开发固体白蚁诱饵基质并在实验室和半实地条件下进行药效试验

Muhammad Wajeeh Iqbal, Toheed Iqbal, Muhammad Irfan, Qaisar Hamad, Umaima Khaliq, Abdul Mujeeb, Azaz Ahmad, Ejaz Un Nabi
{"title":"开发固体白蚁诱饵基质并在实验室和半实地条件下进行药效试验","authors":"Muhammad Wajeeh Iqbal, Toheed Iqbal, Muhammad Irfan, Qaisar Hamad, Umaima Khaliq, Abdul Mujeeb, Azaz Ahmad, Ejaz Un Nabi","doi":"10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.3.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study on development of solid termite bait matrix and its efficacy against the Heterotermes indicola was performed in Peshawar, during 2023. The study was performed with completely randomized design (CRD) with different treatments i.e., developed bait, patent bait, popular wood and blotting paper. Each treatment was replicated three times. The laboratory experiment consisted of no-choice, free choice and aggregation test. While the semi-field experiment consisted of free choice test. During the no-choice test of the laboratory experiment, H. indicola showed a consumption rate of 6.29% for the popular wood and developed bait. However, in the blotting paper treatment, the termites consumed only 2.81%. In terms of choice test conducted in the lab, the popular wood exhibited the highest weight consumption percentage of 2.87%, while the patent bait displayed the lowest weight consumption percentage of 2.25%. Under the choice test maximum number of termites were attracted towards popular wood (77.00 Number of termites) while minimum number of termites were attracted towards patent bait (54.66 Number of termites). Whereas, in aggregation test, of the lab experiment, maximum number of termites were also aggregated towards popular wood (37.77 Number of termites) while minimum termites were aggregated for patent bait (25.22 Number of termites). In the case of free choice under semi-field conditions, the highest number of termites were observed on popular wood i.e., 380.00 followed by the developed bait, which recorded 293.50 termites. On the other hand, the lowest number of termites were recorded on the patent bait i.e., 231.50. Similarly, when considering the maximum consumed weight in percentage, popular wood exhibited the highest value at 16.24%, closely followed by the developed bait at 15.67% while the patent bait displayed minimum consumed weight percentage of 12.89%. In overall experiments it is concluded that among all the tested treatments, termites mostly consumed popular wood and developed bait. Since the developed bait showed promising results in attracting termites, it is recommended to continue refining its formulation. Conduct additional research to identify the key components or additives that enhance its attractiveness and consumption by termites. This optimization process can help maximize the effectiveness of the bait as a termite control strategy. Adding more popular wood saw dust in the bait may achieve more significant and desired results and can also prove to be cost efficient rather than adding more cellulosic material.","PeriodicalId":116159,"journal":{"name":"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing A Solid Termite Bait Matrix and Conducting Efficacy Trials Under Lab and Semi Field Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Wajeeh Iqbal, Toheed Iqbal, Muhammad Irfan, Qaisar Hamad, Umaima Khaliq, Abdul Mujeeb, Azaz Ahmad, Ejaz Un Nabi\",\"doi\":\"10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.3.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study on development of solid termite bait matrix and its efficacy against the Heterotermes indicola was performed in Peshawar, during 2023. The study was performed with completely randomized design (CRD) with different treatments i.e., developed bait, patent bait, popular wood and blotting paper. Each treatment was replicated three times. The laboratory experiment consisted of no-choice, free choice and aggregation test. While the semi-field experiment consisted of free choice test. During the no-choice test of the laboratory experiment, H. indicola showed a consumption rate of 6.29% for the popular wood and developed bait. However, in the blotting paper treatment, the termites consumed only 2.81%. In terms of choice test conducted in the lab, the popular wood exhibited the highest weight consumption percentage of 2.87%, while the patent bait displayed the lowest weight consumption percentage of 2.25%. Under the choice test maximum number of termites were attracted towards popular wood (77.00 Number of termites) while minimum number of termites were attracted towards patent bait (54.66 Number of termites). Whereas, in aggregation test, of the lab experiment, maximum number of termites were also aggregated towards popular wood (37.77 Number of termites) while minimum termites were aggregated for patent bait (25.22 Number of termites). In the case of free choice under semi-field conditions, the highest number of termites were