岩石空间变异中各向异性的尺寸效应:通过数字钻探进行评估

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jing Wang, Mingming He, Zhuoya Yuan, Xudong Ma, Xinxing Liu, Haoteng Wang, Bo Luo
{"title":"岩石空间变异中各向异性的尺寸效应:通过数字钻探进行评估","authors":"Jing Wang, Mingming He, Zhuoya Yuan, Xudong Ma, Xinxing Liu, Haoteng Wang, Bo Luo","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2023-070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating the anisotropy of rock and its size effect in spatial variation is of great significance for improving engineering efficiency and stability. For this purpose, an anisotropy index is used to quantify the magnitude of anisotropy in rock. Digital drilling tests are carried out in three directions on six types of rock to investigate the anisotropy of drilling parameters. The rock is subdivided into multiple diminutive units along the depth of drilling, and the effect of size on rock anisotropy based on drilling work was studied. The research findings indicate that the drilling work of six rock types exhibits anisotropy. Among these, the anisotropy sequence for the total drilling work of each rock is as follows: red sandstone > granite > slate > gneiss > sandstone > argillaceous sandstone. As the length of individual rock units increases, the anisotropy index of drilling work initially exhibits a fluctuating trend, subsequently reaching a state of stability, thereby manifesting a size effect. Furthermore, the Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for each type of rock exhibits distinct variations. The anisotropy indices for drilling work along the depth of the borehole exhibit an initial phase of rapid increase, followed by a convergence towards a value close to 1.0. The anisotropy of rocks demonstrates size dependence, and size effects also exhibit anisotropy. Anisotropy and its size effects are interconnected and inseparable. The reliability of the cited anisotropy index is checked by comparison with the other two anisotropy indices. The comparison results show that the method can reliably determine rock anisotropy. In summary, the research outlined in this paper presents a highly efficient and straightforward approach to evaluate the effect of size on rock anisotropy.","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":"333 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size Effect of Anisotropy in Rocks Spatial Variability: Evaluating through Digital Drilling\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wang, Mingming He, Zhuoya Yuan, Xudong Ma, Xinxing Liu, Haoteng Wang, Bo Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2023-070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluating the anisotropy of rock and its size effect in spatial variation is of great significance for improving engineering efficiency and stability. For this purpose, an anisotropy index is used to quantify the magnitude of anisotropy in rock. Digital drilling tests are carried out in three directions on six types of rock to investigate the anisotropy of drilling parameters. The rock is subdivided into multiple diminutive units along the depth of drilling, and the effect of size on rock anisotropy based on drilling work was studied. The research findings indicate that the drilling work of six rock types exhibits anisotropy. Among these, the anisotropy sequence for the total drilling work of each rock is as follows: red sandstone > granite > slate > gneiss > sandstone > argillaceous sandstone. As the length of individual rock units increases, the anisotropy index of drilling work initially exhibits a fluctuating trend, subsequently reaching a state of stability, thereby manifesting a size effect. Furthermore, the Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for each type of rock exhibits distinct variations. The anisotropy indices for drilling work along the depth of the borehole exhibit an initial phase of rapid increase, followed by a convergence towards a value close to 1.0. The anisotropy of rocks demonstrates size dependence, and size effects also exhibit anisotropy. Anisotropy and its size effects are interconnected and inseparable. The reliability of the cited anisotropy index is checked by comparison with the other two anisotropy indices. The comparison results show that the method can reliably determine rock anisotropy. In summary, the research outlined in this paper presents a highly efficient and straightforward approach to evaluate the effect of size on rock anisotropy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":\"333 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2023-070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2023-070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估岩石的各向异性及其在空间变化中的尺寸效应对提高工程效率和稳定性具有重要意义。为此,采用各向异性指数来量化岩石的各向异性程度。为了研究钻探参数的各向异性,对六种岩石进行了三个方向的数字钻探试验。岩石沿钻孔深度被细分为多个微小单元,研究了基于钻孔工作的尺寸对岩石各向异性的影响。研究结果表明,六种岩石类型的钻进工作呈现各向异性。其中,每种岩石的总钻孔工作量的各向异性顺序为:红砂岩 > 花岗岩 > 板岩 > 片麻岩 > 砂岩 > 粗砂岩。随着单个岩石单元长度的增加,钻孔工作量的各向异性指数最初呈波动趋势,随后达到稳定状态,从而体现出规模效应。此外,各类岩石的代表基本体积(REV)也呈现出明显的变化。沿钻孔深度方向的钻探工程各向异性指数呈现出快速上升的初始阶段,随后向接近 1.0 的值靠拢。岩石的各向异性与尺寸有关,尺寸效应也表现出各向异性。各向异性及其尺寸效应是相互联系、不可分割的。通过与其他两个各向异性指数的比较,检验了所引用的各向异性指数的可靠性。比较结果表明,该方法可以可靠地确定岩石各向异性。总之,本文概述的研究提出了一种高效、直接的方法来评估尺寸对岩石各向异性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Size Effect of Anisotropy in Rocks Spatial Variability: Evaluating through Digital Drilling
Evaluating the anisotropy of rock and its size effect in spatial variation is of great significance for improving engineering efficiency and stability. For this purpose, an anisotropy index is used to quantify the magnitude of anisotropy in rock. Digital drilling tests are carried out in three directions on six types of rock to investigate the anisotropy of drilling parameters. The rock is subdivided into multiple diminutive units along the depth of drilling, and the effect of size on rock anisotropy based on drilling work was studied. The research findings indicate that the drilling work of six rock types exhibits anisotropy. Among these, the anisotropy sequence for the total drilling work of each rock is as follows: red sandstone > granite > slate > gneiss > sandstone > argillaceous sandstone. As the length of individual rock units increases, the anisotropy index of drilling work initially exhibits a fluctuating trend, subsequently reaching a state of stability, thereby manifesting a size effect. Furthermore, the Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for each type of rock exhibits distinct variations. The anisotropy indices for drilling work along the depth of the borehole exhibit an initial phase of rapid increase, followed by a convergence towards a value close to 1.0. The anisotropy of rocks demonstrates size dependence, and size effects also exhibit anisotropy. Anisotropy and its size effects are interconnected and inseparable. The reliability of the cited anisotropy index is checked by comparison with the other two anisotropy indices. The comparison results show that the method can reliably determine rock anisotropy. In summary, the research outlined in this paper presents a highly efficient and straightforward approach to evaluate the effect of size on rock anisotropy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信