对侧唾液腺的结构组织

A. Shchipskiy, P. N. Mukhin, Dmitriy M. Akinfiev, M. M. Kalimatova, Anara А. Agalarova
{"title":"对侧唾液腺的结构组织","authors":"A. Shchipskiy, P. N. Mukhin, Dmitriy M. Akinfiev, M. M. Kalimatova, Anara А. Agalarova","doi":"10.17816/kmj623187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. It has been established that there are no functional differences between the paired salivary glands, but the presence or absence of structural differences in the contralateral salivary glands remains unknown. Aim. To determine the presence of features of the contralateral salivary glands’ structural organization, which should be taken into account in the process of differential diagnosis in patients with various diseases of the salivary glands when analyzing sialograms. Material and methods. In 60 patients with diseases of the salivary glands, digital subtraction sialography of the parotid (right n=33, left n=26) and submandibular (right n=17, left n=19) glands was performed. The parameters of the paired glands were compared: the number and time of filling of the ducts with the water-soluble non-ionic contrast agent iodixanol. The sample was formed without taking into account gender, age and diseases. Cases with stones or ductal strictures were excluded. The significance of differences was assessed using Student's t-test. The results were considered significant at p ≤0.05. Results. The contrast time for the parotid glands (n=59) averaged 29.8±8.9 s: on the right — 31.0±8.0 s (n=33), on the left — 28.2±9.6 s (n= 26; t=1.2219); submandibular glands (n=36) — 28.6±11.6 s: on the right — 30.2±14.4 s (n=19), on the left — 27.3±8.3 s (n=17; t= 0.7284). The amount of drug injected into the ducts reflected their volume, which we considered as an accurate characteristic of their structural state. 1.4±0.3 ml of iodixanol (Visipack) was injected into the parotid glands (n=59): on the right — 1.4±0.3 ml (n=33), on the left — 1.4±0.3 ml (n =26; t=0). 1.2±0.3 ml was injected into the submandibular glands (n=35): on the right — 1.2±0.4 ml (n=17), on the left — 1.1±0.3 ml (n=18; t=0.8399). There was no significant difference between the contralateral glands, but there was a significant diffe¬rence between the parotid and submandibular glands (t=3.1247; p ≤0.001). When conducting scientific analysis, data from the contralateral salivary glands could be combined into a single sample. The amount of drug injected into the ducts served as a characteristic of the structural state of the gland. Conclusion. The contralateral salivary glands do not have significant structural differences, and structural changes in the same patient are of the same type.","PeriodicalId":17750,"journal":{"name":"Kazan medical journal","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural organization of the contralateral salivary glands\",\"authors\":\"A. Shchipskiy, P. N. Mukhin, Dmitriy M. Akinfiev, M. M. Kalimatova, Anara А. Agalarova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/kmj623187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. It has been established that there are no functional differences between the paired salivary glands, but the presence or absence of structural differences in the contralateral salivary glands remains unknown. Aim. To determine the presence of features of the contralateral salivary glands’ structural organization, which should be taken into account in the process of differential diagnosis in patients with various diseases of the salivary glands when analyzing sialograms. Material and methods. In 60 patients with diseases of the salivary glands, digital subtraction sialography of the parotid (right n=33, left n=26) and submandibular (right n=17, left n=19) glands was performed. The parameters of the paired glands were compared: the number and time of filling of the ducts with the water-soluble non-ionic contrast agent iodixanol. The sample was formed without taking into account gender, age and diseases. Cases with stones or ductal strictures were excluded. The significance of differences was assessed using Student's t-test. The results were considered significant at p ≤0.05. Results. The contrast time for the parotid glands (n=59) averaged 29.8±8.9 s: on the right — 31.0±8.0 s (n=33), on the left — 28.2±9.6 s (n= 26; t=1.2219); submandibular glands (n=36) — 28.6±11.6 s: on the right — 30.2±14.4 s (n=19), on the left — 27.3±8.3 s (n=17; t= 0.7284). The amount of drug injected into the ducts reflected their volume, which we considered as an accurate characteristic of their structural state. 