{"title":"没有杜波依斯,何来黑人激进康德主义?论方法、原则和废除民主","authors":"Elvira Basevich","doi":"10.1111/josp.12552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"55 1","pages":"6-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is a black radical Kantianism without Du Bois? On method, principle, and abolition democracy\",\"authors\":\"Elvira Basevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josp.12552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":46756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"6-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josp.12552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josp.12552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
:本文认为,黑人激进康德主义提出了在不公正情况下的康德正义理论。首先,我描述了黑人激进康德主义的政治批判方法,并解释了它如何建立在康德的共和主义之上。其次,我论证了康德关于公共权利的原始论述是不完整的,因为它忽视了公民对理想的采纳有助于完善这一理想。最后,借助杜波依斯(W.E.B. Du Bois)对美国重建的分析以及他提出的 "废奴民主",我为政治批判提供了经过完善的可普遍化的标准。杜波依斯重新定义了正义的要求,以保护黑人自由人和贫困劳动者的政治自由和生产能力。虽然起源于重建时期黑人自由人的政治诉求,但对政治自由和生产权力的普遍保护为政治判断提供了一个新颖的公共标准,这一标准在今天仍应作为讨论的基础。