尼日利亚南部一所大学教学医院的宫颈环扎术实践

C. John, J. Alegbeleye
{"title":"尼日利亚南部一所大学教学医院的宫颈环扎术实践","authors":"C. John, J. Alegbeleye","doi":"10.36348/sijog.2023.v06i10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although the aetiology of preterm deliveries is largely unknown, it is said to be multifactorial and cervical insufficiency has been implicated. Hence, cervical cerclage is a necessary and common prophylactic obstetric procedure for preventing prematurity and associated recurrent second trimester miscarriages. Objectives: To evaluate the pattern, indications, and fetal outcome of cervical cerclage. Methodology: This was a retrospective study of 50 women who had cervical cerclage insertion at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Data was obtained from the ward registers, theatre records, and case notes of the women, and entered into a structured proforma. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 25, and results are presented as frequency tables and charts. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35 ± 2.07 years. The mean of number of previous miscarriages was 2.46 ± 2.07, 56.8% were multiparous and 50% had a previous manual vacuum aspiration. Majority 35 (70%) of the women had prophylactic cerclage, 10 (20%) had cerclage following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy, while 5(10%) had rescue cerclage. Most 29 (58%) of the prophylactic cervical cerclage insertion were done between 11-15 weeks, with MacDonald technique being the most common technique practiced. Of these, only 18 (36%) carried the pregnancy up to 36 weeks of gestation. Conclusion: Many of cervical cerclage procedures were performed for prophylaxis and resulted in improved fetal outcomes in women who had previously experienced mid-trimester losses or preterm delivery.","PeriodicalId":394508,"journal":{"name":"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"204 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice of Cervical Cerclage at a University Teaching Hospital in Southern Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"C. John, J. Alegbeleye\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sijog.2023.v06i10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although the aetiology of preterm deliveries is largely unknown, it is said to be multifactorial and cervical insufficiency has been implicated. Hence, cervical cerclage is a necessary and common prophylactic obstetric procedure for preventing prematurity and associated recurrent second trimester miscarriages. Objectives: To evaluate the pattern, indications, and fetal outcome of cervical cerclage. Methodology: This was a retrospective study of 50 women who had cervical cerclage insertion at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Data was obtained from the ward registers, theatre records, and case notes of the women, and entered into a structured proforma. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 25, and results are presented as frequency tables and charts. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35 ± 2.07 years. The mean of number of previous miscarriages was 2.46 ± 2.07, 56.8% were multiparous and 50% had a previous manual vacuum aspiration. Majority 35 (70%) of the women had prophylactic cerclage, 10 (20%) had cerclage following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy, while 5(10%) had rescue cerclage. Most 29 (58%) of the prophylactic cervical cerclage insertion were done between 11-15 weeks, with MacDonald technique being the most common technique practiced. Of these, only 18 (36%) carried the pregnancy up to 36 weeks of gestation. Conclusion: Many of cervical cerclage procedures were performed for prophylaxis and resulted in improved fetal outcomes in women who had previously experienced mid-trimester losses or preterm delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2023.v06i10.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2023.v06i10.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然早产的病因尚不清楚,但据说是多因素造成的,宫颈机能不全也与此有关。因此,宫颈环扎术是一种必要且常见的产科预防性手术,可预防早产及相关的第二孕期复发性流产。目的评估宫颈环扎术的模式、适应症和胎儿结局。方法:这是一项回顾性研究:这是一项回顾性研究,对象是 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间在哈科特港大学教学医院接受宫颈环扎术的 50 名妇女。研究人员从病房登记簿、手术室记录和病例记录中获取数据,并将其输入结构化表格。数据分析采用 SPSS 25 版本,结果以频率表和图表的形式呈现。结果患者的平均年龄为(35 ± 2.07)岁。既往流产次数的平均值为(2.46 ± 2.07)次,56.8%为多胎,50%既往有过人工真空吸引术。35名妇女(70%)进行了预防性子宫环扎术,10名妇女(20%)在体外受精和胚胎移植妊娠后进行了子宫环扎术,5名妇女(10%)进行了抢救性子宫环扎术。大多数 29 例(58%)预防性宫颈环扎术是在怀孕 11-15 周时进行的,最常用的技术是麦克唐纳技术。其中,只有 18 例(36%)孕妇妊娠达 36 周。结论许多宫颈环扎术是为预防而进行的,对曾经历过中期妊娠流产或早产的妇女来说,其胎儿结局有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice of Cervical Cerclage at a University Teaching Hospital in Southern Nigeria
Background: Although the aetiology of preterm deliveries is largely unknown, it is said to be multifactorial and cervical insufficiency has been implicated. Hence, cervical cerclage is a necessary and common prophylactic obstetric procedure for preventing prematurity and associated recurrent second trimester miscarriages. Objectives: To evaluate the pattern, indications, and fetal outcome of cervical cerclage. Methodology: This was a retrospective study of 50 women who had cervical cerclage insertion at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Data was obtained from the ward registers, theatre records, and case notes of the women, and entered into a structured proforma. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 25, and results are presented as frequency tables and charts. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35 ± 2.07 years. The mean of number of previous miscarriages was 2.46 ± 2.07, 56.8% were multiparous and 50% had a previous manual vacuum aspiration. Majority 35 (70%) of the women had prophylactic cerclage, 10 (20%) had cerclage following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy, while 5(10%) had rescue cerclage. Most 29 (58%) of the prophylactic cervical cerclage insertion were done between 11-15 weeks, with MacDonald technique being the most common technique practiced. Of these, only 18 (36%) carried the pregnancy up to 36 weeks of gestation. Conclusion: Many of cervical cerclage procedures were performed for prophylaxis and resulted in improved fetal outcomes in women who had previously experienced mid-trimester losses or preterm delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信