语言是解放之源,语言是控制之源

Jonathan Luxmoore
{"title":"语言是解放之源,语言是控制之源","authors":"Jonathan Luxmoore","doi":"10.54515/lcp.2023.1.15-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We think and act through language. It determines how we exchange ideas, express emotions and see the world. And as such, language has always been a motor for enlightenment and progress, but also a means of control. It expresses our identity, and that identity takes multiple forms, affecting and shaping our values and priorities, how we view the world and those around us. They also determine the language we use - and this, not surprisingly, often becomes a source of political, social, cultural and ideological struggle. It also explains why, over the course of history, the wielders of power have sought to restrict or alter the use of language - by controlling education, culture, social customs, awareness of history and perceptions of identity. Poles have their own experience of this from the time of the Partitions, when imperial rulers attempted to curb transmission of the Polish language. Yet the efforts are being witnessed today, notably in Russia's portrayal of events in Ukraine. Are there grounds for thinking struggles over language have become more extreme today, in the face of new ideological and social pressures, as powerful and well-resourced lobbies and interest-groups manipulate the confusion and self-doubt of the majority to advance their own agendas? If so, we should remind ourselves that the spread of permissive, self-willed Western mindsets is very far from universal. Indeed, such mindsets are widely contested; and while social media and mass culture have been used as vehicles for promoting radical change, they are also being used increasingly as channels for a more integral, conservative vision of the world and humanity. We need to think and speak with critical precision, with a healthy empirical scepticism - and reject the lazy reliance on epithets, categorisations, stereotypes and simplifications which the new ideological orthodoxies so often rely upon.","PeriodicalId":285421,"journal":{"name":"Language Culture Politics International Journal","volume":"46 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language as a Source of Liberation, and Language as a Source of Control\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Luxmoore\",\"doi\":\"10.54515/lcp.2023.1.15-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We think and act through language. It determines how we exchange ideas, express emotions and see the world. And as such, language has always been a motor for enlightenment and progress, but also a means of control. It expresses our identity, and that identity takes multiple forms, affecting and shaping our values and priorities, how we view the world and those around us. They also determine the language we use - and this, not surprisingly, often becomes a source of political, social, cultural and ideological struggle. It also explains why, over the course of history, the wielders of power have sought to restrict or alter the use of language - by controlling education, culture, social customs, awareness of history and perceptions of identity. Poles have their own experience of this from the time of the Partitions, when imperial rulers attempted to curb transmission of the Polish language. Yet the efforts are being witnessed today, notably in Russia's portrayal of events in Ukraine. Are there grounds for thinking struggles over language have become more extreme today, in the face of new ideological and social pressures, as powerful and well-resourced lobbies and interest-groups manipulate the confusion and self-doubt of the majority to advance their own agendas? If so, we should remind ourselves that the spread of permissive, self-willed Western mindsets is very far from universal. Indeed, such mindsets are widely contested; and while social media and mass culture have been used as vehicles for promoting radical change, they are also being used increasingly as channels for a more integral, conservative vision of the world and humanity. We need to think and speak with critical precision, with a healthy empirical scepticism - and reject the lazy reliance on epithets, categorisations, stereotypes and simplifications which the new ideological orthodoxies so often rely upon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Culture Politics International Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Culture Politics International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2023.1.15-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Culture Politics International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2023.1.15-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过语言思考和行动。它决定了我们交流思想、表达情感和看待世界的方式。因此,语言一直是启蒙和进步的动力,但也是控制的手段。它表达了我们的身份,而这种身份有多种形式,影响并塑造着我们的价值观和优先事项,以及我们如何看待世界和周围的人。它们还决定了我们所使用的语言--而这往往成为政治、社会、文化和意识形态斗争的根源,这也不足为奇。 这也解释了为什么在历史长河中,掌权者试图通过控制教育、文化、社会习俗、历史意识和身份观念来限制或改变语言的使用。波兰人在分治时期就有过这样的经历,当时帝国统治者试图遏制波兰语的传播。然而,这种努力今天仍在继续,尤其是俄罗斯对乌克兰事件的描述。 面对新的意识形态和社会压力,强大且资源充足的游说团体和利益集团利用大多数人的困惑和自我怀疑来推进自己的议程,是否有理由认为语言斗争在今天变得更加极端? 如果是这样的话,我们应该提醒自己,放任自流、自以为是的西方思维方式的蔓延远非普遍现象。事实上,这种思维方式受到了广泛的质疑;尽管社交媒体和大众文化被用作推动激进变革的工具,但它们也越来越多地被用作对世界和人类持更加完整、保守看法的渠道。我们需要用批判的眼光、健康的经验怀疑论来思考和说话,摒弃新的正统意识形态经常依赖的对表象、分类、刻板印象和简单化的懒惰依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language as a Source of Liberation, and Language as a Source of Control
We think and act through language. It determines how we exchange ideas, express emotions and see the world. And as such, language has always been a motor for enlightenment and progress, but also a means of control. It expresses our identity, and that identity takes multiple forms, affecting and shaping our values and priorities, how we view the world and those around us. They also determine the language we use - and this, not surprisingly, often becomes a source of political, social, cultural and ideological struggle. It also explains why, over the course of history, the wielders of power have sought to restrict or alter the use of language - by controlling education, culture, social customs, awareness of history and perceptions of identity. Poles have their own experience of this from the time of the Partitions, when imperial rulers attempted to curb transmission of the Polish language. Yet the efforts are being witnessed today, notably in Russia's portrayal of events in Ukraine. Are there grounds for thinking struggles over language have become more extreme today, in the face of new ideological and social pressures, as powerful and well-resourced lobbies and interest-groups manipulate the confusion and self-doubt of the majority to advance their own agendas? If so, we should remind ourselves that the spread of permissive, self-willed Western mindsets is very far from universal. Indeed, such mindsets are widely contested; and while social media and mass culture have been used as vehicles for promoting radical change, they are also being used increasingly as channels for a more integral, conservative vision of the world and humanity. We need to think and speak with critical precision, with a healthy empirical scepticism - and reject the lazy reliance on epithets, categorisations, stereotypes and simplifications which the new ideological orthodoxies so often rely upon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信