{"title":"评估农村地区人口管理服务质量","authors":"Muwaffiq Lailatul Aini, Lailul Mursyidah","doi":"10.21070/ijppr.v1i0.1317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study investigated the quality of administrative services in Desa Popoh, Wonoayu District, Sidoarjo Regency, Indonesia, addressing prevalent issues such as slow service delivery, uncertainty in completion timelines, unfamiliarity with procedural mechanisms, and perceived inadequacies in employee attitudes. Employing descriptive qualitative research methods, data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving a service head and two service users. Findings revealed a relatively favorable assessment across indicators: Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles, suggesting a reasonably good quality of service provision in the studied rural community. This study contributes insights into the factors influencing and hindering public service delivery, indicating a need for sustained efforts to enhance service efficiency and user satisfaction in similar settings. Highlights: Service Quality Evaluation: Investigated multiple indicators—Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles—to assess the quality of administrative services. Rural Service Provision: Explored challenges in service delivery, including slow response times, procedural uncertainties, and staff attitudes, within a rural Indonesian community. Enhancement Opportunities: Identified scope for improving service efficiency and user satisfaction, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts in similar rural settings. Keywords: Public Service Quality, Rural Communities, Administrative Services, Indonesia, Service Delivery","PeriodicalId":432952,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review","volume":"43 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Population Administration Service Quality in Rural Settings\",\"authors\":\"Muwaffiq Lailatul Aini, Lailul Mursyidah\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/ijppr.v1i0.1317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This qualitative study investigated the quality of administrative services in Desa Popoh, Wonoayu District, Sidoarjo Regency, Indonesia, addressing prevalent issues such as slow service delivery, uncertainty in completion timelines, unfamiliarity with procedural mechanisms, and perceived inadequacies in employee attitudes. Employing descriptive qualitative research methods, data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving a service head and two service users. Findings revealed a relatively favorable assessment across indicators: Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles, suggesting a reasonably good quality of service provision in the studied rural community. This study contributes insights into the factors influencing and hindering public service delivery, indicating a need for sustained efforts to enhance service efficiency and user satisfaction in similar settings. Highlights: Service Quality Evaluation: Investigated multiple indicators—Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles—to assess the quality of administrative services. Rural Service Provision: Explored challenges in service delivery, including slow response times, procedural uncertainties, and staff attitudes, within a rural Indonesian community. Enhancement Opportunities: Identified scope for improving service efficiency and user satisfaction, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts in similar rural settings. Keywords: Public Service Quality, Rural Communities, Administrative Services, Indonesia, Service Delivery\",\"PeriodicalId\":432952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"43 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v1i0.1317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v1i0.1317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本定性研究调查了印度尼西亚锡多阿若行政区沃诺阿尤县 Desa Popoh 的行政服务质量,探讨了普遍存在的问题,如服务提供缓慢、完成时限不确定、不熟悉程序机制以及员工态度不端正等。研究采用描述性定性研究方法,通过访谈、观察和文件记录收集数据,涉及一名服务负责人和两名服务使用者。研究结果显示,各项指标的评估结果相对较好:可靠度、响应度、保证度、同理心和切身感受等指标的评价相对较好,表明所研究的农村社区的服务质量相当不错。这项研究有助于深入了解影响和阻碍公共服务提供的因素,表明有必要在类似环境中持续努力提高服务效率和用户满意度。 亮点: 服务质量评估:调查了多个指标--可靠性、响应性、保证性、同理心和切身感受,以评估行政服务的质量。 农村服务提供:探讨印度尼西亚农村社区在提供服务方面面临的挑战,包括响应时间缓慢、程序不确定以及工作人员的态度。 改进机会:确定了提高服务效率和用户满意度的范围,强调了在类似农村环境中持续努力的必要性。 关键词公共服务质量、农村社区、行政服务、印度尼西亚、服务提供
Assessing Population Administration Service Quality in Rural Settings
This qualitative study investigated the quality of administrative services in Desa Popoh, Wonoayu District, Sidoarjo Regency, Indonesia, addressing prevalent issues such as slow service delivery, uncertainty in completion timelines, unfamiliarity with procedural mechanisms, and perceived inadequacies in employee attitudes. Employing descriptive qualitative research methods, data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving a service head and two service users. Findings revealed a relatively favorable assessment across indicators: Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles, suggesting a reasonably good quality of service provision in the studied rural community. This study contributes insights into the factors influencing and hindering public service delivery, indicating a need for sustained efforts to enhance service efficiency and user satisfaction in similar settings. Highlights: Service Quality Evaluation: Investigated multiple indicators—Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, and Tangibles—to assess the quality of administrative services. Rural Service Provision: Explored challenges in service delivery, including slow response times, procedural uncertainties, and staff attitudes, within a rural Indonesian community. Enhancement Opportunities: Identified scope for improving service efficiency and user satisfaction, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts in similar rural settings. Keywords: Public Service Quality, Rural Communities, Administrative Services, Indonesia, Service Delivery