Ilona Croy, Carina Heller, G. Akello, Afifa Anjum, C. Atama, A. Avsec, Boris Bizumic, Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, M. Boussena, Marina Butovskaya, Seda Can, H. Çetinkaya, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Rui Costa Lopes, Marcin Czub, Slávka Démuthová, D. Dronova, Seda Dural, O. Eya, Mokadem Fatma, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Farida Guemaz, Ivana Hromatko, K. Kafetsios, Tina Kavčič, I. Khilji, Magdalena Kruk, Cătălin Lazăr, T. Lindholm, A. Londero-Santos, Conal Monaghan, Anam Shahid, Bojan Musil, J. Natividade, E. Oberzaucher, A. Oleszkiewicz, Ike E. Onyishi, C. Onyishi, A. Pagani, M. Parise, K. Pisanski, Nejc Plohl, Camelia Popa, P. Prokop, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz, R. Sargautytė, Shivantika Sharad, J. Valentova, M. Varella, Belkacem Yakhlef, Gyesook Yoo, Gaja Zager Kocjan, M. Zupančič, A. Sorokowska
{"title":"COVID-19 与社会距离:大流行之前和期间人际距离偏好和接触行为的跨文化研究","authors":"Ilona Croy, Carina Heller, G. Akello, Afifa Anjum, C. Atama, A. Avsec, Boris Bizumic, Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, M. Boussena, Marina Butovskaya, Seda Can, H. Çetinkaya, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Rui Costa Lopes, Marcin Czub, Slávka Démuthová, D. Dronova, Seda Dural, O. Eya, Mokadem Fatma, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Farida Guemaz, Ivana Hromatko, K. Kafetsios, Tina Kavčič, I. Khilji, Magdalena Kruk, Cătălin Lazăr, T. Lindholm, A. Londero-Santos, Conal Monaghan, Anam Shahid, Bojan Musil, J. Natividade, E. Oberzaucher, A. Oleszkiewicz, Ike E. Onyishi, C. Onyishi, A. Pagani, M. Parise, K. Pisanski, Nejc Plohl, Camelia Popa, P. Prokop, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz, R. Sargautytė, Shivantika Sharad, J. Valentova, M. Varella, Belkacem Yakhlef, Gyesook Yoo, Gaja Zager Kocjan, M. Zupančič, A. Sorokowska","doi":"10.1177/10693971231174935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the introduction of unprecedented safety measures, one of them being physical distancing recommendations. Here, we assessed whether the pandemic has led to long-term effects on two important physical distancing aspects, namely interpersonal distance preferences and interpersonal touch behaviors. We analyzed nearly 14,000 individual cases from two large, cross-cultural surveys – the first conducted 2 years prior to the pandemic and the second during a relatively stable period of a decreased infection rate in May-June 2021. Preferred interpersonal distances increased by 54% globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was observable across all types of relationships, all countries, and was more pronounced in individuals with higher self-reported vulnerability to diseases. Unexpectedly, participants reported a higher incidence of interpersonal touch behaviors during than before the pandemic. We discuss our results in the context of prosocial and self-protection motivations that potentially promote different social behaviors.","PeriodicalId":47154,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Research","volume":"137 1","pages":"41 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and Social Distancing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Interpersonal Distance Preferences and Touch Behaviors Before and During the Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Ilona Croy, Carina Heller, G. Akello, Afifa Anjum, C. Atama, A. Avsec, Boris Bizumic, Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, M. Boussena, Marina Butovskaya, Seda Can, H. Çetinkaya, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Rui Costa Lopes, Marcin Czub, Slávka Démuthová, D. Dronova, Seda Dural, O. Eya, Mokadem Fatma, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Farida Guemaz, Ivana Hromatko, K. Kafetsios, Tina Kavčič, I. Khilji, Magdalena Kruk, Cătălin Lazăr, T. Lindholm, A. Londero-Santos, Conal Monaghan, Anam Shahid, Bojan Musil, J. Natividade, E. Oberzaucher, A. Oleszkiewicz, Ike E. Onyishi, C. Onyishi, A. Pagani, M. Parise, K. Pisanski, Nejc Plohl, Camelia Popa, P. Prokop, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz, R. Sargautytė, Shivantika Sharad, J. Valentova, M. Varella, Belkacem Yakhlef, Gyesook Yoo, Gaja Zager Kocjan, M. Zupančič, A. Sorokowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10693971231174935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the introduction of unprecedented safety measures, one of them being physical distancing recommendations. Here, we assessed whether the pandemic has led to long-term effects on two important physical distancing aspects, namely interpersonal distance preferences and interpersonal touch behaviors. We analyzed nearly 14,000 individual cases from two large, cross-cultural surveys – the first conducted 2 years prior to the pandemic and the second during a relatively stable period of a decreased infection rate in May-June 2021. Preferred interpersonal distances increased by 54% globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was observable across all types of relationships, all countries, and was more pronounced in individuals with higher self-reported vulnerability to diseases. Unexpectedly, participants reported a higher incidence of interpersonal touch behaviors during than before the pandemic. We discuss our results in the context of prosocial and self-protection motivations that potentially promote different social behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cross-Cultural Research\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cross-Cultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971231174935\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971231174935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
COVID-19 and Social Distancing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Interpersonal Distance Preferences and Touch Behaviors Before and During the Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the introduction of unprecedented safety measures, one of them being physical distancing recommendations. Here, we assessed whether the pandemic has led to long-term effects on two important physical distancing aspects, namely interpersonal distance preferences and interpersonal touch behaviors. We analyzed nearly 14,000 individual cases from two large, cross-cultural surveys – the first conducted 2 years prior to the pandemic and the second during a relatively stable period of a decreased infection rate in May-June 2021. Preferred interpersonal distances increased by 54% globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was observable across all types of relationships, all countries, and was more pronounced in individuals with higher self-reported vulnerability to diseases. Unexpectedly, participants reported a higher incidence of interpersonal touch behaviors during than before the pandemic. We discuss our results in the context of prosocial and self-protection motivations that potentially promote different social behaviors.
期刊介绍:
Cross-Cultural Research, formerly Behavior Science Research, is sponsored by the Human Relations Area Files, Inc. (HRAF) and is the official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research. The mission of the journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles describing cross-cultural or comparative studies in all the social/behavioral sciences and other sciences dealing with humans, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, economics, human ecology, and evolutionary biology. Worldwide cross-cultural studies are particularly welcomed, but all kinds of systematic comparisons are acceptable so long as they deal explicity with cross-cultural issues pertaining to the constraints and variables of human behavior.