COVID-19 爆发前后韩国企业的工作重新分配模式

Jung-Hwan Hyun
{"title":"COVID-19 爆发前后韩国企业的工作重新分配模式","authors":"Jung-Hwan Hyun","doi":"10.46396/kjem..101.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper aims to explore how job reallocation changes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. More specifically, the paper calculates 5 job flows (job creation, destruction, reallocation, net employment growth and excess reallocation) and how they increase or decrease after the Covid-19 outbreak and examine whether the within-group reallocation is reinforced after the pandemic. Furthermore, the research estimates the key factors (variables) that bring a change in 5 job flows and what affects the most important job flow, namely excess job reallocation. Research design, data, and methodology: The research collects data necessary for empirical analysis from KISVALUE, the firm-level data source provided by NICE, a credit rating agency in Korea. And the paper adopts a standard methodology to generate 5 job flows, which was developed by Davis and Haltiwanger(1992). Also, i t also employs to Differences-in-Differences method to address what brings a change in 5 job flows after the outbreak of the pandemic. Results: The paper finds out evidence that there were a slight increase in job reallocation shortly after the pandemic unfolded and however job reallocation was alleviated in 2021 and 2022., which is inconsistent with previous studyies on financial crises (including 1997 financial crisis in Korea). Job reallocation between heterogeneous groups were intensified in the post-pandemic period. Furthermore, key performance indexes such as wage-to-sales ratio, leverage, average borrowing rate, ratio of financial expenditures to sales (or total costs) and net profit explain a increase or an decrease in 5 job flows. Notably, excess reallocation depends on leverage and financial expenditures, meaning that a change in the two variables have heterogeneous effects across industrial sectors. Implications: All in all, the main results indicate 3 important implications on job reallocation in the post Covid-19 period. First, Covid-19 is an economic shock that has a temporary effect on the magnitude of job reallocation. Second, although mild, it is a reallocative shock that brings reallocation of jobs across sectors or other groups of firms with different properties. Third, financial reasons such as leverage and financial expenditures are sources that results in job reallocation between 2-digit industrial sectors.","PeriodicalId":300861,"journal":{"name":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job Reallocation Patterns of Korean Firms before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak\",\"authors\":\"Jung-Hwan Hyun\",\"doi\":\"10.46396/kjem..101.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This paper aims to explore how job reallocation changes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. More specifically, the paper calculates 5 job flows (job creation, destruction, reallocation, net employment growth and excess reallocation) and how they increase or decrease after the Covid-19 outbreak and examine whether the within-group reallocation is reinforced after the pandemic. Furthermore, the research estimates the key factors (variables) that bring a change in 5 job flows and what affects the most important job flow, namely excess job reallocation. Research design, data, and methodology: The research collects data necessary for empirical analysis from KISVALUE, the firm-level data source provided by NICE, a credit rating agency in Korea. And the paper adopts a standard methodology to generate 5 job flows, which was developed by Davis and Haltiwanger(1992). Also, i t also employs to Differences-in-Differences method to address what brings a change in 5 job flows after the outbreak of the pandemic. Results: The paper finds out evidence that there were a slight increase in job reallocation shortly after the pandemic unfolded and however job reallocation was alleviated in 2021 and 2022., which is inconsistent with previous studyies on financial crises (including 1997 financial crisis in Korea). Job reallocation between heterogeneous groups were intensified in the post-pandemic period. Furthermore, key performance indexes such as wage-to-sales ratio, leverage, average borrowing