使用结构方程建模时考虑统计等效模型:以物理学特性为例

Q3 Social Sciences
Yangqiuting Li, Chandralekha Singh
{"title":"使用结构方程建模时考虑统计等效模型:以物理学特性为例","authors":"Yangqiuting Li, Chandralekha Singh","doi":"10.30722/ijisme.31.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a statistical method widely used in educational research to investigate relationships between variables. Using a SEM model involves a crucial step of considering statistically equivalent models and contemplating why the proposed model should not be rejected in favor of equivalent ones. However, many studies using SEM did not explicitly discuss this step. In this study, we use physics identity model as an example to demonstrate how multiple statistically equivalent models have distinct instructional implications. Previous research has indicated that physics identity comprises three dimensions: perceived recognition, self-efficacy, and interest. However, the relationships between these dimensions have not been thoroughly understood. Here, we discuss how our proposed model with perceived recognition predicting self-efficacy and interest is supported by prior studies involving individual student interviews and how intervention studies can further determine a more accurate causal model. Our study highlights the importance of considering statistically equivalent models when using SEM as an analysis tool.","PeriodicalId":39044,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering Statistically Equivalent Models when using Structural Equation Modeling: an Example from Physics Identity\",\"authors\":\"Yangqiuting Li, Chandralekha Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.30722/ijisme.31.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a statistical method widely used in educational research to investigate relationships between variables. Using a SEM model involves a crucial step of considering statistically equivalent models and contemplating why the proposed model should not be rejected in favor of equivalent ones. However, many studies using SEM did not explicitly discuss this step. In this study, we use physics identity model as an example to demonstrate how multiple statistically equivalent models have distinct instructional implications. Previous research has indicated that physics identity comprises three dimensions: perceived recognition, self-efficacy, and interest. However, the relationships between these dimensions have not been thoroughly understood. Here, we discuss how our proposed model with perceived recognition predicting self-efficacy and interest is supported by prior studies involving individual student interviews and how intervention studies can further determine a more accurate causal model. Our study highlights the importance of considering statistically equivalent models when using SEM as an analysis tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.31.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.31.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结构方程模型(SEM)是一种广泛应用于教育研究的统计方法,用于研究变量之间的关系。使用 SEM 模型涉及到一个关键步骤,即考虑统计学上的等效模型,并思考为什么不应该摒弃所提出的模型而选择等效模型。然而,许多使用 SEM 的研究并没有明确讨论这一步骤。在本研究中,我们以物理认同模型为例,说明多个统计上等效的模型如何具有不同的教学意义。以往的研究表明,物理认同包括三个维度:感知认可、自我效能感和兴趣。然而,这些维度之间的关系尚未得到透彻的理解。在此,我们将讨论我们提出的感知认可度预测自我效能感和兴趣的模型如何得到先前涉及学生个体访谈的研究的支持,以及干预研究如何进一步确定更准确的因果模型。我们的研究强调了在使用 SEM 作为分析工具时考虑统计等效模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considering Statistically Equivalent Models when using Structural Equation Modeling: an Example from Physics Identity
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a statistical method widely used in educational research to investigate relationships between variables. Using a SEM model involves a crucial step of considering statistically equivalent models and contemplating why the proposed model should not be rejected in favor of equivalent ones. However, many studies using SEM did not explicitly discuss this step. In this study, we use physics identity model as an example to demonstrate how multiple statistically equivalent models have distinct instructional implications. Previous research has indicated that physics identity comprises three dimensions: perceived recognition, self-efficacy, and interest. However, the relationships between these dimensions have not been thoroughly understood. Here, we discuss how our proposed model with perceived recognition predicting self-efficacy and interest is supported by prior studies involving individual student interviews and how intervention studies can further determine a more accurate causal model. Our study highlights the importance of considering statistically equivalent models when using SEM as an analysis tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信