阿甘本作为政治要素的 "停滞 "概念

Sunhyung Kang
{"title":"阿甘本作为政治要素的 \"停滞 \"概念","authors":"Sunhyung Kang","doi":"10.17924/solc.2023.70.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Agamben’s conception of ‘Stasis’(civil war) as a fundamental element of politics, placing it in the context of the state of exception. It explores how Agamben strives to connect with the inoperative community through the concept of civil war. In this analysis, it becomes evident that the concept of civil war can be understood as a crucial component of contemporary politics without endorsing real-life civil conflicts, terrorism, or violence. Civil war functions metaphorically as a tool for the sovereign to declare a state of exception, granting the power to perpetually maintain such a status. However, this declaration is always aimed at creating an operative community, reminiscent of the ideal envisioned by Nazism: a unified People overcoming internal divisions. Conversely, viewing civil war as a foundational element of politics leads us to consider an inoperative community─a community in constant division, lacking a fixed identity, akin to the refugee communities described by Arendt. This paper asserts that Agamben’s exploration of new communities encourages contemplation of civil war as a fundamental element, devoid of the endorsement of actualized violence.","PeriodicalId":409727,"journal":{"name":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","volume":"234 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agamben’s Concept of ‘Stasis’ as an Element of Politics\",\"authors\":\"Sunhyung Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.17924/solc.2023.70.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines Agamben’s conception of ‘Stasis’(civil war) as a fundamental element of politics, placing it in the context of the state of exception. It explores how Agamben strives to connect with the inoperative community through the concept of civil war. In this analysis, it becomes evident that the concept of civil war can be understood as a crucial component of contemporary politics without endorsing real-life civil conflicts, terrorism, or violence. Civil war functions metaphorically as a tool for the sovereign to declare a state of exception, granting the power to perpetually maintain such a status. However, this declaration is always aimed at creating an operative community, reminiscent of the ideal envisioned by Nazism: a unified People overcoming internal divisions. Conversely, viewing civil war as a foundational element of politics leads us to consider an inoperative community─a community in constant division, lacking a fixed identity, akin to the refugee communities described by Arendt. This paper asserts that Agamben’s exploration of new communities encourages contemplation of civil war as a fundamental element, devoid of the endorsement of actualized violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17924/solc.2023.70.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17924/solc.2023.70.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将阿甘本的 "停滞"(内战)概念置于例外状态的背景下,对其作为政治基本要素的概念进行了研究。本文探讨了阿甘本如何通过内战概念努力与不作为社会建立联系。通过分析可以发现,内战概念可以被理解为当代政治的一个重要组成部分,但并不赞同现实生活中的内战、恐怖主义或暴力。内战的功能隐喻为主权者宣布例外状态的工具,赋予永久维持这种状态的权力。然而,这一宣言的目的始终是建立一个可操作的共同体,让人想起纳粹主义所设想的理想:一个统一的民族克服内部分裂。反之,将内战视为政治的一个基本要素,则会让我们思考一个无法运作的共同体--一个不断分裂、缺乏固定身份的共同体,类似于阿伦特所描述的难民共同体。本文认为,阿甘本对新社群的探索鼓励我们将内战视为一个基本要素,而不是对现实暴力的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agamben’s Concept of ‘Stasis’ as an Element of Politics
This paper examines Agamben’s conception of ‘Stasis’(civil war) as a fundamental element of politics, placing it in the context of the state of exception. It explores how Agamben strives to connect with the inoperative community through the concept of civil war. In this analysis, it becomes evident that the concept of civil war can be understood as a crucial component of contemporary politics without endorsing real-life civil conflicts, terrorism, or violence. Civil war functions metaphorically as a tool for the sovereign to declare a state of exception, granting the power to perpetually maintain such a status. However, this declaration is always aimed at creating an operative community, reminiscent of the ideal envisioned by Nazism: a unified People overcoming internal divisions. Conversely, viewing civil war as a foundational element of politics leads us to consider an inoperative community─a community in constant division, lacking a fixed identity, akin to the refugee communities described by Arendt. This paper asserts that Agamben’s exploration of new communities encourages contemplation of civil war as a fundamental element, devoid of the endorsement of actualized violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信