rate, ratio of financial expenditures to sales (or total costs) and net profit explain a increase or an decrease in 5 job flows. Notably, excess reallocation depends on leverage and financial expenditures, meaning that a change in the two variables have heterogeneous effects across industrial sectors. Implications: All in all, the main results indicate 3 important implications on job reallocation in the post Covid-19 period. First, Covid-19 is an economic shock that has a temporary effect on the magnitude of job reallocation. Second, although mild, it is a reallocative shock that brings reallocation of jobs across sectors or other groups of firms with different properties. Third, financial reasons such as leverage and financial expenditures are sources that results in job reallocation between 2-digit industrial sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46396/kjem..101.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46396/kjem..101.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在探讨 Covid-19 大流行病发生后,就业再分配是如何变化的。更具体地说,本文计算了 Covid-19 爆发后的 5 个就业流(就业岗位创造、破坏、重新分配、净就业增长和超额重新分配)及其增减情况,并研究了大流行后组内重新分配是否得到加强。此外,研究还估算了带来 5 个就业流变化的关键因素(变量),以及对最重要的就业流(即超额就业再分配)产生影响的因素。 研究设计、数据和方法:研究从韩国信用评级机构 NICE 提供的企业级数据源 KISVALUE 中收集实证分析所需的数据。本文采用 Davis 和 Haltiwanger(1992 年)提出的标准方法生成 5 个职位流。此外,本文还采用了差分法(Differences-in-Differences method)来研究大流行病爆发后 5 个就业岗位流的变化情况。 结果:本文发现的证据表明,在大流行病爆发后不久,工作岗位重新分配略有增加,但在 2021 年和 2022 年工作岗位重新分配有所缓解,这与以往有关金融危机的研究(包括 1997 年韩国金融危机)不一致。疫情过后,异质群体之间的工作重新分配加剧。此外,工资与销售额比率、杠杆率、平均借贷率、财务支出与销售额(或总成本)比率和净利润等关键绩效指标也解释了 5 个就业岗位流动的增减。值得注意的是,超额重新分配取决于杠杆率和财务支出,这意味着这两个变量的变化会对不同产业部门产生不同的影响。 影响:总之,主要结果表明了 Covid-19 后时期就业再配置的三个重要影响。首先,"Covid-19 "是一种经济冲击,会对就业再配置的规模产生暂时性影响。其次,Covid-19 虽然是一种温和的经济冲击,但它也是一种重新分配冲击,会带来不同行业或不同性质的其他企业群体之间的工作岗位重新分配。第三,杠杆作用和财务支出等财务原因是导致两位数工业部门之间工作岗位重新分配的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Job Reallocation Patterns of Korean Firms before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak
Purpose: This paper aims to explore how job reallocation changes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. More specifically, the paper calculates 5 job flows (job creation, destruction, reallocation, net employment growth and excess reallocation) and how they increase or decrease after the Covid-19 outbreak and examine whether the within-group reallocation is reinforced after the pandemic. Furthermore, the research estimates the key factors (variables) that bring a change in 5 job flows and what affects the most important job flow, namely excess job reallocation. Research design, data, and methodology: The research collects data necessary for empirical analysis from KISVALUE, the firm-level data source provided by NICE, a credit rating agency in Korea. And the paper adopts a standard methodology to generate 5 job flows, which was developed by Davis and Haltiwanger(1992). Also, i t also employs to Differences-in-Differences method to address what brings a change in 5 job flows after the outbreak of the pandemic. Results: The paper finds out evidence that there were a slight increase in job reallocation shortly after the pandemic unfolded and however job reallocation was alleviated in 2021 and 2022., which is inconsistent with previous studyies on financial crises (including 1997 financial crisis in Korea). Job reallocation between heterogeneous groups were intensified in the post-pandemic period. Furthermore, key performance indexes such as wage-to-sales ratio, leverage, average borrowing rate, ratio of financial expenditures to sales (or total costs) and net profit explain a increase or an decrease in 5 job flows. Notably, excess reallocation depends on leverage and financial expenditures, meaning that a change in the two variables have heterogeneous effects across industrial sectors. Implications: All in all, the main results indicate 3 important implications on job reallocation in the post Covid-19 period. First, Covid-19 is an economic shock that has a temporary effect on the magnitude of job reallocation. Second, although mild, it is a reallocative shock that brings reallocation of jobs across sectors or other groups of firms with different properties. Third, financial reasons such as leverage and financial expenditures are sources that results in job reallocation between 2-digit industrial sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信