Heather N. Fedesco, Ella Rose Kraner, Erin L. Dolan
{"title":"评估参与导师评估以改善博士生导师关系的可行性、实用性和影响","authors":"Heather N. Fedesco, Ella Rose Kraner, Erin L. Dolan","doi":"10.1002/tl.20572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a mentorship assessment structure designed to improve doctoral student‐research advisor mentoring relationships. We report the experiences of students and advisors as they completed the process to assess the feasibility, utility, and impact of engaging in mentorship assessment.","PeriodicalId":35492,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the feasibility, utility, and impact of engaging in mentorship assessment to improve doctoral mentoring relationships\",\"authors\":\"Heather N. Fedesco, Ella Rose Kraner, Erin L. Dolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tl.20572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes a mentorship assessment structure designed to improve doctoral student‐research advisor mentoring relationships. We report the experiences of students and advisors as they completed the process to assess the feasibility, utility, and impact of engaging in mentorship assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Directions for Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Directions for Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the feasibility, utility, and impact of engaging in mentorship assessment to improve doctoral mentoring relationships
This article describes a mentorship assessment structure designed to improve doctoral student‐research advisor mentoring relationships. We report the experiences of students and advisors as they completed the process to assess the feasibility, utility, and impact of engaging in mentorship assessment.
期刊介绍:
New Directions for Teaching and Learning continues to offer a comprehensive range of ideas and techniques for improving college teaching based on the experience of seasoned instructors and the latest findings of educational and psychological researchers.