关于新西兰和韩国小学如何通过教师经验拥抱多元文化的定性比较研究

Hyejin Bak, Soon-Yong Pak
{"title":"关于新西兰和韩国小学如何通过教师经验拥抱多元文化的定性比较研究","authors":"Hyejin Bak, Soon-Yong Pak","doi":"10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Zealand (NZ) and South Korea (Korea) have undergone different historical trajectories in the courses of nation building, which are reflected in their education goals. NZ has focused on incorporating Māori and Pasifika elements within largely European based curriculum to allow for a harmonious national identity that underscores diversity as a strength. Meanwhile, Korea has only in the last few decades put concrete efforts to shed the monoethnic cultural ideology in the schools. This qualitative study looks into how multiculturalism is perceived and acted upon by teachers in NZ and Korea respectively. The results suggest that there are marked differences on how the concept of multiculturalism is embodied in everyday teaching situations. In the NZ case, the concept was a natural extension of cultural processes, allowing the teacher to exercise autonomy in designing and carrying out relevant activities. Therefore, ‘multiculturalism’ was not an operational key term used as a daily vernacular. In contrast, teachers in Korea tended to rely on formulaic methods to incorporate multiculturalism in their pedagogical practices, which largely stems from top-down, state-led policies.","PeriodicalId":135100,"journal":{"name":"Korean Comparative Education Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Comparative Study on How Multiculturalism Is Embraced in Primary School Settings in New Zealand and Korea through Teachers’ Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Hyejin Bak, Soon-Yong Pak\",\"doi\":\"10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New Zealand (NZ) and South Korea (Korea) have undergone different historical trajectories in the courses of nation building, which are reflected in their education goals. NZ has focused on incorporating Māori and Pasifika elements within largely European based curriculum to allow for a harmonious national identity that underscores diversity as a strength. Meanwhile, Korea has only in the last few decades put concrete efforts to shed the monoethnic cultural ideology in the schools. This qualitative study looks into how multiculturalism is perceived and acted upon by teachers in NZ and Korea respectively. The results suggest that there are marked differences on how the concept of multiculturalism is embodied in everyday teaching situations. In the NZ case, the concept was a natural extension of cultural processes, allowing the teacher to exercise autonomy in designing and carrying out relevant activities. Therefore, ‘multiculturalism’ was not an operational key term used as a daily vernacular. In contrast, teachers in Korea tended to rely on formulaic methods to incorporate multiculturalism in their pedagogical practices, which largely stems from top-down, state-led policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Comparative Education Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Comparative Education Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Comparative Education Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新西兰(NZ)和韩国(Korea)在国家建设过程中经历了不同的历史轨迹,这反映在它们的教育目标中。新西兰注重将毛利族和太平洋岛民(Pasifika)元素纳入主要以欧洲为基础的课程中,以建立和谐的国家认同,强调多样性是一种力量。与此同时,韩国只是在过去几十年里才做出具体努力,以摆脱学校中的单一民族文化意识形态。这项定性研究探讨了新西兰和韩国的教师分别是如何看待多元文化并付诸行动的。研究结果表明,在日常教学情境中如何体现多元文化概念存在明显差异。在新西兰,这一概念是文化进程的自然延伸,允许教师自主设计和开展相关活动。因此,"多元文化主义 "并不是一个可操作的关键术语,而是一种日常用语。相比之下,韩国教师倾向于依靠公式化的方法将多元文化纳入教学实践,这在很大程度 上源于自上而下、国家主导的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Comparative Study on How Multiculturalism Is Embraced in Primary School Settings in New Zealand and Korea through Teachers’ Experiences
New Zealand (NZ) and South Korea (Korea) have undergone different historical trajectories in the courses of nation building, which are reflected in their education goals. NZ has focused on incorporating Māori and Pasifika elements within largely European based curriculum to allow for a harmonious national identity that underscores diversity as a strength. Meanwhile, Korea has only in the last few decades put concrete efforts to shed the monoethnic cultural ideology in the schools. This qualitative study looks into how multiculturalism is perceived and acted upon by teachers in NZ and Korea respectively. The results suggest that there are marked differences on how the concept of multiculturalism is embodied in everyday teaching situations. In the NZ case, the concept was a natural extension of cultural processes, allowing the teacher to exercise autonomy in designing and carrying out relevant activities. Therefore, ‘multiculturalism’ was not an operational key term used as a daily vernacular. In contrast, teachers in Korea tended to rely on formulaic methods to incorporate multiculturalism in their pedagogical practices, which largely stems from top-down, state-led policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信