右美托咪定和布比卡因与单用布比卡因在股骨骨折超声引导下的筋膜髂室阻滞治疗中的比较

IF 0.4 4区 医学
{"title":"右美托咪定和布比卡因与单用布比卡因在股骨骨折超声引导下的筋膜髂室阻滞治疗中的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.32592/ircmj.2023.25.11.2040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain control is one of the most important issues in femoral fractures. One of the most effective methods is the fascia iliaca compartment block. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on the quality of ultrasound guided blockade of the fascia iliaca compartment in adults undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery. Methods: This study was a double-blind clinical trial. We studied 60 adults who were hospitalized for a femoral shaft fracture. The patients were divided into two equal groups receiving either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine for compartment blockade of the iliac fascia. Group allocation was based on the method of randomization from concealed envelopes. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, sedation and analgesic consumption assessed at 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery in two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Pain intensity was lower in the dexmedetomidine group 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The sedation score was also higher in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The dose of analgesics used by the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower 6 and 24 h after treatment. No hypotension, respiratory depressionand bradycardia occurred in the patients participating in this study. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine during ultrasound-guided blockade of the fascia-iliac compartment is associated with reduced pain intensity and improved sedation in patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery.","PeriodicalId":14628,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade for Femoral Fractures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.32592/ircmj.2023.25.11.2040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pain control is one of the most important issues in femoral fractures. One of the most effective methods is the fascia iliaca compartment block. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on the quality of ultrasound guided blockade of the fascia iliaca compartment in adults undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery. Methods: This study was a double-blind clinical trial. We studied 60 adults who were hospitalized for a femoral shaft fracture. The patients were divided into two equal groups receiving either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine for compartment blockade of the iliac fascia. Group allocation was based on the method of randomization from concealed envelopes. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, sedation and analgesic consumption assessed at 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery in two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Pain intensity was lower in the dexmedetomidine group 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The sedation score was also higher in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The dose of analgesics used by the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower 6 and 24 h after treatment. No hypotension, respiratory depressionand bradycardia occurred in the patients participating in this study. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine during ultrasound-guided blockade of the fascia-iliac compartment is associated with reduced pain intensity and improved sedation in patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32592/ircmj.2023.25.11.2040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/ircmj.2023.25.11.2040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛控制是股骨骨折最重要的问题之一。髂筋膜室阻滞是最有效的方法之一。 研究目的本研究旨在比较在布比卡因中加入右美托咪定对接受股骨干骨折手术的成人髂筋膜室超声引导阻滞质量的影响。 研究方法本研究是一项双盲临床试验。我们对 60 名因股骨柄骨折住院的成人进行了研究。患者被分为两组,分别接受布比卡因单独或布比卡因和右美托咪定进行髂筋膜室阻滞。组别分配采用暗信封随机法。两组患者术后1、2、6和24小时的疼痛强度、镇静和镇痛药消耗量为主要评估结果。数据使用 SPSS 软件进行分析。 结果右美托咪定组术后 1、2、6 和 24 小时的疼痛强度较低(P<0.05)。右美托咪定组术后 6 小时和 24 小时的镇静评分也更高(P<0.05)。右美托咪定组术后 6 小时和 24 小时的镇痛剂用量明显较低。参与本研究的患者未出现低血压、呼吸抑制和心动过缓。 结论在超声引导下阻滞筋膜-髂骨室时,在布比卡因中加入右美托咪定可降低股骨骨折手术患者的疼痛强度并改善镇静效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade for Femoral Fractures
Background: Pain control is one of the most important issues in femoral fractures. One of the most effective methods is the fascia iliaca compartment block. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on the quality of ultrasound guided blockade of the fascia iliaca compartment in adults undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery. Methods: This study was a double-blind clinical trial. We studied 60 adults who were hospitalized for a femoral shaft fracture. The patients were divided into two equal groups receiving either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine for compartment blockade of the iliac fascia. Group allocation was based on the method of randomization from concealed envelopes. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, sedation and analgesic consumption assessed at 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery in two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Pain intensity was lower in the dexmedetomidine group 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The sedation score was also higher in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 24 hours after surgery (p<0.05). The dose of analgesics used by the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower 6 and 24 h after treatment. No hypotension, respiratory depressionand bradycardia occurred in the patients participating in this study. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine during ultrasound-guided blockade of the fascia-iliac compartment is associated with reduced pain intensity and improved sedation in patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with general Medicine and Surgery, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the Iranian Hospital Dubai and is published monthly. The Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信