observed on popular wood i.e., 380.00 followed by the developed bait, which recorded 293.50 termites. On the other hand, the lowest number of termites were recorded on the patent bait i.e., 231.50. Similarly, when considering the maximum consumed weight in percentage, popular wood exhibited the highest value at 16.24%, closely followed by the developed bait at 15.67% while the patent bait displayed minimum consumed weight percentage of 12.89%. In overall experiments it is concluded that among all the tested treatments, termites mostly consumed popular wood and developed bait. Since the developed bait showed promising results in attracting termites, it is recommended to continue refining its formulation. Conduct additional research to identify the key components or additives that enhance its attractiveness and consumption by termites. This optimization process can help maximize the effectiveness of the bait as a termite control strategy. Adding more popular wood saw dust in the bait may achieve more significant and desired results and can also prove to be cost efficient rather than adding more cellulosic material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.3.0071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandic Journal Of Advanced Research And Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55966/sjarr.2023.4.3.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年在白沙瓦进行了一项关于固体白蚁诱饵基质的开发及其对 Heterotermes indicola 有效性的研究。该研究采用完全随机设计(CRD)法,对不同的处理,即已开发的诱饵、专利诱饵、流行木材和吸墨纸进行处理。每种处理重复三次。实验室实验包括无选择、自由选择和聚集试验。半田间试验包括自由选择试验。在实验室实验的无选择试验中,H. indicola 对流行木材和研制的饵料的消耗率为 6.29%。然而,在吸墨纸处理中,白蚁的消耗率仅为 2.81%。在实验室进行的选择试验中,流行木材的消耗重量百分比最高,为 2.87%,而专利饵料的消耗重量百分比最低,为 2.25%。在选择试验中,流行木材吸引的白蚁数量最多(77.00 只),而专利诱饵吸引的白蚁数量最少(54.66 只)。而在实验室实验的聚集试验中,最多的白蚁也聚集在流行木材上(37.77 只),而最少的白蚁聚集在专利饵料上(25.22 只)。在半田间条件下的自由选择中,白蚁数量最多的是流行木材,即 380.00 只,其次是专利饵料,为 293.50 只。另一方面,专利诱饵的白蚁数量最少,为 231.50 只。同样,当考虑最大消耗重量百分比时,流行木材的数值最高,为 16.24%,紧随其后的是研制的诱饵,为 15.67%,而专利诱饵的消耗重量百分比最低,为 12.89%。总之,实验得出的结论是,在所有测试处理中,白蚁主要消耗流行木材和研制的诱饵。由于开发的诱饵在吸引白蚁方面显示出良好的效果,建议继续改进其配方。开展更多的研究,以确定能提高其吸引力和白蚁食用量的关键成分或添加剂。这一优化过程有助于最大限度地提高诱饵作为白蚁控制策略的效果。在诱饵中添加更多常用的木材锯末,可能会取得更显著和更理想的效果,而且比添加更多纤维素材料更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing A Solid Termite Bait Matrix and Conducting Efficacy Trials Under Lab and Semi Field Conditions
The study on development of solid termite bait matrix and its efficacy against the Heterotermes indicola was performed in Peshawar, during 2023. The study was performed with completely randomized design (CRD) with different treatments i.e., developed bait, patent bait, popular wood and blotting paper. Each treatment was replicated three times. The laboratory experiment consisted of no-choice, free choice and aggregation test. While the semi-field experiment consisted of free choice test. During the no-choice test of the laboratory experiment, H. indicola showed a consumption rate of 6.29% for the popular wood and developed bait. However, in the blotting paper treatment, the termites consumed only 2.81%. In terms of choice test conducted in the lab, the popular wood exhibited the highest weight consumption percentage of 2.87%, while the patent bait displayed the lowest weight consumption percentage of 2.25%. Under the choice test maximum number of termites were attracted towards popular wood (77.00 Number of termites) while minimum number of termites were attracted towards patent bait (54.66 Number of termites). Whereas, in aggregation test, of the lab experiment, maximum number of termites were also aggregated towards popular wood (37.77 Number of termites) while minimum termites were aggregated for patent bait (25.22 Number of termites). In the case of free choice under semi-field conditions, the highest number of termites were observed on popular wood i.e., 380.00 followed by the developed bait, which recorded 293.50 termites. On the other hand, the lowest number of termites were recorded on the patent bait i.e., 231.50. Similarly, when considering the maximum consumed weight in percentage, popular wood exhibited the highest value at 16.24%, closely followed by the developed bait at 15.67% while the patent bait displayed minimum consumed weight percentage of 12.89%. In overall experiments it is concluded that among all the tested treatments, termites mostly consumed popular wood and developed bait. Since the developed bait showed promising results in attracting termites, it is recommended to continue refining its formulation. Conduct additional research to identify the key components or additives that enhance its attractiveness and consumption by termites. This optimization process can help maximize the effectiveness of the bait as a termite control strategy. Adding more popular wood saw dust in the bait may achieve more significant and desired results and can also prove to be cost efficient rather than adding more cellulosic material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信