利用树皮中的硬毛特征对 7 种柞树进行分类的卷积神经网络性能及其影响因素

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Jong Ho Kim, B. Purusatama, Alvin Muhammad Savero, Denni Prasetia, J. Jang, Se Young Park, Seung Hwan Lee, Nam Hun Kim
{"title":"利用树皮中的硬毛特征对 7 种柞树进行分类的卷积神经网络性能及其影响因素","authors":"Jong Ho Kim, B. Purusatama, Alvin Muhammad Savero, Denni Prasetia, J. Jang, Se Young Park, Seung Hwan Lee, Nam Hun Kim","doi":"10.15376/biores.19.1.510-524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the sclereids in the bark of oak species, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed to validate species classification performance and its influencing factors. Three optimizers including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), root mean square propagation (RMSProp), and dataset augmentation were adopted. The accuracy and loss stabilized at approximately 15 to 20 and 70 to 80 epochs for the augmented and non-augmented condition, respectively. In the last five epochs, the RMSProp-augmented condition achieved the highest accuracy of 89.8%, whereas the Adam-augmented condition achieved the lowest accuracy of 73.8%. Regarding the loss, SGD-non-augmented condition was the lowest at 0.498, whereas Adam-augmented condition was the highest at 2.740. The highest accuracy was influenced by RMSProp at 0.194. Dataset augmentation had a significant influence on accuracy at 0.456. Homogeneous subsets among the validation conditions indicated that the accuracy and loss were classified into the same subset using an augmented dataset during the training, regardless of the optimizer. Only Adam and RMSProp with non-augmented datasets were categorized into the same subset during the test. Hence, species classification using CNN and sclereid characteristics in the bark was feasible, and RMSProp with augmented datasets showed optimal performance for species classification.","PeriodicalId":9172,"journal":{"name":"Bioresources","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convolutional neural network performance and the factors affecting performance for classification of seven Quercus species using sclereid characteristics in the bark\",\"authors\":\"Jong Ho Kim, B. Purusatama, Alvin Muhammad Savero, Denni Prasetia, J. Jang, Se Young Park, Seung Hwan Lee, Nam Hun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15376/biores.19.1.510-524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the sclereids in the bark of oak species, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed to validate species classification performance and its influencing factors. Three optimizers including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), root mean square propagation (RMSProp), and dataset augmentation were adopted. The accuracy and loss stabilized at approximately 15 to 20 and 70 to 80 epochs for the augmented and non-augmented condition, respectively. In the last five epochs, the RMSProp-augmented condition achieved the highest accuracy of 89.8%, whereas the Adam-augmented condition achieved the lowest accuracy of 73.8%. Regarding the loss, SGD-non-augmented condition was the lowest at 0.498, whereas Adam-augmented condition was the highest at 2.740. The highest accuracy was influenced by RMSProp at 0.194. Dataset augmentation had a significant influence on accuracy at 0.456. Homogeneous subsets among the validation conditions indicated that the accuracy and loss were classified into the same subset using an augmented dataset during the training, regardless of the optimizer. Only Adam and RMSProp with non-augmented datasets were categorized into the same subset during the test. Hence, species classification using CNN and sclereid characteristics in the bark was feasible, and RMSProp with augmented datasets showed optimal performance for species classification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresources\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.1.510-524\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresources","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.1.510-524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于栎类树皮中的硬壳蛋白,采用卷积神经网络(CNN)验证了物种分类性能及其影响因素。采用了三种优化器,包括随机梯度下降(SGD)、自适应矩估计(Adam)、均方根传播(RMSProp)和数据集增强。在扩增和非扩增条件下,准确率和损失分别在大约 15 至 20 个和 70 至 80 个历时后趋于稳定。在最后五个 epochs 中,RMSProp 增强条件的准确率最高,达到 89.8%,而 Adam 增强条件的准确率最低,为 73.8%。在损失方面,SGD-non-augmented 条件的损失最低,为 0.498,而 Adam-augmented 条件的损失最高,为 2.740。受 RMSProp 影响的准确率最高,为 0.194。数据集增强对准确率的影响很大,为 0.456。验证条件中的同质子集表明,无论使用哪种优化器,准确率和损失都被归类到了训练期间使用的增强数据集的同一个子集中。只有使用非增强数据集的 Adam 和 RMSProp 在测试中被归入同一子集。因此,利用树皮中的 CNN 和 sclereid 特征进行物种分类是可行的,使用增强数据集的 RMSProp 在物种分类方面表现出最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convolutional neural network performance and the factors affecting performance for classification of seven Quercus species using sclereid characteristics in the bark
Based on the sclereids in the bark of oak species, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed to validate species classification performance and its influencing factors. Three optimizers including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), root mean square propagation (RMSProp), and dataset augmentation were adopted. The accuracy and loss stabilized at approximately 15 to 20 and 70 to 80 epochs for the augmented and non-augmented condition, respectively. In the last five epochs, the RMSProp-augmented condition achieved the highest accuracy of 89.8%, whereas the Adam-augmented condition achieved the lowest accuracy of 73.8%. Regarding the loss, SGD-non-augmented condition was the lowest at 0.498, whereas Adam-augmented condition was the highest at 2.740. The highest accuracy was influenced by RMSProp at 0.194. Dataset augmentation had a significant influence on accuracy at 0.456. Homogeneous subsets among the validation conditions indicated that the accuracy and loss were classified into the same subset using an augmented dataset during the training, regardless of the optimizer. Only Adam and RMSProp with non-augmented datasets were categorized into the same subset during the test. Hence, species classification using CNN and sclereid characteristics in the bark was feasible, and RMSProp with augmented datasets showed optimal performance for species classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioresources
Bioresources 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
397
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of BioResources is to promote scientific discourse and to foster scientific developments related to sustainable manufacture involving lignocellulosic or woody biomass resources, including wood and agricultural residues. BioResources will focus on advances in science and technology. Emphasis will be placed on bioproducts, bioenergy, papermaking technology, wood products, new manufacturing materials, composite structures, and chemicals derived from lignocellulosic biomass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信