棕榈叶灰和竹叶灰混合水泥混凝土的抗压强度特性

A. Olaniyi, Popoola Oyinade Christianah, Ewulo Lois Oluwadara
{"title":"棕榈叶灰和竹叶灰混合水泥混凝土的抗压强度特性","authors":"A. Olaniyi, Popoola Oyinade Christianah, Ewulo Lois Oluwadara","doi":"10.47191/etj/v8i11.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study determined the physical properties of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, the effect of curing age on compressive strength characteristics of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, and the effect of percentage replacement of cement with pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete on compressive strength. 100 ×100×100 mm cubes specimens were cast, and the concrete compressive strengths were determined at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of curing. The control sample, with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, exhibited the highest strength at 28 days but the lowest at 7 days. The sample with 5% BLA and PLA replacement showed an increase in strength at 14 days, a decrease at 21 days, and another increase at 28 days, with the highest strength observed at 14 days. On the other hand, the samples with 10%, 15%, and 20% BLA and PLA replacement demonstrated a consistent increase in strength, although a decrease in strength was observed at 28 days. The experiment revealed that the highest compressive strength was achieved at 28 days with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, while the lowest compressive strength was observed at 7 days with 20% BLA and PLA replacement. These findings indicate that the rate of strength development in BLA and PLA blended cement concrete is slower during the early curing period (7 days) but accelerates during later ages (14 days and 21 days), with a slight decrease at 28 days. In contrast, the control sample without BLA and PLA replacement exhibited slow strength development initially (7 days) but showed faster progress at later ages. Based on the test results, 20% replacement was found to be the optimum level for both compressive strength and workability of concrete with cement partially replaced with BLA and PLA.","PeriodicalId":507832,"journal":{"name":"Engineering and Technology Journal","volume":"164 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF PAWPAW LEAF ASH AND BAMBOO LEAF ASH BLENDED CEMENT CONCRETE\",\"authors\":\"A. Olaniyi, Popoola Oyinade Christianah, Ewulo Lois Oluwadara\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/etj/v8i11.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study determined the physical properties of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, the effect of curing age on compressive strength characteristics of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, and the effect of percentage replacement of cement with pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete on compressive strength. 100 ×100×100 mm cubes specimens were cast, and the concrete compressive strengths were determined at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of curing. The control sample, with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, exhibited the highest strength at 28 days but the lowest at 7 days. The sample with 5% BLA and PLA replacement showed an increase in strength at 14 days, a decrease at 21 days, and another increase at 28 days, with the highest strength observed at 14 days. On the other hand, the samples with 10%, 15%, and 20% BLA and PLA replacement demonstrated a consistent increase in strength, although a decrease in strength was observed at 28 days. The experiment revealed that the highest compressive strength was achieved at 28 days with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, while the lowest compressive strength was observed at 7 days with 20% BLA and PLA replacement. These findings indicate that the rate of strength development in BLA and PLA blended cement concrete is slower during the early curing period (7 days) but accelerates during later ages (14 days and 21 days), with a slight decrease at 28 days. In contrast, the control sample without BLA and PLA replacement exhibited slow strength development initially (7 days) but showed faster progress at later ages. Based on the test results, 20% replacement was found to be the optimum level for both compressive strength and workability of concrete with cement partially replaced with BLA and PLA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering and Technology Journal\",\"volume\":\"164 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering and Technology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v8i11.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering and Technology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v8i11.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究测定了桐叶灰和竹叶灰掺和水泥混凝土的物理性能、养护龄期对桐叶灰和竹叶灰掺和水泥混凝土抗压强度特性的影响,以及桐叶灰和竹叶灰掺和水泥混凝土水泥替代率对抗压强度的影响。浇注 100 × 100 × 100 毫米的立方体试样,测定养护 7、14、21 和 28 天时的混凝土抗压强度。BLA 和 PLA 含量为 0% 的对照样品在 28 天时强度最高,但在 7 天时强度最低。含 5% BLA 和聚乳酸替代物的样品在 14 天时强度增加,21 天时强度降低,28 天时强度再次增加,14 天时强度最高。另一方面,含 10%、15% 和 20% BLA 和聚乳酸替代物的样品在 28 天时强度有所下降,但强度持续上升。实验结果表明,BLA 和 PLA 含量为 0% 的样品在 28 天时的抗压强度最高,而 BLA 和 PLA 含量为 20% 的样品在 7 天时的抗压强度最低。这些结果表明,BLA 和 PLA 混合水泥混凝土的强度发展速度在早期养护期(7 天)较慢,但在后期龄期(14 天和 21 天)加快,在 28 天时略有下降。相比之下,未添加 BLA 和聚乳酸的对照样品在初期(7 天)强度发展较慢,但在后期龄期发展较快。测试结果表明,20% 的掺量是部分使用 BLA 和 PLA 替代水泥的混凝土抗压强度和工作性的最佳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF PAWPAW LEAF ASH AND BAMBOO LEAF ASH BLENDED CEMENT CONCRETE
The study determined the physical properties of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, the effect of curing age on compressive strength characteristics of pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete, and the effect of percentage replacement of cement with pawpaw leaf ash and bamboo leaf ash blended cement concrete on compressive strength. 100 ×100×100 mm cubes specimens were cast, and the concrete compressive strengths were determined at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of curing. The control sample, with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, exhibited the highest strength at 28 days but the lowest at 7 days. The sample with 5% BLA and PLA replacement showed an increase in strength at 14 days, a decrease at 21 days, and another increase at 28 days, with the highest strength observed at 14 days. On the other hand, the samples with 10%, 15%, and 20% BLA and PLA replacement demonstrated a consistent increase in strength, although a decrease in strength was observed at 28 days. The experiment revealed that the highest compressive strength was achieved at 28 days with 0% BLA and PLA replacement, while the lowest compressive strength was observed at 7 days with 20% BLA and PLA replacement. These findings indicate that the rate of strength development in BLA and PLA blended cement concrete is slower during the early curing period (7 days) but accelerates during later ages (14 days and 21 days), with a slight decrease at 28 days. In contrast, the control sample without BLA and PLA replacement exhibited slow strength development initially (7 days) but showed faster progress at later ages. Based on the test results, 20% replacement was found to be the optimum level for both compressive strength and workability of concrete with cement partially replaced with BLA and PLA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信