帕金森病患者呼气肌肉力量训练前后的最大呼气压力及其与咳嗽气流的关系

Avery E. Dakin, J. Borders, James A. Curtis, K. Hegland, M. Troche
{"title":"帕金森病患者呼气肌肉力量训练前后的最大呼气压力及其与咳嗽气流的关系","authors":"Avery E. Dakin, J. Borders, James A. Curtis, K. Hegland, M. Troche","doi":"10.1044/2023_persp-23-00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) improves maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and several researchers have reported improvements to voluntary cough airflow in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the link between the change in MEP and cough and whether patient-specific factors impact the training response is not well understood. Therefore, study aims were to examine (a) the relationship between MEP and cough pre- and post-EMST, (b) the associations between the change in MEP and change in cough, and (c) if patient-specific factors predict the change MEP. This is a secondary analysis of data from 30 people with PD who completed MEP and voluntary and reflex cough testing via spirometry pre– and post–5 weeks of EMST. Pearson's r correlations were used for Aims 1 and 2. Multivariable linear regression was used for Aim 3. Pre-EMST correlations between MEP and cough as well as correlations between the change in MEP and change in cough were nonsignificant. Post-EMST, MEP was correlated with voluntary cough expired volume (CEV, r = .58 , p < .001), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, r = .56 , p = .001), and cough volume acceleration ( r = .47 , p = .009 ) , as well as reflex CEV ( r = .5, p = .005). Patient-specific factors did not predict the change in MEP. This study showed that there was a larger correlation between expiratory muscle strength and cough airflow post-EMST than pre-EMST for voluntary and reflex cough in PD; however, the correlation between the change was small. Future research is needed to identify additional physiologic changes that are impacting cough airflow after EMST. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24602565","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximal Expiratory Pressure and Its Link With Cough Airflow Before and After Expiratory Muscle Strength Training in Parkinson's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Avery E. Dakin, J. Borders, James A. Curtis, K. Hegland, M. Troche\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2023_persp-23-00065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) improves maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and several researchers have reported improvements to voluntary cough airflow in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the link between the change in MEP and cough and whether patient-specific factors impact the training response is not well understood. Therefore, study aims were to examine (a) the relationship between MEP and cough pre- and post-EMST, (b) the associations between the change in MEP and change in cough, and (c) if patient-specific factors predict the change MEP. This is a secondary analysis of data from 30 people with PD who completed MEP and voluntary and reflex cough testing via spirometry pre– and post–5 weeks of EMST. Pearson's r correlations were used for Aims 1 and 2. Multivariable linear regression was used for Aim 3. Pre-EMST correlations between MEP and cough as well as correlations between the change in MEP and change in cough were nonsignificant. Post-EMST, MEP was correlated with voluntary cough expired volume (CEV, r = .58 , p < .001), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, r = .56 , p = .001), and cough volume acceleration ( r = .47 , p = .009 ) , as well as reflex CEV ( r = .5, p = .005). Patient-specific factors did not predict the change in MEP. This study showed that there was a larger correlation between expiratory muscle strength and cough airflow post-EMST than pre-EMST for voluntary and reflex cough in PD; however, the correlation between the change was small. Future research is needed to identify additional physiologic changes that are impacting cough airflow after EMST. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24602565\",\"PeriodicalId\":74424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_persp-23-00065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_persp-23-00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼气肌力训练(EMST)可改善最大呼气压力(MEP),一些研究人员报告称帕金森病(PD)患者的自主咳嗽气流有所改善。然而,人们对 MEP 的变化与咳嗽之间的联系以及患者的特异性因素是否会影响训练反应还不甚了解。因此,本研究旨在探讨:(a)MEP 与 EST 前后咳嗽之间的关系;(b)MEP 变化与咳嗽变化之间的关联;以及(c)患者特异性因素是否可预测 MEP 的变化。 本研究对30名帕金森病患者的数据进行了二次分析,这些患者在接受EMST治疗前后5周内通过肺活量测定完成了MEP和自愿及反射性咳嗽测试。目标 1 和 2 采用了皮尔逊 r 相关性。目标 3 采用多变量线性回归。 EMST 前,MEP 与咳嗽之间的相关性以及 MEP 变化与咳嗽变化之间的相关性均不显著。EMST后,MEP与自主咳嗽呼气量(CEV,r = .58 ,p < .001)、呼气峰流速(PEFR,r = .56 ,p = .001)和咳嗽量加速度(r = .47 ,p = .009)以及反射性CEV(r = .5,p = .005)相关。患者特异性因素并不能预测 MEP 的变化。 本研究表明,对于肺结核患者的自主咳嗽和反射性咳嗽,EMST 后呼气肌力和咳嗽气流之间的相关性大于 EMST 前;但是,两者之间的相关性很小。未来的研究需要确定 EMST 后影响咳嗽气流的其他生理变化。https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24602565。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximal Expiratory Pressure and Its Link With Cough Airflow Before and After Expiratory Muscle Strength Training in Parkinson's Disease
Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) improves maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and several researchers have reported improvements to voluntary cough airflow in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the link between the change in MEP and cough and whether patient-specific factors impact the training response is not well understood. Therefore, study aims were to examine (a) the relationship between MEP and cough pre- and post-EMST, (b) the associations between the change in MEP and change in cough, and (c) if patient-specific factors predict the change MEP. This is a secondary analysis of data from 30 people with PD who completed MEP and voluntary and reflex cough testing via spirometry pre– and post–5 weeks of EMST. Pearson's r correlations were used for Aims 1 and 2. Multivariable linear regression was used for Aim 3. Pre-EMST correlations between MEP and cough as well as correlations between the change in MEP and change in cough were nonsignificant. Post-EMST, MEP was correlated with voluntary cough expired volume (CEV, r = .58 , p < .001), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, r = .56 , p = .001), and cough volume acceleration ( r = .47 , p = .009 ) , as well as reflex CEV ( r = .5, p = .005). Patient-specific factors did not predict the change in MEP. This study showed that there was a larger correlation between expiratory muscle strength and cough airflow post-EMST than pre-EMST for voluntary and reflex cough in PD; however, the correlation between the change was small. Future research is needed to identify additional physiologic changes that are impacting cough airflow after EMST. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24602565
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信