2011-2021年尼加拉瓜上空基于卫星的降雨量数据集的验证

Jassy D. Rivera Solís, Edwin. A. Ojeda Olivares, Francisco E. Chamorro Blandón
{"title":"2011-2021年尼加拉瓜上空基于卫星的降雨量数据集的验证","authors":"Jassy D. Rivera Solís, Edwin. A. Ojeda Olivares, Francisco E. Chamorro Blandón","doi":"10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rainfall is a key input for many weather and climate numerical models. Therefore the strong need to have a dense enough monitoring network for this parameter. Satellite-based rainfall products have emerged in recent decades as an alternative to the more expensive gauge stations. However, a proper validation of such satellite-based products against gauge data must be performed before using their data. This study presents a validation of CHIRPS dataset against gauge data for 17 stations across Nicaragua. The performance of the product was validated at different temporal scales (daily, pentadal, monthly and annual) by different error metrics. A total of six quantitative error metrics was assessed: Bias Percentage (PBIAS), Mean Error (ME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson’s r and Nash Stucliffe Efficiency (NSE). A total three categorical indices were assessed at daily time scale: Probability of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR) and Critical Success Index (CSI). The results showed that CHIRPS dataset have better performance at monthly and annual time scales, while it is not capable of adequately represent the daily variability.","PeriodicalId":335817,"journal":{"name":"Nexo Revista Científica","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of chirps gauge – satellite based rainfall dataset over Nicaragua, 2011 - 2021\",\"authors\":\"Jassy D. Rivera Solís, Edwin. A. Ojeda Olivares, Francisco E. Chamorro Blandón\",\"doi\":\"10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rainfall is a key input for many weather and climate numerical models. Therefore the strong need to have a dense enough monitoring network for this parameter. Satellite-based rainfall products have emerged in recent decades as an alternative to the more expensive gauge stations. However, a proper validation of such satellite-based products against gauge data must be performed before using their data. This study presents a validation of CHIRPS dataset against gauge data for 17 stations across Nicaragua. The performance of the product was validated at different temporal scales (daily, pentadal, monthly and annual) by different error metrics. A total of six quantitative error metrics was assessed: Bias Percentage (PBIAS), Mean Error (ME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson’s r and Nash Stucliffe Efficiency (NSE). A total three categorical indices were assessed at daily time scale: Probability of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR) and Critical Success Index (CSI). The results showed that CHIRPS dataset have better performance at monthly and annual time scales, while it is not capable of adequately represent the daily variability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nexo Revista Científica\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nexo Revista Científica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nexo Revista Científica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降雨量是许多天气和气候数值模型的关键输入参数。因此,非常有必要为这一参数建立足够密集的监测网络。近几十年来,出现了基于卫星的降雨量产品,可替代昂贵的雨量站。然而,在使用这些卫星产品的数据之前,必须对其与测站数据进行适当的验证。本研究介绍了 CHIRPS 数据集与尼加拉瓜 17 个站点的测站数据的验证情况。在不同的时间尺度(日、五分、月和年)上,通过不同的误差指标对产品的性能进行了验证。共评估了六个定量误差指标:偏差百分比 (PBIAS)、平均误差 (ME)、平均绝对误差 (MAE)、均方根误差 (RMSE)、Pearson's r 和 Nash Stucliffe Efficiency (NSE)。在每日时间尺度上共评估了三个分类指数:检测概率 (POD)、误报率 (FAR) 和临界成功指数 (CSI)。结果表明,CHIRPS 数据集在月度和年度时间尺度上具有较好的性能,而在日变化上则不能充分体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of chirps gauge – satellite based rainfall dataset over Nicaragua, 2011 - 2021
Rainfall is a key input for many weather and climate numerical models. Therefore the strong need to have a dense enough monitoring network for this parameter. Satellite-based rainfall products have emerged in recent decades as an alternative to the more expensive gauge stations. However, a proper validation of such satellite-based products against gauge data must be performed before using their data. This study presents a validation of CHIRPS dataset against gauge data for 17 stations across Nicaragua. The performance of the product was validated at different temporal scales (daily, pentadal, monthly and annual) by different error metrics. A total of six quantitative error metrics was assessed: Bias Percentage (PBIAS), Mean Error (ME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson’s r and Nash Stucliffe Efficiency (NSE). A total three categorical indices were assessed at daily time scale: Probability of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR) and Critical Success Index (CSI). The results showed that CHIRPS dataset have better performance at monthly and annual time scales, while it is not capable of adequately represent the daily variability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信