向循环经济过渡:循环型商业模式的矛盾张力

IF 4.2 4区 管理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
L. Dagilienė, Viktorija Varaniūtė
{"title":"向循环经济过渡:循环型商业模式的矛盾张力","authors":"L. Dagilienė, Viktorija Varaniūtė","doi":"10.1177/10860266231213108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The circular economy is seen as a way to replace the dominant linear business models, which are based solely on increasing economic value. However, organisations transitioning to a circular business model usually face multiple tensions arising from the paradoxical relationship between achieving circularity and creating economic value. Therefore, we combine the literature on circular business models and paradox theory to systematise knowledge on paradoxical tensions that occur while transitioning to circular business model. Following an abductive approach, the research methodology employs semi-structured interviews and observation in the cross-sectorial manufacturing context. The research results allow us to identify novel insights into organisational-level tensions, namely, goal setting, performance orientation, compliance, in-network collaboration, and innovation adoption. In addition, we define the concept of a strategic paradox in the circular economy, which acknowledges the tension between true circular products and products as usual.","PeriodicalId":47984,"journal":{"name":"Organization & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning to a Circular Economy: Paradoxical Tensions of the Circular Business Model\",\"authors\":\"L. Dagilienė, Viktorija Varaniūtė\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10860266231213108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The circular economy is seen as a way to replace the dominant linear business models, which are based solely on increasing economic value. However, organisations transitioning to a circular business model usually face multiple tensions arising from the paradoxical relationship between achieving circularity and creating economic value. Therefore, we combine the literature on circular business models and paradox theory to systematise knowledge on paradoxical tensions that occur while transitioning to circular business model. Following an abductive approach, the research methodology employs semi-structured interviews and observation in the cross-sectorial manufacturing context. The research results allow us to identify novel insights into organisational-level tensions, namely, goal setting, performance orientation, compliance, in-network collaboration, and innovation adoption. In addition, we define the concept of a strategic paradox in the circular economy, which acknowledges the tension between true circular products and products as usual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization & Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231213108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231213108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环经济被认为是取代以增加经济价值为唯一基础的主流线性商业模式的一种方式。然而,正在向循环型商业模式转型的组织通常面临着多种矛盾,这些矛盾来自于实现循环性与创造经济价值之间的悖论关系。因此,我们结合有关循环型商业模式的文献和悖论理论,对过渡到循环型商业模式过程中出现的悖论性紧张关系进行系统化研究。研究方法采用归纳法,在跨行业制造业背景下进行半结构式访谈和观察。研究结果使我们对组织层面的紧张关系,即目标设定、绩效导向、合规性、网络内协作和创新采用,有了新的认识。此外,我们还定义了循环经济中的战略悖论概念,即真正的循环产品与常规产品之间的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning to a Circular Economy: Paradoxical Tensions of the Circular Business Model
The circular economy is seen as a way to replace the dominant linear business models, which are based solely on increasing economic value. However, organisations transitioning to a circular business model usually face multiple tensions arising from the paradoxical relationship between achieving circularity and creating economic value. Therefore, we combine the literature on circular business models and paradox theory to systematise knowledge on paradoxical tensions that occur while transitioning to circular business model. Following an abductive approach, the research methodology employs semi-structured interviews and observation in the cross-sectorial manufacturing context. The research results allow us to identify novel insights into organisational-level tensions, namely, goal setting, performance orientation, compliance, in-network collaboration, and innovation adoption. In addition, we define the concept of a strategic paradox in the circular economy, which acknowledges the tension between true circular products and products as usual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Organization & Environment encourages informed discussion about the social roots and consequences of environmental problems and stimulates deeper reflection on the meaning and significance of the natural world. By critically examining the impact of human production and consumption systems on the natural environment, Organization & Environment develops new perspectives on organizations that encourage environmentally sensitive reflection, inquiry, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信