{"title":"揭示分析前因素和分析因素对生物证据质量的影响:全面系统综述","authors":"Suneel Prajapati, Aditi Mishra, Megha Sapkota, Mukul Meshram, Mahima Sharma, Arun Kumar","doi":"10.2174/0126664844265714231013112504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ensuring the quality of biological evidence is key and has become a routine requirement in forensic laboratories. The quality of biological evidence is determined by the pre-analytical and analytical phase that encompasses all procedures, starting with the crime scene to laboratory investigation of biological evidence. This is the most vulnerable part of the total testing process and a major component of the reliability and validity of results. Therefore, to generate a quality report, every biological evidence resource should be collected, maintained, and disseminated to the highest quality, based on the intended forensic use. Method: Pre-analyt-ical errors can happen at any stage prior to the testing process due to the use of insufficient or improper order of evidence collection, packaging, labelling, prolonged environmental exposure, failure to find the proper storage, the collection of evidence that is unsuitable for quality or quan-tity, inappropriate mixing of a sample, etc. Such circumstances during transportation, prepara-tion, and storage can change the outcome of forensic evidence. While analytical errors may arise in the laboratory during the processing of evidence due to mishandling, cross-contamination, and a lack of standardised procedures. Thus, employing advanced analytical methodologies, strict quality control measures, ad-herence to ethical guidelines, and appropriate data interpretation during PCR, STR profiling, and DNA sequencing are of utmost importance. The validation of quality assurance in forensic biol-ogy has been guided by a \"fit-for-purpose\" approach, emphasizing the suitability of methods and procedures for forensic requirements and intended applications. Pre-analytical and analytical fac-tors play a critical role in determining the success of DNA analysis and its admissibility in a court of law. To address this, this review aimed at summarizing recommendations about the pre-analytical and analytical phases and provides some guidance to reduce the effects of such factors that can have a significant impact on biological evidence.","PeriodicalId":299746,"journal":{"name":"Current Forensic Science","volume":"466 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling the Impact of Pre-analytical and Analytical Factors on the Quality of Biological Evidence: A Comprehensive Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Suneel Prajapati, Aditi Mishra, Megha Sapkota, Mukul Meshram, Mahima Sharma, Arun Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126664844265714231013112504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ensuring the quality of biological evidence is key and has become a routine requirement in forensic laboratories. The quality of biological evidence is determined by the pre-analytical and analytical phase that encompasses all procedures, starting with the crime scene to laboratory investigation of biological evidence. This is the most vulnerable part of the total testing process and a major component of the reliability and validity of results. Therefore, to generate a quality report, every biological evidence resource should be collected, maintained, and disseminated to the highest quality, based on the intended forensic use. Method: Pre-analyt-ical errors can happen at any stage prior to the testing process due to the use of insufficient or improper order of evidence collection, packaging, labelling, prolonged environmental exposure, failure to find the proper storage, the collection of evidence that is unsuitable for quality or quan-tity, inappropriate mixing of a sample, etc. Such circumstances during transportation, prepara-tion, and storage can change the outcome of forensic evidence. While analytical errors may arise in the laboratory during the processing of evidence due to mishandling, cross-contamination, and a lack of standardised procedures. Thus, employing advanced analytical methodologies, strict quality control measures, ad-herence to ethical guidelines, and appropriate data interpretation during PCR, STR profiling, and DNA sequencing are of utmost importance. The validation of quality assurance in forensic biol-ogy has been guided by a \\\"fit-for-purpose\\\" approach, emphasizing the suitability of methods and procedures for forensic requirements and intended applications. Pre-analytical and analytical fac-tors play a critical role in determining the success of DNA analysis and its admissibility in a court of law. To address this, this review aimed at summarizing recommendations about the pre-analytical and analytical phases and provides some guidance to reduce the effects of such factors that can have a significant impact on biological evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Forensic Science\",\"volume\":\"466 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Forensic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126664844265714231013112504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Forensic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126664844265714231013112504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
确保生物证据的质量至关重要,这已成为法医实验室的例行要求。生物证据的质量取决于分析前和分析阶段,包括从犯罪现场到生物证据实验室调查的所有程序。这是整个检测过程中最脆弱的部分,也是检测结果可靠性和有效性的主要组成部分。因此,为生成高质量的报告,应根据预期的法医用途,以最高质量收集、维护和传播每一份生物证据资源。方法:分析前的错误可能发生在检测过程前的任何阶段,原因包括使用证据收集、包装、标签的顺序不充分或不恰当,长时间暴露在环境中,没有找到合适的储存方式,收集的证据质量或数量不合适,样本混合不当等。在运输、制备和储存过程中出现的这些情况可能会改变法医证据的结果。而实验室在处理证据时,由于处理不当、交叉污染和缺乏标准化程序,可能会出现分析错误。 因此,在 PCR、STR 图谱分析和 DNA 测序过程中,采用先进的分析方法、严格的质量控制措施、遵守道德准则和适当的数据解读至关重要。法医生物学质量保证的验证以 "适合目的 "方法为指导,强调方法和程序适合法医要求和预期应用。分析前和分析因素在决定 DNA 分析的成功与否及其在法庭上的可采性方面起着至关重要的作用。 为此,本综述旨在总结有关分析前和分析阶段的建议,并提供一些指导,以减少这些可能对生物证据产生重大影响的因素的影响。
Unraveling the Impact of Pre-analytical and Analytical Factors on the Quality of Biological Evidence: A Comprehensive Systematic Review
Ensuring the quality of biological evidence is key and has become a routine requirement in forensic laboratories. The quality of biological evidence is determined by the pre-analytical and analytical phase that encompasses all procedures, starting with the crime scene to laboratory investigation of biological evidence. This is the most vulnerable part of the total testing process and a major component of the reliability and validity of results. Therefore, to generate a quality report, every biological evidence resource should be collected, maintained, and disseminated to the highest quality, based on the intended forensic use. Method: Pre-analyt-ical errors can happen at any stage prior to the testing process due to the use of insufficient or improper order of evidence collection, packaging, labelling, prolonged environmental exposure, failure to find the proper storage, the collection of evidence that is unsuitable for quality or quan-tity, inappropriate mixing of a sample, etc. Such circumstances during transportation, prepara-tion, and storage can change the outcome of forensic evidence. While analytical errors may arise in the laboratory during the processing of evidence due to mishandling, cross-contamination, and a lack of standardised procedures. Thus, employing advanced analytical methodologies, strict quality control measures, ad-herence to ethical guidelines, and appropriate data interpretation during PCR, STR profiling, and DNA sequencing are of utmost importance. The validation of quality assurance in forensic biol-ogy has been guided by a "fit-for-purpose" approach, emphasizing the suitability of methods and procedures for forensic requirements and intended applications. Pre-analytical and analytical fac-tors play a critical role in determining the success of DNA analysis and its admissibility in a court of law. To address this, this review aimed at summarizing recommendations about the pre-analytical and analytical phases and provides some guidance to reduce the effects of such factors that can have a significant impact on biological evidence.