1.4±0.3 ml of iodixanol (Visipack) was injected into the parotid glands (n=59): on the right — 1.4±0.3 ml (n=33), on the left — 1.4±0.3 ml (n =26; t=0). 1.2±0.3 ml was injected into the submandibular glands (n=35): on the right — 1.2±0.4 ml (n=17), on the left — 1.1±0.3 ml (n=18; t=0.8399). There was no significant difference between the contralateral glands, but there was a significant diffe¬rence between the parotid and submandibular glands (t=3.1247; p ≤0.001). When conducting scientific analysis, data from the contralateral salivary glands could be combined into a single sample. The amount of drug injected into the ducts served as a characteristic of the structural state of the gland. Conclusion. The contralateral salivary glands do not have significant structural differences, and structural changes in the same patient are of the same type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kazan medical journal\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kazan medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj623187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazan medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj623187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。已证实成对唾液腺之间没有功能差异,但对侧唾液腺是否存在结构差异仍是未知数。 研究目的确定对侧唾液腺结构组织是否存在特征,在分析唾液图时,应考虑到唾液腺各种疾病患者的鉴别诊断过程。 材料和方法对 60 名涎腺疾病患者进行了腮腺(右侧 33 人,左侧 26 人)和颌下腺(右侧 17 人,左侧 19 人)数字减影涎腺造影检查。比较了两对腺体的参数:水溶性非离子造影剂碘克沙醇填充腺管的数量和时间。样本的形成不考虑性别、年龄和疾病。患有结石或导管狭窄的病例被排除在外。差异的显著性采用学生 t 检验。P≤0.05为差异显著。 结果腮腺(n=59)的对比时间平均为(29.8±8.9)秒:右侧为(31.0±8.0)秒(n=33),左侧为(28.2±9.6)秒(n=26;t=1.2219);颌下腺(n=36)- 28.6±11.6 s:右侧- 30.2±14.4 s(n=19),左侧- 27.3±8.3 s(n=17;t= 0.7284)。注入导管的药量反映了导管的容积,我们认为这是导管结构状态的准确特征。向腮腺注入 1.4±0.3 毫升碘克沙醇(Visipack)(n=59):右侧 - 1.4±0.3 毫升(n=33),左侧 - 1.4±0.3 毫升(n=26;t=0)。颌下腺注射 1.2±0.3 毫升(35 人):右侧 - 1.2±0.4 毫升(17 人),左侧 - 1.1±0.3 毫升(18 人;t=0.8399)。对侧腺体之间无明显差异,但腮腺和颌下腺之间存在明显差异(t=3.1247;p≤0.001)。在进行科学分析时,对侧唾液腺的数据可合并为一个样本。注入腺管的药物量可作为腺体结构状态的特征。 结论对侧唾液腺在结构上没有明显差异,同一患者的结构变化属于同一类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural organization of the contralateral salivary glands
Background. It has been established that there are no functional differences between the paired salivary glands, but the presence or absence of structural differences in the contralateral salivary glands remains unknown. Aim. To determine the presence of features of the contralateral salivary glands’ structural organization, which should be taken into account in the process of differential diagnosis in patients with various diseases of the salivary glands when analyzing sialograms. Material and methods. In 60 patients with diseases of the salivary glands, digital subtraction sialography of the parotid (right n=33, left n=26) and submandibular (right n=17, left n=19) glands was performed. The parameters of the paired glands were compared: the number and time of filling of the ducts with the water-soluble non-ionic contrast agent iodixanol. The sample was formed without taking into account gender, age and diseases. Cases with stones or ductal strictures were excluded. The significance of differences was assessed using Student's t-test. The results were considered significant at p ≤0.05. Results. The contrast time for the parotid glands (n=59) averaged 29.8±8.9 s: on the right — 31.0±8.0 s (n=33), on the left — 28.2±9.6 s (n= 26; t=1.2219); submandibular glands (n=36) — 28.6±11.6 s: on the right — 30.2±14.4 s (n=19), on the left — 27.3±8.3 s (n=17; t= 0.7284). The amount of drug injected into the ducts reflected their volume, which we considered as an accurate characteristic of their structural state. 1.4±0.3 ml of iodixanol (Visipack) was injected into the parotid glands (n=59): on the right — 1.4±0.3 ml (n=33), on the left — 1.4±0.3 ml (n =26; t=0). 1.2±0.3 ml was injected into the submandibular glands (n=35): on the right — 1.2±0.4 ml (n=17), on the left — 1.1±0.3 ml (n=18; t=0.8399). There was no significant difference between the contralateral glands, but there was a significant diffe¬rence between the parotid and submandibular glands (t=3.1247; p ≤0.001). When conducting scientific analysis, data from the contralateral salivary glands could be combined into a single sample. The amount of drug injected into the ducts served as a characteristic of the structural state of the gland. Conclusion. The contralateral salivary glands do not have significant structural differences, and structural changes in the same patient are of the same type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信