铅暴露仍然是贝多芬失聪的最佳解释吗?

{"title":"铅暴露仍然是贝多芬失聪的最佳解释吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.54289/jcrmh2300133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: An article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic. In addition, bone samples that contained high levels of lead have also been discovered to be inauthentic. This communication is a response to this as well as other challenges to the article in The Laryngoscope in 2013 about lead and the hearing loss of Ludwig van Beethoven. Methods: An in-depth review of these articles was accomplished to assess whether lead poisoning is still a viable theory for Beethoven’s hearing loss. Results: A substantial review of over 2000 cases in 2016 showed uniformly abnormal auditory brainstem responses with chronic lead poisoning that correlate well with the shrunken cochlear nerves found at Beethoven’s autopsy. An article published in 2017 postulated a new reason for Paget’s Disease, but has serious deficiencies. The current case of lead poisoning in The Laryngoscope in 2020 supports lead as a cause significant hearing loss. In 2022 a suggestion of congenital syphilis was found to lack substantial evidence. Although the article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic, no authentic samples have ever been tested for lead. Therefore, this is a premature opinion. Conclusion: Future directions listed in the Current Biology article include testing for exposure to environmental causes of disease. We will therefore wait with great anticipation to the analyses of authentic hair samples. It may not be surprising that these will also show high levels of lead. If they do not, all of the suggested reasons for Beethoven’s hearing loss will have major problems, and we may never fulfill his wish to discover the etiology of his loss.","PeriodicalId":507376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Case Reports and Medical History","volume":"PC-18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Lead Exposure Still The Best Explanation For Beethoven’s Deafness?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.54289/jcrmh2300133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: An article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic. In addition, bone samples that contained high levels of lead have also been discovered to be inauthentic. This communication is a response to this as well as other challenges to the article in The Laryngoscope in 2013 about lead and the hearing loss of Ludwig van Beethoven. Methods: An in-depth review of these articles was accomplished to assess whether lead poisoning is still a viable theory for Beethoven’s hearing loss. Results: A substantial review of over 2000 cases in 2016 showed uniformly abnormal auditory brainstem responses with chronic lead poisoning that correlate well with the shrunken cochlear nerves found at Beethoven’s autopsy. An article published in 2017 postulated a new reason for Paget’s Disease, but has serious deficiencies. The current case of lead poisoning in The Laryngoscope in 2020 supports lead as a cause significant hearing loss. In 2022 a suggestion of congenital syphilis was found to lack substantial evidence. Although the article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic, no authentic samples have ever been tested for lead. Therefore, this is a premature opinion. Conclusion: Future directions listed in the Current Biology article include testing for exposure to environmental causes of disease. We will therefore wait with great anticipation to the analyses of authentic hair samples. It may not be surprising that these will also show high levels of lead. If they do not, all of the suggested reasons for Beethoven’s hearing loss will have major problems, and we may never fulfill his wish to discover the etiology of his loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Case Reports and Medical History\",\"volume\":\"PC-18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Case Reports and Medical History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54289/jcrmh2300133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Case Reports and Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54289/jcrmh2300133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2023 年 3 月《当代生物学》杂志上的一篇文章认为,铅中毒不适用于贝多芬,因为希勒锁被发现是假的。此外,含铅量较高的骨头样本也被发现是假的。2013 年,《喉镜》上发表了一篇关于铅和路德维希-凡-贝多芬听力损失的文章,本通讯就是对这一观点以及其他质疑的回应。方法:我们对这些文章进行了深入回顾,以评估铅中毒是否仍是贝多芬听力损失的可行理论。结果:2016 年对 2000 多个病例进行的大量回顾显示,慢性铅中毒导致的听性脑干反应异常与贝多芬尸检时发现的耳蜗神经萎缩有很好的相关性。2017 年发表的一篇文章推测了帕盖特氏病的新原因,但存在严重不足。2020 年,《喉镜》(The Laryngoscope)杂志上刊登的铅中毒病例支持铅是导致重大听力损失的原因之一。2022 年,关于先天性梅毒的说法缺乏实质性证据。尽管 2023 年 3 月《当代生物学》上的文章认为铅中毒不适用于贝多芬,因为发现希勒锁是假的,但从未对任何真品样本进行过铅检测。因此,这种观点为时尚早。结论当代生物学》文章中列出的未来发展方向包括检测环境致病因素。因此,我们将满怀期待地等待对真实头发样本的分析。如果这些样本也显示铅含量较高,也不足为奇。否则,贝多芬听力损失的所有原因都将出现重大问题,我们可能永远无法实现贝多芬发现听力损失病因的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Lead Exposure Still The Best Explanation For Beethoven’s Deafness?
Objectives: An article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic. In addition, bone samples that contained high levels of lead have also been discovered to be inauthentic. This communication is a response to this as well as other challenges to the article in The Laryngoscope in 2013 about lead and the hearing loss of Ludwig van Beethoven. Methods: An in-depth review of these articles was accomplished to assess whether lead poisoning is still a viable theory for Beethoven’s hearing loss. Results: A substantial review of over 2000 cases in 2016 showed uniformly abnormal auditory brainstem responses with chronic lead poisoning that correlate well with the shrunken cochlear nerves found at Beethoven’s autopsy. An article published in 2017 postulated a new reason for Paget’s Disease, but has serious deficiencies. The current case of lead poisoning in The Laryngoscope in 2020 supports lead as a cause significant hearing loss. In 2022 a suggestion of congenital syphilis was found to lack substantial evidence. Although the article in Current Biology in March 2023 suggested that lead poisoning does not apply to Beethoven because the Hiller lock was found to be inauthentic, no authentic samples have ever been tested for lead. Therefore, this is a premature opinion. Conclusion: Future directions listed in the Current Biology article include testing for exposure to environmental causes of disease. We will therefore wait with great anticipation to the analyses of authentic hair samples. It may not be surprising that these will also show high levels of lead. If they do not, all of the suggested reasons for Beethoven’s hearing loss will have major problems, and we may never fulfill his wish to discover the etiology of his loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信