77.2% of isolates were found to be sensitive to Co-trimoxazole, 52.5% to Levofloxacin, 86.7% to Nitrofurantoin, and 90.5% to Fosfomycin. When comparing antibiotics, Co-trimoxazole displayed significantly higher effectiveness against the isolates compared to Levofloxacin (p-value 0.004). However, in comparison to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin, Co-trimoxazole exhibited lower effectiveness, with respective p-values of 0.000 and 0.007. Conclusion: The study revealed that the susceptibility of bacterial isolates to Co-trimoxazole is significantly higher than that to Levofloxacin but lower than that to Nitrofurantoin and Fosfomycin.   KEYWORDS Urinary Tract Infections, Drug Resistance, Culture And Sensitivity, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信