冠状动脉钙对冠状动脉疾病中危人群的预后价值

K. Kagita, Madhuri Posina
{"title":"冠状动脉钙对冠状动脉疾病中危人群的预后价值","authors":"K. Kagita, Madhuri Posina","doi":"10.54136/erwej-0304-10063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The present study was designed to estimate the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and its association with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic patients who are at risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Objective: To estimate the CACS and its association with the incidence of MACE in asymptomatic patients. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional observational study, 108 consecutive patients were enrolled. Demographic details and clinical data including lipid profile, systolic blood pressure, electrocardiography, 2D echocardiography, and routine blood investigations were reported. CACS was derived from computed tomography using a 256-slice scanner with a rotation time of 270 milliseconds. MACE was recorded at a one-year follow-up. Results: The mean age was 54.55 ± 7.7 years with male predominance (62%). CACS categories 0, 1-99, 10-399, 400-999, and more than 1000 constituted 43.5%, 28.7%, 18.52%, 8.33%, and 0.93% respectively. The correlation between the groups of positive and negative CACS and the presence or absence of standard risk factors was found to be statistically significant in diabetes mellitus (P=<0.001), hypertension (P=<0.001), and history of CAD in the family (P = 0.036). Although the association between smokers and calcium was statistically insignificant, it had clinical significance (P= 0.294). Out of 108 patients, MACE was observed in 16 (14.81%) patients with positive CACS at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion:CACS measurement is often regarded as the primary non-invasive approach for risk stratification, MACE estimation, and promptly identifying high-risk asymptomatic individuals. Keywords: Coronary Artery Calcium Score; Cardiovascular Events; Coronary Calcification; Risk Stratificationa","PeriodicalId":312076,"journal":{"name":"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal","volume":"303 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the Intermediate-Risk Population of Developing Coronary Artery Disease\",\"authors\":\"K. Kagita, Madhuri Posina\",\"doi\":\"10.54136/erwej-0304-10063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The present study was designed to estimate the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and its association with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic patients who are at risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Objective: To estimate the CACS and its association with the incidence of MACE in asymptomatic patients. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional observational study, 108 consecutive patients were enrolled. Demographic details and clinical data including lipid profile, systolic blood pressure, electrocardiography, 2D echocardiography, and routine blood investigations were reported. CACS was derived from computed tomography using a 256-slice scanner with a rotation time of 270 milliseconds. MACE was recorded at a one-year follow-up. Results: The mean age was 54.55 ± 7.7 years with male predominance (62%). CACS categories 0, 1-99, 10-399, 400-999, and more than 1000 constituted 43.5%, 28.7%, 18.52%, 8.33%, and 0.93% respectively. The correlation between the groups of positive and negative CACS and the presence or absence of standard risk factors was found to be statistically significant in diabetes mellitus (P=<0.001), hypertension (P=<0.001), and history of CAD in the family (P = 0.036). Although the association between smokers and calcium was statistically insignificant, it had clinical significance (P= 0.294). Out of 108 patients, MACE was observed in 16 (14.81%) patients with positive CACS at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion:CACS measurement is often regarded as the primary non-invasive approach for risk stratification, MACE estimation, and promptly identifying high-risk asymptomatic individuals. Keywords: Coronary Artery Calcium Score; Cardiovascular Events; Coronary Calcification; Risk Stratificationa\",\"PeriodicalId\":312076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal\",\"volume\":\"303 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54136/erwej-0304-10063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54136/erwej-0304-10063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在估算冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)及其与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)高危无症状患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率的关系。目的估计无症状患者的 CACS 及其与 MACE 发生率的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性横断面观察研究中,对无症状患者的 CACS 进行评估:在这项前瞻性横断面观察研究中,共招募了 108 名连续患者。报告了详细的人口统计学资料和临床数据,包括血脂概况、收缩压、心电图、二维超声心动图和常规血液检查。CACS 由计算机断层扫描得出,使用的是旋转时间为 270 毫秒的 256 片扫描仪。对随访一年的 MACE 进行了记录。结果平均年龄为(54.55 ± 7.7)岁,男性占多数(62%)。CACS分类为0、1-99、10-399、400-999和超过1000的患者分别占43.5%、28.7%、18.52%、8.33%和0.93%。研究发现,在糖尿病(P=<0.001)、高血压(P=<0.001)和家族有 CAD 病史(P=0.036)的人群中,CACS 阳性和阴性组与是否存在标准危险因素之间的相关性具有统计学意义。虽然吸烟者与钙之间的关系在统计学上并不显著,但却具有临床意义(P= 0.294)。在108名患者中,有16名(14.81%)患者的CACS呈阳性,在1年的随访中观察到了MACE。结论:CACS测量通常被认为是进行风险分层、MACE估计和及时发现无症状高危人群的主要无创方法。关键词冠状动脉钙化评分;心血管事件;冠状动脉钙化;风险分层a
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the Intermediate-Risk Population of Developing Coronary Artery Disease
Background: The present study was designed to estimate the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and its association with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic patients who are at risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Objective: To estimate the CACS and its association with the incidence of MACE in asymptomatic patients. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional observational study, 108 consecutive patients were enrolled. Demographic details and clinical data including lipid profile, systolic blood pressure, electrocardiography, 2D echocardiography, and routine blood investigations were reported. CACS was derived from computed tomography using a 256-slice scanner with a rotation time of 270 milliseconds. MACE was recorded at a one-year follow-up. Results: The mean age was 54.55 ± 7.7 years with male predominance (62%). CACS categories 0, 1-99, 10-399, 400-999, and more than 1000 constituted 43.5%, 28.7%, 18.52%, 8.33%, and 0.93% respectively. The correlation between the groups of positive and negative CACS and the presence or absence of standard risk factors was found to be statistically significant in diabetes mellitus (P=<0.001), hypertension (P=<0.001), and history of CAD in the family (P = 0.036). Although the association between smokers and calcium was statistically insignificant, it had clinical significance (P= 0.294). Out of 108 patients, MACE was observed in 16 (14.81%) patients with positive CACS at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion:CACS measurement is often regarded as the primary non-invasive approach for risk stratification, MACE estimation, and promptly identifying high-risk asymptomatic individuals. Keywords: Coronary Artery Calcium Score; Cardiovascular Events; Coronary Calcification; Risk Stratificationa
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信